Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Global cities
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

The Unfulfilled Promise Of Social Rights In Crisis EU

Robbie Pye and Owen Parker 21st January 2016

Robbie Pye

Robbie Pye

The economic governance structures that have emerged in response to the Eurozone crisis have been widely and rightly critiqued for their anti-social and anti-democratic consequences. We argue in a recent SPERI paper that one pragmatic way in which we might attempt to reform such governance is by asserting the EU’s own rhetorical and constitutional commitment to fundamental rights. In particular, this would mean pushing for an assessment of social rights in the European semester process that adheres to the standards of the Council of Europe’s European Committee for Social Rights.

The structures of economic governance that have emerged since around 2010 in response to the economic and monetary crisis have rightly come in for significant criticism from academics, activists and the media in recent years.  Labels such as ‘executive federalism’, ‘neo-liberal authoritarianism’ and ‘authoritarian constitutionalism’ have been deployed to characterise contemporary socio-economic governance in the EU.  They capture the way in which executive power has been strengthened to impose a counter-productive neo-liberal austerity. The threat to what remains of the European social model – in the shape of national social and welfare settlements – and a European democracy – in the form of parliamentary politics and inclusive governance – is stark from the perspective of such critics.  We broadly agree with these now well-rehearsed critiques.

Owen Parker

Owen Parker

The central question motivating our recent paper is: how might we realistically begin to reverse this direction of travel and revive the fortunes of a social Europe?  We argue that responses to this question have mainly taken two forms: the first unrealistically ambitious and the second not ambitious enough to succeed. The first kind of response argues for a radical break with the prevailing neo-liberal constitutional settlement: either the uploading of a social democratic constitution to EU level or the undoing of monetary union and a return of democratic autonomy at national level. The problem with such radical proposals is that integration and disintegration blockages – a consequence of what Fritz Scharpf identified as the joint decision trap – are likely to militate against them in the short to medium term.

The second kind of response is more pragmatic: it looks to transform the institution of the European semester by making it more inclusive of social actors and more deliberative. Some have proposed, for instance, a greater role for social and employment ministers alongside their economics/finance counterparts. Some have proposed the further development of the so-called ‘open method of co-ordination’ – the soft governance mechanisms that have long been used in employment and social policy in the EU. The problem with such proposals is that they fail to address the fundamental constitutional asymmetry between the economic and the social. In short, social goals will continue to be subordinated to economic ones as long as the former are governed by soft co-ordination mechanisms and the latter by hard law (a law which has in fact hardened recently).

Offering a middle way between these extremes, our paper suggests that a constitutional basis for a rebalancing towards more social goals already exists in the EU, in the form of the EU’s stated commitment to fundamental rights, including social rights. The EU has a Charter of Fundamental Rights (EUCFR) that includes social rights and the European Commission has said that it wishes to be an ‘exemplary actor’ when it comes to rights. While the EU itself (including the case law of the European Court of Justice) has not established clear or substantive standards on social rights, another European institution has done so: namely, the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR), which operates under the auspices of the Council of Europe and provides oversight of the implementation of the European Social Charter (ESC) (established in 1961). The ESC is not alien to the EU: it is referred to in the EU treaties, it has been drawn upon by the ECJ, and it has inspired many of the social rights in the EUCFR.


Become part of our Community of Thought Leaders


Get fresh perspectives delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for our newsletter to receive thought-provoking opinion articles and expert analysis on the most pressing political, economic and social issues of our time. Join our community of engaged readers and be a part of the conversation.

Sign up here

In the context of its recent economic governance the EU has been far from ‘exemplary’ on rights and certainly not on social rights. Not only have these not been systematically considered in the context of this governance (as they arguably should have been), such governance has in fact eroded social rights in national contexts. In our paper we suggest that the EU can and should be held to its own commitments by incorporating the standards of the ECSR into all aspects of its governance and, in particular, its European semester.

The ECSR has developed standards on social rights in two ways: minimum standards and what it calls progressive realisation. Within the framework of our proposal EU socio-economic policy recommendations that breach minimum standards would not be permissible (various examples of such standards can be found in a recent report by the president of the ECSR on ‘anti-crisis’ legislation). Those standards would disallow, for instance, any recommendation to force the decentralisation of collective bargaining or to create a contract with an excessive period of no employment protection. Notably, these are both policies that were adopted in Spain following EU recommendations; both have been critiqued in recent ECSR reports.

In accordance with the principle of progressive realisation, the ECSR has set out more ambitious social rights standards towards which states should be working, contained in a large body of case law. We argue that any EU policy recommendations that run counter to these more substantive standards would need to be explicitly justified as proportionate and in pursuit of a legitimate aim. For illustrative purposes, two such standards are: a right to collective bargaining that ensures bargaining structures at the national, regional, and sectoral level and a right to compensation in the event of unfair employment practices that is sufficiently high to effectively combat such practices. The existence of such standards would, according to our proposal, at the very least compel a publicised debate concerning the proportionality of the EU’s apparent commitment to the decentralisation of collective bargaining and ever more flexible and deregulated labour markets.

While we frame our proposal as both achievable and effective (where others may be less so), we are clear that even this proposal would require for its realisation a significant political shift, and that such a proposal is not, on its own, likely to be enough. Nevertheless, given the rhetorical importance of rights to the EU and the potential for a rights discourse to trigger debate and change, we think there is much unfulfilled promise in strategies aimed at the promotion of social rights in crisis EU.

Robbie Pye and Owen Parker

Robbie Pye is a Doctoral Researcher in the Department of Politics at the University of Sheffield. Owen Parker is Senior Lecturer in European Politics at the University of Sheffield.

You are here: Home / Politics / The Unfulfilled Promise Of Social Rights In Crisis EU

Most Popular Posts

Ukraine,fatigue Ukraine’s cause: momentum is diminishingStefan Wolff and Tetyana Malyarenko
Russia,information war Russia is winning the information warAiste Merfeldaite
Nanterre,police Nanterre and the suburbs: the lid comes offJoseph Downing
Russia,nuclear Russia’s dangerous nuclear consensusAna Palacio
Belarus,Lithuania A tale of two countries: Belarus and LithuaniaThorvaldur Gylfason and Eduard Hochreiter

Most Recent Posts

G7,BRICS,China,Russia G7 versus the BRICS: taking stock in 12 figuresThorvaldur Gylfason
solar energy,photovoltaic,Europe,EU,PV Powering up: the EU and solar energyFrancesco Crespi, Dario Guarascio, Serenella Caravella and Giacomo Cucignatto
Nagorno-Karabakh Nagorno-Karabakh: it’s not over yetSvante Lundgren
Sweden,climate,green Sweden’s climate policy—off the railsLisa Pelling
Biden,Detroit,UAW,strike Detroit, Joe Biden and a union renaissancePaul Knott

Other Social Europe Publications

strategic autonomy Strategic autonomy
Bildschirmfoto 2023 05 08 um 21.36.25 scaled 1 RE No. 13: Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care
front cover Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI European Collective Bargaining Report 2022 / 2023

With real wages falling by 4 per cent in 2022, workers in the European Union suffered an unprecedented loss in purchasing power. The reason for this was the rapid increase in consumer prices, behind which nominal wage growth fell significantly. Meanwhile, inflation is no longer driven by energy import prices, but by domestic factors. The increased profit margins of companies are a major reason for persistent inflation. In this difficult environment, trade unions are faced with the challenge of securing real wages—and companies have the responsibility of making their contribution to returning to the path of political stability by reducing excess profits.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The future of remote work

The 12 chapters collected in this volume provide a multidisciplinary perspective on the impact and the future trajectories of remote work, from the nexus between the location from where work is performed and how it is performed to how remote locations may affect the way work is managed and organised, as well as the applicability of existing legislation. Additional questions concern remote work’s environmental and social impact and the rapidly changing nature of the relationship between work and life.


AVAILABLE HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound Talks: does Europe have the skills it needs for a changing economy?

In this episode of the Eurofound Talks podcast, Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound’s research manager, Tina Weber, its senior research manager, Gijs van Houten, and Giovanni Russo, senior expert at CEDEFOP (The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training), about Europe’s skills challenges and what can be done to help workers and businesses adapt to future skills demands.

Listen where you get your podcasts, or for free, by clicking on the link below


LISTEN HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The summer issue of the Progressive Post magazine by FEPS is out!

The Special Coverage of this new edition is dedicated to the importance of biodiversity, not only as a good in itself but also for the very existence of humankind. We need a paradigm change in the mostly utilitarian relation humans have with nature.

In this issue, we also look at the hazards of unregulated artificial intelligence, explore the shortcomings of the EU's approach to migration and asylum management, and analyse the social downside of the EU's current ethnically-focused Roma policy.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube