Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Global cities
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Ukraine And EU Enlargement 10 Years After Big Bang

Jan Marinus Wiersma 30th April 2014

Jan Marinus Wiersma, EU Enlargement

Jan Marinus Wiersma

While the world watches nervously the developments in Ukraine, one cannot but ask oneself what would have happened if the EU (and/or NATO for that matter) had incorporated this country following the events of 2004, the Orange Revolution. Then as now Brussels refused to consider the country a viable candidate for membership. In fact the EU looked in other directions for further enlargements: Turkey,  the Western Balkans and Iceland.

And it remains to be seen, as some suggest, that if we had started an accession process with Ukraine in those years, we would have had more stable governments in Kiev and today’s problems could have been avoided. None of the governments that have presided over the country since the collapse of the Soviet Union has ever seriously attempted to overcome the internal divide between East and West and give clear direction to the country.

Protecting own interest groups has often come first. And thus the Orange coalition collapsed to be replaced by its ousted predecessors. And even if there had been consensus about – say – a pro-European orientation, the question remains whether the country’s elites would have been prepared to promote a drastic transformation and follow the reform path that is the essential part of the EU accession process.

I am writing this because 2004 – 1st May to be exact – was also the year thin which we admitted eight countries from Central and Eastern Europe into the EU. Those bordering on Russia will be very happy with the political protection that the present situation offers. The accession of these countries was called the Big Bang, with Malta and Cyprus making ten new members. It was an audacious step of the EU, partly politically motivated to wind up a process that had started in 1993 with the formulation of the accession criteria. The risk of instability caused by a further postponement was the main argument for not taking more time for the preparations.

It, however, created a backlash starting in the same year – public opinion turned against further enlargements in some of the key EU countries. This changed the debate. Given the commitments already made to Turkey and the Western Balkans, a new line was drawn excluding countries like Ukraine, Moldova or Georgia. They were to be good friends but not potential candidates for membership. So, in all honesty, even if these countries had made remarkable progress – which they did not – the door to the EU would have remained closed.

The European Union after the enlargement of 2004. (photo: EU audiovisual library)

The European Union after the enlargement of 2004 (photo: EU audiovisual library)

So will there be nothing to celebrate on 1st May? Should we assess  –  with hindsight – 2004 as a somewhat unlucky year producing an unpopular enlargement and an Orange Revolution that in the end failed to carry the country forward? That would be totally unfair to those in Central and Eastern Europe or Ukraine who saw the EU as an anchor of democratic stability – as the place to be. Most of them still do. The EU is more popular in Poland than in most of the older member states.

Altogether EU membership has been positive for the countries that joined in 2004. They have shown higher growth rates and thus contributed to better figures for the EU as a whole. They were able to reduce the income gap, though it still remains high as do national income inequalities. The political integration went smoothly – contrary to expectations. Poland did not turn out to be the US’s Trojan Horse but instead – like most other new member states – contributed constructively to the constitutional  debates and to the decision-making on monetary and economic issues.

In retrospect, it is not market integration as such or the political incorporation that create divisions ten year after the fact. In these areas we have seen an impressive transformation. Major investments have changed the face of many cities and regions. But the software of these societies has not undergone such rapid change. Habits die slowly. It is a lack of administrative capacity and weak institutions that create distrust in some of the older member states (the Netherlands being an example). Proper rules and their proper implementation, in particular when it concerns the rule of law, are not only essential European values but also necessary elements of good functioning markets. Since it would be counterproductive to single out countries (with the exception of Bulgaria and Romania who are still subject to the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism), the better option is to make the EU responsible for overall quality control with the establishment of an EU rule of law mechanism. Initiatives with that purpose have recently been taken.

The second vulnerable area is the freedom of movement of workers. Instead of acerbating the problems by denying them, Brussels should help taking steps to tackle exploitation, abuse and unfair competition that are caused by labour practices that should not be allowed in a Union where social progress is still one of the guiding principles. It should not be disregarded as just a problem of some of the richer countries. Anything that undermines popular trust in the EU, damages the EU as a whole.

By jointly investing in the quality of our societies, whether it concerns the rule of law or the social fabric, the tide can be turned. No one has to exit the EU. But we have to be aware that in today’s political climate a repetition of 2004 would be impossible. We should be glad we did it then and created a zone of stability to the East of the old EU of the fifteen. As regards Ukraine nothing has changed. The option of EU membership has even become less likely since it is even more difficult than in 2004 to verify with which Ukraine we are dealing with and what will become of the country.

Jan Marinus Wiersma

Jan Marinus Wiersma is a Fellow at the Wiarda Beckman Foundation, an independent social democratic think tank in the Netherlands. Previously, he was a Member of the European Parliament for the Dutch Labour Party (1994-2009) and has published extensively on European issues. He holds a degree in history.

You are here: Home / Politics / Ukraine And EU Enlargement 10 Years After Big Bang

Most Popular Posts

Russia,information war Russia is winning the information warAiste Merfeldaite
Nanterre,police Nanterre and the suburbs: the lid comes offJoseph Downing
Russia,nuclear Russia’s dangerous nuclear consensusAna Palacio
Belarus,Lithuania A tale of two countries: Belarus and LithuaniaThorvaldur Gylfason and Eduard Hochreiter
retirement,Finland,ageing,pension,reform Late retirement: possible for many, not for allKati Kuitto

Most Recent Posts

European Health Data Space,EHDS,Big Tech Fostering public research or boosting Big Tech?Philip Freeman and Jan Willem Goudriaan
migrant workers,non-EU Non-EU migrant workers—the ties that bindLilana Keith
ECB,European Central Bank,deposit facility How the ECB’s ‘deposit facility’ subsidises banksDavid Hollanders
migrant,Europe,workers All work and low pay—Europe’s migrant workforceAnkita Anand
art,European,prize The case for a European prize for artNed Hercock

Other Social Europe Publications

strategic autonomy Strategic autonomy
Bildschirmfoto 2023 05 08 um 21.36.25 scaled 1 RE No. 13: Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care
front cover Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI European Collective Bargaining Report 2022 / 2023

With real wages falling by 4 per cent in 2022, workers in the European Union suffered an unprecedented loss in purchasing power. The reason for this was the rapid increase in consumer prices, behind which nominal wage growth fell significantly. Meanwhile, inflation is no longer driven by energy import prices, but by domestic factors. The increased profit margins of companies are a major reason for persistent inflation. In this difficult environment, trade unions are faced with the challenge of securing real wages—and companies have the responsibility of making their contribution to returning to the path of political stability by reducing excess profits.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The four transitions and the missing one

Europe is at a crossroads, painfully navigating four transitions (green, digital, economic and geopolitical) at once but missing the transformative and ambitious social transition it needs. In other words, if the EU is to withstand the storm, we do not have the luxury of abstaining from reflecting on its social foundations, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. It is against this background that the ETUI/ETUC publishes its annual flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe 2023, with the support of more than 70 graphs and a special contribution from two guest editors, Professors Kalypso Nikolaidïs and Albena Azmanova.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound Talks: housing

In this episode of the Eurofound Talks podcast, Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound’s senior research manager, Hans Dubois, about the issues that feed into housing insecurity in Europe and the actions that need to be taken to address them. Together, they analyse findings from Eurofound’s recent Unaffordable and inadequate housing in Europe report, which presents data from Eurofound’s Living, working and COVID-19 e-survey, European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions and input from the Network of Eurofound Correspondents on various indicators of housing security and living conditions.


LISTEN HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The summer issue of the Progressive Post magazine by FEPS is out!

The Special Coverage of this new edition is dedicated to the importance of biodiversity, not only as a good in itself but also for the very existence of humankind. We need a paradigm change in the mostly utilitarian relation humans have with nature.

In this issue, we also look at the hazards of unregulated artificial intelligence, explore the shortcomings of the EU's approach to migration and asylum management, and analyse the social downside of the EU's current ethnically-focused Roma policy.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube