Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour






  • About
  • Books
  • Papers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
  • Podcasts
    • Social Europe Podcast
    • Start Worrying, Details to Follow Podcast
  • Spotlight Videos
    • Branko Milanovic On Globalisation, Migration, Rising Inequality And Populism
    • How Could Donald Trump And Brexit Happen?
  • Social Europe Talk
  • Advertise on Social Europe

The Challenge of New Chauvinism in Europe

by Stefan Collignon on 6 April 2010

1 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Email

The extreme right is on the move again. Forward, not in retreat. And European social democrats are hiding their heads in the sand, but the danger is not going away.

In France the Front National and in Italy the xenophobic Lega Nord got over 12 % at the recent regional elections. The upcoming elections in the Netherlands and Hungary are likely to confirm further inroads for right-wing populists and last year’s European election strengthened populist parties in many countries. However, their success is not only at the ballot box. Right-wing ideologies are poisoning European politics, and undermine peace and prosperity. Remember Nicolas Sarkozy declaring: ‘It is justifiable if a Renault factory is built in India so that Renault cars may be sold to the Indians, but it is not justifiable if a factory of a certain producer is built in the Czech Republic and its cars are sold in France’? After losing to LePen, his government, the government of the country that invented human rights, now wants to prohibit the freedom of religious practice for Muslim women. In the UK, wildcat strikes demanded last year: ‘British jobs for British workers’. The latest calamity is Germany. Since the national-liberal FDP joined her government, Angela Merkel has replaced European solidarity by an aggressive German taxpayer-first approach that is damaging all Europeans regardless of whether they live outside or inside Germany.

What all these examples have in common is a new form of chauvinism. Ravenscroft has described chauvinism as ‘a bias in favour of the familiar’. Dictionaries define it as ‘prejudiced belief in the superiority of one’s own gender, group, or kind’ or ‘a blind belief in national superiority’. Hannah Arendt observed: ‘Chauvinism is an almost natural product of the national concept insofar as it springs directly from the old idea of the ‘national mission.’ … (A) nation’s mission might be interpreted precisely as bringing its light to other, less fortunate peoples that, for whatever reason, have miraculously been left by history without a national mission.’ Who follows the debate in Germany about Greek deficits and monetary stability cannot help but thinking that there is a blind belief in a national mission, coupled with a bias in favour of the familiar.

Chauvinism is dangerous, because it prevents rational political decisions in favour of citizens’ long-term interests. The wisdom of the crowd, to which populists appeal, is a feeling of belonging to a community, which has always done things in the familiar way. When the world changes, however, and new solutions are needed, the bias in favour of the familiar becomes a trap that prevents moving to a better world.

There is no doubt that the world is changing radically. The global population is growing from today’s 6 billion to over 9 billion in the next generation and this development puts enormous pressures on natural resources and the sustainability of the planet. Climate change is only one aspect of this transformation. Growing conflicts over the distribution of resources and potentially massive migration of disadvantaged populations are another. Falling living standards and rising poverty are a third. No wonder that people are disturbed and seek comfort from the familiar.

Industrialisation in the 19th century generated a first wave of globalisation, but it needed the nation state to implement the necessary social and political changes. Socialists realised that they had to conquer the state in order to correct the misery caused by unfettered markets. Social democrats learned that only a democratic state could ensure that people got what they needed and wanted. Today, we go through a second wave of globalisation, but the nation state is too small to handle and regulate the global challenges we face, especially in Europe where no single country represents more than one percent of world population. The nation state can no longer protect its people. Forget the glory of the past. Europe is the future.

This is what new chauvinists do not understand. When Chancellor Merkel proposes that one should exclude a member state from the Euro Area that does not comply with the fiscal budget rules, largely defined and imposed by the German mission for stability and purity, she may say something that reassures her public opinion. Yet, she undermines the very foundation on which German prosperity is built. Without the single market and the stability of a large Euro Area, the German model of a social market economy would collapse. Sarkozy’s protectionism damages French citizens by lowering economic growth and the purchasing power of wages. Go-alone policies have not protected British workers against the crisis – to the contrary, they made things worse. Fact is: without solidarity there is no lasting peace, neither within nor between nations.

Europe’s social democrats must face up to the challenge. Some have thought they could win with chauvinist discourses of their own. Ségolène Royal wanted a French flag in every household, New Labour drew lines in the sand against Europe, and Gerhard Schröder defined German interests in opposition to neighbours, as if Germans were not Europeans as well. These leaders have failed. LePen is still there, the UK Independence Party became stronger than Labour, Germany is governed by nationalist-liberal neo-cons.

There is a different way. Sigmar Gabriel has made the point: the political centre in society is not given, but conquered by becoming the ‘sovereign of interpretation’ (Deutungshoheit). The first priority for European social democrats must be the struggle against the chauvinistic interpretation of the interests of European citizens.

1 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Email

About Stefan Collignon

Stefan Collignon is Professor of Political Economy at St. Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa and President of the Scientific Committee of Centro Europa Ricerche (CER), Rome. He was also Centennial Professor of European Political Economy at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and Visiting Professor at Harvard University. Apart from his column for Social Europe Journal, Stefan publishes regularly in newspapers such as The Financial Times and The Financial Times Germany.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Roberto AZ Borghi The World Is Changing: Ten Years After The Great Recession Roberto AZ Borghi
Charles Enoch New Tax Paradigm In The Digital Age Charles Enoch
SlAWOMIR SIERAKOWSKI Germany’s Populist Temptation Sławomir Sierakowski
Camilla Galli da Bino What About Men? Camilla Galli da Bino and Karel Fric
Juan Tokatlian Two Minutes To Midnight Juan Tokatlian

Most Popular Posts

Guy Standing Left Should Stop Equating Labour With Work Guy Standing
Henning Meyer round Understanding The SPD’s Grand Coalition Dilemma Henning Meyer
Paul De Grauwe Catalonia And Brexit: The Same Nationalism Paul De Grauwe
Germany: What Happens Next? Claus Offe
Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson What Can We Learn From The Nordic Model? Jón Baldvin Hannibalsson

Other Social Europe Publications

Social Democracy – A SWOT Analysis
Inequality In Europe
Can Neoliberalism Be Saved From Itself?
OP 13: How To Deal With Poland And Hungary
A Chronicle of Crisis: 2011 – 2016
ILO Advertisement
Explore employment estimates from the International Labour Organization. Create charts and download data with the WESO Data Finder.
ETUI Advertisement

Labour Market Reforms in Europe after 2010

This working paper examines the impact of fiscal austerity on EU labour market policies. Using a case study approach, it examines: the extent of change in unemployment benefit levels and policies; the effect of this on groups of workers; and whether the logic of activation policies has shifted. Overall, the broad direction of policy has not altered greatly under austerity. However, risks remain that an underlying move towards greater flexibility may lock in ‘low road’ growth strategies that will make it harder to bring down debt and unemployment in future.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound Advertisement

Statutory Minimum Wages 2018

Eurofound’s Statutory minimum wages 2018 report provides information on minimum wage rates that are not limited to specific sectors, occupations or groups of employees. It aims to answer a number of key questions on the coverage and impact of minimum wages in Europe; including how statutory minimum wages are determined, how minimum wages compare to average and median wages, and the different discussions ongoing in Europe on the issue. The report shows that increases to statutory minimum wages have gathered pace since 2010, but huge gaps remain in minimum wage rates across Europe.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Social Europe Edition Book

Zygmunt Bauman was a towering intellectual who saw and analysed – right up to his death in early 2017 – the great socio-political changes, often convulsive, in modern western society long before his peers. Here we highlight his prescient insights into what he dubbed ‘liquid modernity’ with 24 chapters on topics ranging from online loneliness via precarity/poverty/inequality to migration, fear of the ‘Other’ and the decline of the nation state. Chronicle of Crisis, 2011-16, written by one of the great chroniclers of our times, will be read and re-read for decades and more to come.


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Ad

The European Union needs a democratic restart to make people enthusiastic about the European idea again. A key factor in this is greater mandatory employee participation. The European Dialogue 2018 is sounding out what the requirements for strengthening the “Worker´s Voice” are and what the European politicians should do.


MORE INFO

New Social Europe Book

There is increasing evidence of widespread disillusion with the major shift to neoliberal economic policies that has taken place across much of the world. In this account of neoliberalism’s failings, Colin Crouch recognises some of its positive contributions but also notes conflicts within the neoliberal camp – particularly those between ‘market’ and ‘corporate’ forms of the strategy. Finally, he considers to what extent those behind the great experiment are now capable of accepting its reform.


MORE INFO

Social Europe

  • Article Submission
  • Editorial Team & Advisory Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright & Contact

RSS Feeds

All Content
Columns & Interviews
Blogs
Talks & Events

Search Social Europe

© Social Europe 2018