Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Creating A Union With A “Human Face”: A European Unemployment Insurance

Daniele Fattibene 13th July 2015

Daniele FattibeneThe latest economic crisis has shown that the claims of the early 2000s that the EU’s common monetary policy would act as a stabilising force for the overall economic cycle has proved unrealistic. Meanwhile, national welfare systems have been tremendously weakened. The recession has thus unveiled the “original sin” of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) – the lack of fiscal coordination and solidarity among its members. In this context, the ambitious proposal of creating a European system of automatic fiscal stabilisers has resurfaced. A European Unemployment Insurance (EUI) for the EMU would be a feasible and effective tool to cushion the impact of an economic downturn, stimulating aggregate demand by supporting disposable incomes and reducing the pressure to cut fiscal stabilisers in a pro-cyclical way (the so called “race-to-the-bottom” effect). Most of all, it would give a “human face” to the EMU, by tackling the existing imbalances through policies with a far-reaching impact on the everyday lives of citizens.

What Does The EUI Consist Of?

A basic EUI is a targeted and temporary fiscal stabiliser. It addresses all employees in the Eurozone, who have contributed to national insurance systems for at least 12 months prior to unemployment. Taking into account the differences in GDP per capita among the EMU Member States, the EUI would provide an average insured wage of around 80 percent of the average national wage, with a replacement payment of 50 percent of the insured wage for a limited timeframe (12 months). The scheme would be financed with taxes paid both by employers and employees and collected through national unemployment insurance administrations. A common unemployment insurance should be a flexible tool, able to run surpluses or deficits in individual years, depending on the overall economic performance of the Union. The EUI would complement rather than replace already existing national fiscal stabilisers. Hence, States would be free to use national funds to add further resources to the scheme. Simulations have revealed that a basic EUI would have cost around €50 billion per year over the period 2000-2013 (which means 0.5 percent of the total GDP in the Eurozone).

Weaknesses

There are several reasons behind the opposition to the implementation of a basic EUI. The risk that permanent transfers would emerge among Member States is an important source of concern. Some analysts warn that a basic EUI would make some States (Austria, Germany and the Netherlands) net contributors, and others (Spain, France and Latvia) net recipients. Another fiscal problem regards the way the scheme would be financed. Some simulations have proposed a 1.57 percent uniform contribution rate on employment income for the baseline scenario as a way to assure revenue-neutrality to the system as a whole. Yet, this would create strong imbalances, since a uniform contribution rate does not assure revenue-neutrality at the Member State level. The risk is that some countries would be forced to demand higher taxes on wages from their taxpayers. Fiscal obstacles are accompanied by institutional ones, the most important being the high fragmentation of the EMU’s labour markets. Shaping a “one-size-fits-all” model seems rather unrealistic to many.

Additionally, establishing a common unemployment insurance for the Eurozone requires a certain legal framework to be set. Although the Lisbon Treaty envisages “solidarity” as one of the key elements which binds all the members of the Union, article 125 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFUE) also prevents fiscal transfers among Member States. For this reason, the implementation of the scheme would imply either a change of the Lisbon Treaty or at least a new intergovernmental agreement. Another argument opposing the EUI is the so-called “moral hazard”, both ex-ante and ex-post. The former means that countries could be tempted to reduce domestic stabilisers to benefit more from the common scheme. The latter warns that national governments could use funds for purposes which are not suitable for stabilisation, but which are more desirable in political terms. Finally, some analysts claim that a basic EUI would create disincentives to reform national labour markets, while others question its stabilisation impact. In precise terms, they argue that the scheme would better address short-term rather than long-term unemployment, thus being more effective during short recessions than in long downturns.

Why Is The EUI A Desirable Tool?

A common unemployment insurance for the Euro area nonetheless seems a necessary step to be taken for several reasons. A basic EUI would have a strong stabilisation impact. Several studies have revealed that the scheme would have absorbed 36 percent of the unemployment shock in 2009. Moreover, it would increase the number of people covered by an unemployment benefit scheme, for instance the self-employed – representing 39 percent and 27 percent of total workers in Greece and Italy respectively – who are often excluded from any basic unemployment protection system. Permanent transfers can be tackled as an issue by setting precise thresholds and criteria that do not reduce too much the generosity of the scheme. Furthermore, effective mechanisms can be created in order to avoid the emergence of “moral hazard”. On the one hand, a “rulebook” for macroeconomic stabilisation policies could be established, setting agreed minimum standards as well as effective mechanisms, which could even lead to the suspension of a country’s participation in the scheme in case of persistent violations of those standards. On the other hand, in order to prevent ex-post moral hazard, funds should be earmarked in a way ensuring that they are spent effectively by preventing cuts in unemployment benefits schemes. The EUI would also be a powerful driver for structural labour market reforms. It would increase the incentive for making labour markets more flexible, since some of the short-term costs will be covered at the EU level. Additionally, as States will still hold primary responsibility for tackling long-term unemployment, these costs will not be shifted to the other members. Reforming the EMU labour markets would strongly reduce existing fragmentation, leading to a higher harmonisation within the Eurozone. A convergence towards best practice models in the EMU – in terms of generosity and stabilisation capacity – would not only smoothe existing differences but also limit the discrepancies in wage developments. A more integrated social welfare system will definitely improve the functioning of the EMU, boosting labour mobility and making the conduct of monetary policy easier.

Giving A “Human Face” To The EU

A basic, targeted and temporary EUI represents a feasible and effective tool to tackle future asymmetric shocks within the EMU. It would give a “human face” to the EU integration process, with policies that have a concrete and far-reaching impact in the everyday lives of the EU’s citizens. Making social policies and employment among the main pillars of the EMU would ensure that extra labour market flexibility is balanced by adequate levels of social protection. A renovated debate on a basic EUI would thus help to address the Eurozone’s weaknesses and to strengthen the long-term sustainability of the common currency. An EUI would not be the silver bullet for all the EMU’s fiscal problems, but it could definitely give a clear signal that the union is moving ahead and not going into reverse.

Daniele Fattibene

Daniele Fattibene works as a junior researcher in the Security and Defence programme at IAI, where he collaborates mainly on research projects dealing with security and defence issues at the national and European levels. He holds a BA from the University of Naples “L’Orientale” as well as a MA degree from the School of Political Sciences of the University of Bologna (Forlì Campus).



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834676 bcba 6b2b3e733ce2 1 The End of an Era: What’s Next After Globalisation?Apostolos Thomadakis
u4219834674a bf1a 0f45ab446295 0 Germany’s Subcontracting Ban in the Meat IndustryŞerife Erol, Anneliese Kärcher, Thorsten Schulten and Manfred Walser
u4219834dafae1dc3 2 EU’s New Fiscal Rules: Balancing Budgets with Green and Digital AmbitionsPhilipp Heimberger
u42198346d1f0048 1 The Dangerous Metaphor of Unemployment “Scarring”Tom Boland and Ray Griffin
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp