Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour






  • About
  • Books
  • Papers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
  • Podcasts
    • Social Europe Podcast
    • Start Worrying, Details to Follow Podcast
  • Spotlight Videos
    • Branko Milanovic On Globalisation, Migration, Rising Inequality And Populism
    • How Could Donald Trump And Brexit Happen?
  • Social Europe Talk
  • Advertise on Social Europe

The European Parliament Elections – Habermas Versus Farage

by Rene Cuperus on 14 November 2013 @ReneCuperus

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
European Parliament

Rene Cuperus

The 2014 election campaign for the European Parliament sees Euro-realists squeezed between federal radicals and anti-EU-extremists. Our leading politicians are reluctant to come to the rescue.

You would expect that, in the run off to the ‘mother of all European elections’ – the forthcoming May 2014 elections for the European Parliament, at which everyone expects a giant battle between pro-EU and anti-EU forces -, that political parties would come up with the best lists of candidates possible and campaign on the most daring and convincing party programmes ever.

For the Netherlands, and my own party, Dutch Labour (PvdA), I am afraid to say, this is not the case. It is even worse than could be imagined: a tragic paradox seems to be playing out over the last decade. The more important and powerful the EU-level and eurozone matters become, the less quality parties seem to be able and willing to invest in European politics, in terms of personnel and programme development.

Social democratic parties preach that, by definition, they are the internationalist pro-EU parties, but they do not practice this with their heart and soul, to put it mildly.

Historically, it has not been the best or the brightest who have been active in European politics in Brussels and Strasbourg (I dare to say so, because I was a European candidate myself on the last PvdA-list, representing the not so good and bright). The strange thing is that this does not seem to be improving spectacularly, now European politics is more and more centre-stage due to the financial-economic governance of the currency union and the (assumed) disappearance of borders in our post-national world.

I dare to break this taboo on personal political quality, because the leadership candidates for the PvdA-group in the European Parliament did so themselves, even in Dutch newspapers:

Sorry that it is us who stand for these elections, being not very well-known and experienced politicians at all. In fact, we need a guy of the standing and stature of Frans Timmermans, the actual Dutch Minister for Foreign Affairs, to lead our campaign, but these kind of people are not available.

Unfortunately, this is totally true. Nobody likes to run for the European Parliament in the Netherlands. The EP is a very unpopular institution, with a bad reputation in terms of greed, corruption, inefficiency and symbolic politics. In political debates in the Netherlands, the negative stories about Brussels and Strasbourg are played out loudly by the eurosceptic parties. The EU in general can be defended with good arguments, but, say, the Strasbourg seat of the EP is totally indefensible in times of austerity and a populist zeitgeist.

In the narrative about the Europe Union and European integration, the European Parliament constitutes ‘the weakest link’. It is, true or not, the most vulnerable, controversial and disputed institution of the EU. The communicative tragedy (for mainstream pro-EU parties) is that many debates about Europe’s future have to be channelled through the elections of the European Parliament. So fundamental discussions about the eurozone make-up, or subsidiarity, are mixed up, and polluted by negative stereotype discussions about the European Parliament.

Problematic on top of that is that European elections are second order elections of the most horrific nature. Voters are not turning out (democratically shameful scores of below 40% are no exception). They feel negatively indifferent about European politics. Europe “for the many, not the few’’ is a slogan far from the reality of the feathered-bed elitist politics that has come to hold sway in the past decade.

This all seems to be radically different at the forthcoming elections in May 2014. We are facing a make-or-break moment for Europe. The European Union is storming toward a huge clash. A clash between two opposing camps of radicals: the ‘federal radicals’ versus the ‘populist radicals’. This may result in an electoral bloodbath.

Two extreme camps stand against each other. On the one hand, there is the camp of anti-EU forces. For the European elections of May 2014 an unprecedented and powerful new alliance has been formed by right-wing populist and (former?) far right parties. This alliance consists of parties such as the French Front National, the Italian Lega Nord, the Dutch Geert Wilders Freedom’s party (PVV), the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) and the Flemish Vlaams Belang party of Filip Dewinter.

Jointly they are preparing an anti-EU campaign for the elections and will explore forming a new radical-right grouping within the European Parliament. Geert Wilders has said that ‘our parties could make the Europhile elite sing a different tune’. They are calling for a break-up of both the eurozone and the European Union. Marine Le Pen, the leader of Front National, has vowed that the European Union would ‘collapse like the Soviet Union’. She criticised the EU as a ‘global anomaly’ and pledged to return the bloc to a ‘cooperation of sovereign states’. She said Europe’s population had ‘no control’ over their economy or currency, nor over the movement of people in their territory. ‘I believe that the EU is like the Soviet Union now: it is not improvable,’ she said. ‘The EU will collapse like the Soviet Union collapsed.’

Not that far away from the political goals of the new anti-EU alliance (but seriously keeping distance, especially from the islamophobe and xenophobe image of the new right-wing populist alliance) is the UKIP party of Nigel Farage in the United Kingdom. A more complex player has also entered the field in the form of Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland party, which criticises the make-up and governance of the eurozone, but is not anti-EU per se.

The other camp of federal radicals contains Brussels old boy’s insider-networks such as the Spinelli Group of federalist MEPs (led by Guy Verhofstadt and Andrew Duff), or a new established group of eleven German economists, political scientists and jurists, the Glienicker Group, which recently developed proposals for a deeper union. These groups, frontrunners and avant-garde of the European establishment, plea for a rapid and drastic deepening of European integration – a federal leap -, to finally solve the contemporary euro crisis. They plea for a new Convention and a new Treaty to form a Federal Political Union, in which the European Commission is transformed into a EU constitutional government, or by which a euro-government is formed, a central government for the eurozone.

What about the third camp, the camp of moderate euro-realists? This camp, and this makes matters more complex and vulnerable, contains the majority of the European electorate and the majority of the mainstream political parties in Europe. This camp is neither ‘anti-EU nationalistic’ nor ‘Europistic-federalist’.

The tragedy is that this third camp seems to be paralysed and squeezed in-between the more fanatic outspoken federal radicals and nationalistic extremists, and therefore suffers from weak candidates and weak programmes with hybrid positions.

As a result, strong, experienced, common-sense driven mainstream European politicians are not leading the campaign for a reformed Europe: rather it is our great thinkers who have been sent out to do the dirty job. Intellectuals are acting as anti-populist and anti-neoliberal spokesmen. Jürgen Habermas is all over the place, defending a reformed transnational democratic European Union for a post-national world order. And Anthony Giddens just published his apologia for Europe: ‘Turbulent and Mighty Continent. What Future for Europe?’

Habermas and Giddens versus Farage and Le Pen. Fingers crossed for Europe.

This column was first published by Policy Network.

Share
Tweet
Share
Email

About Rene Cuperus

René Cuperus is Director for International Relations and Senior Research Fellow at the Wiardi Beckman Foundation, think tank of the Dutch Labour Party/PvdA. He is also columnist at Dutch daily de Volkskrant.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Dani Rodrik What’s Been Stopping The Left? Dani Rodrik
George Tyler Codetermination Enters The American Political Debate George Tyler
Ngaire Woods How To Steal The Populists’ Clothes Ngaire Woods
Noemi Lendvai-Bainton The Social Disinvestment State Unleashed Noemi Lendvai-Bainton
Steve Coulter Europe Needs A Pay Rise And Europeans Want Good Jobs Steve Coulter

Most Popular Posts

Guy Standing Left Should Stop Equating Labour With Work Guy Standing
Henning Meyer round Understanding The SPD’s Grand Coalition Dilemma Henning Meyer
Paul De Grauwe Catalonia And Brexit: The Same Nationalism Paul De Grauwe
Germany: What Happens Next? Claus Offe
Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson What Can We Learn From The Nordic Model? Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson

Other Social Europe Publications

Social Democracy – A SWOT Analysis
Inequality In Europe
Can Neoliberalism Be Saved From Itself?
OP 13: How To Deal With Poland And Hungary
A Chronicle of Crisis: 2011 – 2016
Social Europe Edition Book

Zygmunt Bauman was a towering intellectual who saw and analysed – right up to his death in early 2017 – the great socio-political changes, often convulsive, in modern western society long before his peers. Here we highlight his prescient insights into what he dubbed ‘liquid modernity’ with 24 chapters on topics ranging from online loneliness via precarity/poverty/inequality to migration, fear of the ‘Other’ and the decline of the nation state. Chronicle of Crisis, 2011-16, written by one of the great chroniclers of our times, will be read and re-read for decades and more to come.


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Ad

The European Union needs a democratic restart to make people enthusiastic about the European idea again. A key factor in this is greater mandatory employee participation. The European Dialogue 2018 is sounding out what the requirements for strengthening the “Worker´s Voice” are and what the European politicians should do.


MORE INFO

New Social Europe Book

There is increasing evidence of widespread disillusion with the major shift to neoliberal economic policies that has taken place across much of the world. In this account of neoliberalism’s failings, Colin Crouch recognises some of its positive contributions but also notes conflicts within the neoliberal camp – particularly those between ‘market’ and ‘corporate’ forms of the strategy. Finally, he considers to what extent those behind the great experiment are now capable of accepting its reform.


MORE INFO

ILO Advertisement
Explore employment estimates from the International Labour Organization. Create charts and download data with the WESO Data Finder.
ETUI Advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe

This year's Benchmarking Working Europe focuses on whether the European Union is really on the path towards convergence. Analysing the state of 'working Europe' with the aid of a multi-level and multi-dimensional set of indicators, Benchmarking Working Europe 2018 demonstrates that, despite renewed economic growth in GDP terms, the proceeds of this growth are being unequally shared and structural problems in the areas of education, infrastructure and R&D remain due to the EU's obsession with labour market deregulation and fiscal austerity.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound Advertisement

European Quality of Life Survey 2016

The overview report of Eurofound’s fourth European Quality of Life Survey is now available. Nearly 37,000 people in 33 European countries were interviewed as part of the Survey. The overview report, which presents findings for EU Member States, shows general progress in the three keys areas of review: quality of life, quality of society and quality of public services – though not in all countries and not for all social groups. The executive summary is available in 22 languages.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Social Europe

  • Editorial Team & Advisory Board
  • Article Submission
  • Copyright, Disclaimer & Contact

RSS Feeds

All Content
Columns & Interviews
Blogs
Talks & Events

Search Social Europe

© Social Europe 2018