Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Why Curb Offshore Finance Now?

by Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky and Thomas Pogge on 4th May 2016

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky

Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky

The Panama Papers provide a glimpse into the netherworld of offshore finance. Many wealthy companies and individuals enrich themselves through secret dirty deals with dictators, terrorists, traffickers and other criminals or dodge taxes on their profits or investment income. Such unjust behaviour has serious economic and political consequences in the affluent West. In the developing world, the effects are catastrophic.

States can sustainably safeguard the rights and needs of their people only if they have competent and well-resourced governments that can be held accountable by the citizens. Poor countries often lack the necessary resources. This is partly due to their low standard of living: India has only about 3% of the U.S. average income, Cambodia 2%, Ethiopia 1%. It is also due to their low tax revenues of approximately 8-15% of national income compared to over 40% in the OECD countries.

Thomas Pogge

Thomas Pogge

While approximately 2% of North American private assets are hidden abroad, this percentage in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America is around 30%. In relative terms, developing countries suffer much greater capital and tax revenue losses from their rich citizens illicitly moving wealth to financial havens. And they also suffer much greater such losses from multinationals shifting profits among their subsidiaries and thereby accumulating huge fortunes in their tax haven subsidiaries, which buy cheaply from one sister subsidiary and sell expensively to another. The goods go directly from A to C, but profits accrue in B – with the result that the multinational pays no taxes in any of the three countries.

For a state to serve as a tax haven, it must have tax loopholes and must practice strict confidentiality. Many idyllic small states meet these conditions, but mainstream Western states do it too: the US, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Ireland, the UK, the Netherlands, Germany and Singapore. They do it to attract capital, and under pressure from large multinationals. And they at least get to tax the shareholders’ investment income which is boosted by the tax shenanigans of multinationals. The real losers are the poorer states.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

A Washington think tank, Global Financial Integrity, has spent many years analyzing and quantifying illicit financial flows. GFI estimates that these cost developing countries over $1 trillion annually – about eight times as much as they receive in official development assistance. The consequences are fatal. Christian Aid estimates that, if this money were properly taxed, governments of developing countries would have $160 billion more in annual tax revenue. Keeping current expenditure patterns fixed, this would lead to substantial gains in human rights fulfillment for their populations, with increased health spending averting some 350,000 deaths each year of children under 5. In addition, far more capital would be available to fuel economic development.

The international system of tax havens, front companies, false trusts, anonymous accounts and corrupt banks, lawyers and lobbyists – harboring some $21-31 trillion in illicit wealth – is a massive impediment to the eradication of world poverty, to which all states have repeatedly committed themselves, most recently last September when they adopted the Sustainable Development Goals in the UN General Assembly. To reach these Goals, it would be helpful to double aid – but far more helpful still to halve illicit outflows from developing countries and to collect due taxes on the retained wealth and profits.

Another reason to prioritize such reforms is that they would greatly reduce crime: the misappropriation of funds by politicians, civil servants and business executives, the illicit trafficking of people, drugs and weapons, and international terrorism.

A third reason, finally, is the strong inequality-aggravating impact of the underground financial system. The richest 1% of humanity already owns more than half of private wealth – while the poorer half owns 0.6% or as much as the 62 richest billionaires. Inequality is bound to continue rising rapidly as the rich can increase their wealth unhandicapped by law, morality, publicity or taxes. It is not surprising that while offshore assets are rising, they also become ever more concentrated among a declining number of owners. This means that the tax revenues dodged worldwide now accrue almost entirely to the very wealthiest. The resulting huge economic and social inequalities threaten not only development in the poorer states but also democracy and social mobility in the developed West.

The Panama Leaks have opened a genuine opportunity for reform. We must recall that states agreed in 2015 that one of the Sustainable Development Goals is to reduce illicit financial flows by 2030. Yet, if we entrust implementation to the elites, this opportunity will be lost. We must understand the most promising reform proposals – many of which are discussed in the recent OUP book Global Tax Fairness – and must mobilize in their support. While the issues are tedious and complex, we have good intellectual leadership by people in universities, think tanks, NGOs and international agencies who have for years discussed the problem and possible reforms, including recently in the UN Human Rights Council.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Why Curb Offshore Finance Now?

Filed Under: Economy

About Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky and Thomas Pogge

Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky is the UN Independent Expert on Foreign Debt and Human Rights. Thomas Pogge is Director of Yale’s Global Justice Program and co-editor of Global Tax Fairness, Oxford UP 2016.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards