Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Social Europe on the wrong track?

by Livia Spera, Luca Visentini, Roman Hebenstreit and Wolfgang Katzian on 18th December 2020 @VisentiniLuca

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn

The Dobersberger case proved that some workers could be more equal than others.

Dobersberger,social dumping
Livia Spera

The European Union puts social progress, non-discrimination and equal rights at the core of its values. The aim of EU law must be to uphold these values and protect the workers it governs.

Yet picture this: one train, in which Hungarian and Austrian railway workers work side by side … but the Hungarians are paid significantly less than their Austrian colleagues. Workers’ fundamental rights are on the line when labour is seen as a cheap commodity.

Dobersberger,social dumping
Luca Visentini

Unfair and unfounded

It’s been one year since the Dobersberger ruling (C-16/18) of December 19th 2019, which saw the Court of Justice of the EU make an unfair and unfounded—indeed incomprehensible—prouncement: Hungarian workers providing catering and cleaning services on a train route from Salzburg and Munich to Budapest could receive Hungarian wages for their work done abroad. The case showed that when workers need it the most, Europe fails to protect them, the court allowing that freedom to provide a service should trump social rights.

Dobersberger,social dumping
Roman Hebenstreit

The CJEU’s ruling not only contradicted the EU’s core values but also went outside its mandate—surprisingly ordaining that on-board services did not count for a considerable part of the workday of these workers. The task of the court in preliminary rulings is to give guidance on the interpretation of EU law and not on facts. Any assessment of facts is for the referring national court alone.

The ruling shed light on, but unfortunately also legitimised, abusive subcontracting. It has opened the door to cross-border subcontracting as a means to undermine and circumvent applicable sectoral collective agreements, thus resulting in social dumping and the fragmentation of workers’ protection.

Cutting-edge thinking straight to your inbox

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit
Dobersberger,social dumping
Wolfgang Katzian

Circumventing regulations

In the Dobersberger case, an Austrian enterprise obtained a contract for services,  founded a subsidiary in Hungary and additionally reached out to a Hungarian enterprise to carry out the contract—in simple terms, this was subcontracting. The Austrian company took advantage of the neighbouring labour market, as Hungarian wages and working conditions are inferior, establishing a subcontracting chain allowing it to circumvent Austrian labour regulations. This brings us to the situation where workers doing the same job, in the same place, could receive different wages and have different working conditions.

EU rules adopted to ensure that all workers are treated the same, no matter their nationality, are easily undermined if the principle of equal treatment is overlooked by the interpretation and application of EU law.It is unacceptable that European courts, through damaging interpretations, should open doors to abusive practices that expose the citizens they are bound to protect to unfairness.

The Dobersberger ruling set a dangerous precedent too. Wage-dumping is already widespread across Europe: construction workers, truck drivers, cabin crew and seasonal workers have all been on the receiving end.

The railway sector, once dominated by a culture of compliance with social rights, is now on the edge of falling into the social-dumping pit. With 2021 designated European Year of Rail, we call on the EU institutions to strengthen its social reputation, rather than undermining it.


Please help us improve public policy debates


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house or big advertising partners. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you. You can support us by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month.

Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Action urgent

To avoid a proliferation of abusive practices, the EU needs to step up its efforts for a more social Europe. The Dobersberger ruling demonstrates the need for urgent action to bring abusive subcontracting under scrutiny.

To ensure fundamental workers’, social and trade union rights take precedence over economic freedoms, the European trade union movement is also calling for a ‘social progress protocol‘ to be added to the EU treaties. This issue must lie at the heart of the debates of the upcoming Conference on the Future of Europe.

Trade unions will keep fighting together to ensure equal conditions for workers working side by side—be that on rail, in other modes of transport or in any other sector. It is high time to end the abuse of internal-market rules, where workers are played off against one another.

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn
Home ・ Economy ・ Social Europe on the wrong track?

Filed Under: Economy

About Livia Spera, Luca Visentini, Roman Hebenstreit and Wolfgang Katzian

Livia Spera is general secretary of the European Transport Workers Federation (ETF). Luca Visentini is general secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC). Roman Hebenstreit is chair of the Austrian trade union vida and of the group works council of the Austrian Federal Railways ÖB. Wolfgang Katzian is president of the Austrian Trade Union Federation (ÖGB).

Partner Ads

Most Popular Posts

decarbonisation,energy transition Europe’s decarbonisation challenge? ‘Wir schaffen das’ Adam Tooze
integrated review Lost an empire, not found a role Paul Mason
Uber v Aslam,UK Supreme Court Putting the brakes on the spread of indecent work Ruth Dukes and Wolfgang Streeck
debt cancellation,cancellation of debt,ECB Cancelling a debt we already own has a false allure Anne-Laure Delatte, Michel Husson, Benjamin Lemoine, Éric Monnet, Raul Sampognaro, Bruno Tinel and Sébastien Villemot
horizontal inequalities,vertical inequalities Fissures that tear us apart and pressures that weigh us all down Kate Pickett

Other Social Europe Publications

RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?
US election 2020
Corporate taxation in a globalised era
The transformation of work
The coronavirus crisis and the welfare state

ETUI advertisement

Social protection during the pandemic: freelancers in the creative industries

This working paper identifies some key areas of policy intervention for advancing socially sustainable and fair solutions for freelancers working in the creative industries, who are among those who have suffered the most from the economic fallout of the Covid-19 pandemic. In particular, the authors focus on those who work entirely on their own account, without employees (ie the ‘solo self-employed’), and who undertake project- or task-based work on a fixed-term basis.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

#Care4Care!

It took us a global pandemic to realise that we depend on care. Despite all the clapping from the balconies, care workers continue to work in precarious and vulnerable conditions. Women, who represent 70% of the care workforce, continue to suffer from a severe lack of recognition for both their paid and unpaid care work. It’s time for a care revolution! It’s time to #Care4Care! The Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS), together with the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES), has been intensively working since 2019 to monitor the EU gender equality policy agenda through a progressive lens focusing particularly on its care dimensions.


FIND OUT MORE HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

Renewing labour relations in the German meat industry: an end to 'organised irresponsibility'?

Over the course of 2020, repeated outbreaks of Covid-19 in a number of large German meat-processing plants led to renewed public concern about the longstanding labour abuses in this industry. New legislation providing for enhanced inspection on health and safety, together with a ban on contract work and limitations on the use of temporary agency employees, holds out the prospect of a profound change in employment practices and labour relations in the meat industry. Changes in the law are not sufficient, on their own, to ensure decent working conditions, however. There is also a need to re-establish the previously high level of collective-bargaining coverage in the industry, underpinned by an industry-wide collective agreement extended by law to cover the entire sector.


FREE DOWNLOAD

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards