Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Shaping the future of democracy at work

by Isabelle Schömann on 25th November 2020 @IsaSchoemann

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Action is needed at European level to ensure workers enjoy democracy at work, particularly in the context of digitalisation.

co-determination, works council
Isabelle Schömann

Democracy, as a fundamental value of the European Union, provides the foundation for the trade union movement, with solidarity its raison d’être.

Democracy at work is one of the cornerstones of the social-market economy. Workers’ voices find expression in the exercise of collective rights, in private and publicly owned companies. Day after day, trade unions effectively exercise those rights and defend the interests of workers.

Exploiting loopholes

Democracy at work cannot however be taken for granted. It can only be considered consolidated as long as a majority of actors respect and support democratic principles and the exercise of democratic rights.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Democracy also relies on strong democratic institutions, to adopt and review legislation, so as to guarantee the effet utile of workers’ rights to information, consultation and participation. EU and national legislators should guarantee that European law does not lead to de facto circumvention of participation rights—as when businesses exploit loopholes in the European Company directive or create letterbox companies.

Lack of recognition of information, consultation and participation rights is a telling denial of democracy, not least in the public sector. On this, the European social partners in central government have negotiated an agreement, which should find its way into EU law.

New company forms

Likewise, new company forms—especially in the digital economy—should be regulated, so as to stop those business models circumventing fiscal and social rules, and in particular workers’ participation. This is leading to in-work poverty and precariousness, drastically affecting young people and women.

Digitalisation has a profound impact not only on how people work, their workloads and their health and safety at work. It also brings with it new means of management and control, and new forms of surveillance of workers’ behaviour and performance. This should be addressed, so that trade unions can defend workers’ rights to data protection and privacy.

All these attempts to minimise, sideline or evade workers’ rights clearly show that democracy at work is nowhere near as widespread as it should be. They weaken trade union structures and reduce the means available to workers and their representatives to defend and promote the interests of the workforce effectively. It is therefore of utmost importance to set standards within the EU.

Critical part

Democracy at work is not just nice to have—it is a must. It is fundamental to the trade union movement. Strong trade unions defend working people’s interests in Europe and the ability of workers to express their demands collectively is a critical part of the functioning of democracy at work.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

For many, it is at the workplace that they experience the support of their trade unions most directly, most visibly, thanks to works councils and trade union delegations and occupational health and safety committees. European works councils and representatives on boards are the few places where unions have influence at company level—all the more important to counteract businesses’ short-term economic and financial interests.

Why? Not only is democracy at work the prerequisite for a wide range of positive outcomes for workers, business and society. It also delivers, in good times as well as bad, and is the foundation of social and economic cohesion.

Co-determination

The evidence clearly shows that those companies where workers’ representation and participation rights were respected, and effectively exercised, weathered the financial and economic crisis of 2008-09 more successfully than companies without co-determination. Democracy at work also promotes better quality jobs and wellbeing at work, respect for health and safety, higher wages, better working conditions, more productive workers, higher labour-force participation and more innovative companies.

Democracy at work is in any event a fundamental right, fostering more equal societies and more active and confident citizens through greater worker involvement at the workplace. Workers’ participation is the most powerful democratic antidote to inequality.

And co-determination is not just a promising idea for the future to help strengthen the presence of workers in corporate governance. It is an instrument of collective control over the disruptive and damaging impacts of globalisation, which is already anchored in law in 18 of the 27 member states of the EU.

Action urgent

It is the political and social responsibility of the EU and member states firmly to address these issues. This is all the more important during an unprecedented pandemic, when working people and their families should be at the core of political action. The European Trade Union Confederation, together with the European Trade Union Federations, has repeatedly alerted the EU and national institutions to the need to act urgently.

The labour ministers’ statement at the last Council of the EU meeting in October is a first step in the right direction. It is however not enough—words should be transformed into actions.

Concretely, democracy at work should entail:

  • revision of the European Works Council directive, so that workers and their representatives can be informed and consulted effectively;
  • elaboration of a new EU framework for information, consultation and participation of workers, so that businesses do not use EU law to circumvent workers’ voices;  
  • anchoring board-level employee representation rights in EU company law, so that democracy at work becomes an essential element of sustainable corporate governance and a prerequisite for companies to do business and exercise freedom of establishment in the EU, and
  • rendering access to public funds and public procurement conditional on democracy at work.

Democracy at work needs much more than a mention of the EU acquis in the European Pillar of Social Rights—failing to identify any new, progressive course of action. The EU also needs substantive inclusion of workers’ voices in the implementation of the pillar.

Autonomy and power

Far from weakening the need for democracy at work, the pandemic has revealed that workers’ participation is extremely important in such critical situations, in mobilising forces and resources for working people and their families to maintain employment. In good times, meanwhile, workers’ participation substantially strengthens workers’ voices and autonomy over their work, and their power over work processes and their working environment.

It is a means to shape the company they work for, whether publicly or privately owned, and the economy as a whole. Fundamental rights cannot stop at the factory gate nor at the office door. They cannot be secondary rights either.

More democracy at work is crucial for social and economic cohesion. We should invest much more in making it happen, now, and in shaping a responsible and sustainable future for the people of Europe.

This is part of a series on the Transformation of Work supported by the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Economy ・ Shaping the future of democracy at work

Filed Under: Economy Tagged With: transformation of work

About Isabelle Schömann

Isabelle Schömann was elected confederal secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation at the 14th Congress in Vienna in May 2019. From 2005 to 2016, she was a senior researcher with the European Trade Union Institute in Brussels.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards