Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

EUSSR: A Reasonable Analogy?

Vytenis Andriukaitis 8th October 2018

vytenis andriukaitisDear Brian,

Thank you for your sincere letter that I read with great interest. I respectfully disagree with many things you wrote and hence feel compelled to reply openly. It will also help me to address issues that have been raised here and there by other people. I hope you do not mind.

I will reply point by point and I dare to hope, since we are of similar age and thus “old enough to read and comprehend history with objectivity”, that you will consider my replies the way I considered yours. By that matter, I must warn you that I also happen to have a degree in history.

Screen Shot 2018 10 05 at 13.28.17

Let us start with 1973 when ‘your misfortune’ started with the UK joining the EEC, just a few years after Charles de Gaulle’s resignation.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Back in the USSR

Back in 1973 there was no such thing as freedom of speech, religion, property, or press in the USSR. There was no multiparty system either, there was only one view and one ideology allowed. From a USSR point of view, the UK joining the EEC meant that the ‘imperialistic’ forces in the world gained more power. I wonder what would have happened if instead of joining the EEC, the UK had chosen to join the USSR? To my historical knowledge, your leaders quite unanimously saw some differences between the two back then.

I accept your sincerity when you say that Britain would have been glad to ‘save’ the Baltic countries if only it had been in the position to do so. I do not want to sound petty and dig into the ‘dirty laundry’ but signing Yalta and Potsdam agreements did not really ‘help’. Au contraire… But that’s history.

 And, indeed,  rationing of food after WWII was a rather normal thing for more than a decade in the whole of Europe, the islands and the continent. For instance, rationing in Siberia was equivalent to 140 g of bread per person per day.

You mention some specific secret documents. I will be honest I am not a big fan of conspiracy theories.  Maybe it is because they remind me of Stalin’s regime. Conspiracy theories always have the same pattern and I have witnessed too many of those being spread as plague in the USSR…

Because of such theories millions of people were imprisoned in gulags. So no, I am not a fan of any ‘secret documents’ and do not know of any ‘underhand’ plans of Jean Monet sending people to concentration and forced labour camps.

Opt-out UK

You mention ‘laws and regulations’ from Brussels. Could you point me to a single regulation where London did not have a say since the UK joined the EU? I am eager to learn. As far as I have witnessed all of these ‘laws’ are being negotiated by the UK government and in the past, when some were regarded by London as fundamentally against the British interests, the UK has been quite successful in getting derogations. More than that, many of these same laws and regulations were actually initiated by the UK. You might know that the single market was your former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s idea. I believe it was a true British success.

And respectfully, Mr. Gorbachev have said many things after his attempts to copy-paste some of the elements of the EU into the USSR utterly failed because copy-paste without accepting fundamental rights cannot work.

All in all, dear Brian, likening the EU to the USSR is wrong and offensive. Many people who lived under Soviet regime can tell you why. One example would be that a letter such as yours, addressed by any USSR inhabitant to the government. would have meant a sentence for its author – concentration camp, psychiatric clinic or, in worse case, a death row.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

So why and how to compare? Maybe the situation would have been different had the UK joined the USSR in 1973, had de Gaulle not resigned and continued to block the UK accession. Who knows. I don’t. What I know is that in Lithuania, we did not want to go ‘back to the USSR’, but instead chose to ‘go West’.

You also mention the Treaty. I assure you that I know a lotof the articles by heart and even some very specific terms used in the Treaty such as the ‘ever closer union’ that was initially proposed by the UK conservatives.

While fully respecting the referendum results I cannot see how saying that ‘Britain is leaving an Organization’ supports the Catalonian case. Spain is a country, not an Organization. Or have I missed something in your reasoning?

History should indeed tell us something. You say the UK has done without Europe before and can do again. Well, I believe that no country can do alone. We are all interdependent, we all need each other and ahead of challenges that we face, such as climate change, we will need each other even more. Friendship and partnership has been, is and will always be paramount. I am constantly reassured that many of your fellow citizens still count, us, Europeans, among their close friends and partners.

In partnership both the UK and the EU will prosper. For that to happen, we better make sure that no generation, either in the EU or in Britain, believes the toxic lies of the likes of Farage, Johnson, Le Pen and others.

I cared about people all my life, when I was a medical doctor, when I was a Member of Parliament, or now as Commissioner. Rest assured of that. And take care.

Can you still compare?

Yours truly,

Vytenis Andriukaitis

Citizen of Lithuania, citizen of the European Union (not subject of anything or anyone).

vandr

P.S. I wrote this reply to you after bumping into Reza Deghati exhibition in Buenos Aires and seeing the photo above. Prisoners in the gulags would tattoo faces of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin in order to avoid execution as no one was allowed to shoot at a portrait of a leader. I have seen with my own eyes these tattoos being done.

First published on the Commissioner’s blog site

Vytenis Andriukaitis

EU Commissioner for Health and Food Safety

You are here: Home / Politics / EUSSR: A Reasonable Analogy?

Most Popular Posts

Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic

Most Recent Posts

transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin
central and eastern Europe,unions,recognition Social dialogue in central and eastern EuropeMartin Myant
women soldiers,Ukraine Ukraine war: attitudes changing to women soldiersJennifer Mathers and Anna Kvit
military secrets,World Trade Organization,WTO,NATO,intellectual-property rights Military secrets and the World Trade OrganizationUgo Pagano
energy transition,Europe,wind and solar Europe’s energy transition starts to speed upDave Jones

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube