Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Europe’s utilities: net zero or not zero?

Sarah Brown 10th February 2022

Europe’s largest energy companies are failing on their net-zero pledges.

utilities,power,electricity,net zero,wind,solar
Too many of these still across Europe (DesignRage/shutterstock.com)

Europe’s power sector must achieve rapid cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions this decade to deliver an economy-wide ‘net zero’ by 2050. Needless to say, Europe’s leading energy companies will play a critical role in this transformation. Yet according to a report by Ember and Europe Beyond Coal (EBC), their business plans fail to put in place the necessary steps.

There is no time to lose: this critical mid-century goal will be an ever-receding horizon without ambitious near-term targets. A rapid acceleration in renewables is required to displace coal by 2030 and to achieve 100 per cent clean electricity by 2035. No major utility in Europe is, however, on track to achieve these key milestones—although most have made speculative and rather unconvincing pledges to get to net zero.

They should be taking that goal more seriously: the 2021 European Climate Law legally binds European Union institutions and member states to the Green Deal objectives of reducing emissions by at least 55 per cent by 2030 and achieving a net-zero-emissions economy by 2050. Financial institutions are meanwhile making their own net-zero pledges, yet their commitments will be impossible to realise if the actions of their power-utility clients are not so aligned.

Core milestones


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Last May, the International Energy Agency (IEA) published Net Zero by 2050, a roadmap for the energy sector worldwide to limit global heating to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels. It revealed that half of the necessary carbon-dioxide cuts this decade had to come from the power sector and that advanced economies must lead the way.

The report detailed core milestones that must be achieved. All unabated coal plants must be phased out in advanced economies by 2030 and in all economies by 2040. Electricity must achieve net-zero emissions in advanced economies by 2035 and globally by 2040. Renewables generation needs to more than triple from 2020 levels, to account for 60 per cent of total electricity generation by 2030, which means wind and solar will need to grow six-fold.

An obvious question followed: given these unambiguous and evidence-based targets, were Europe’s utilities on track?

Limited utility

In the Ember/EBC report, Limited Utility, we explored the extent to which European power companies are capable of meeting these global ambitions, set by the IEA. We investigated whether the strategies of 21 major EU coal-burning utilities corresponded to the urgent need to decarbonise their electricity production and accelerate the deployment of renewables.

It is all very well to have distant 2050 pledges but these will not be achieved without immediate action. So the analysis examined the shorter-term transition plans of the organisations. The traffic-light pattern of the graphic encapsulates the detailed findings.

How do Europe’s utilities stack up?

Progress to net zero of European power utilities

Even on coal, the majority of utilities fall short. Despite 16 of the 21 power utilities having pledged to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, their current plans are not compatible with the required emissions cuts and technology deployment. Several do not even fully disclose their annual emissions.

Only nine (43 per cent) of the analysed utilities have committed to phase out coal in the EU or the wider area of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) by 2030—a priority net-zero objective and arguably the easiest to achieve. The significant laggards are PGE, Enea, Tauron, Sev.En, RWE, BEH, ČEZ, Fortum/Uniper, EPH, STEAG and EnBW. Six of these are not even compliant with the 2040 global deadline: Enea, Fortum/Uniper, PGE, Sev.En, STEAG and Tauron.

The total installed global coal capacity of the assessed utilities is approximately 108 gigawatts. This will only have decreased by 59GW (-55 per cent) to 49GW in 2030 on current plans. To align with the IEA’s 2030 EU/OECD coal phase-out target, 95 per cent (103GW) of this capacity should have shut down by then, with only 6GW remaining in the system outside the EU/OECD area. So 43GW of coal capacity demands urgent action to achieve closure by 2030 and a further 6GW by 2040.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Europe is still in denial about fossil gas. It has been scientifically recognised that limiting global heating to 1.5C is imperative and there is an overwhelming consensus that this cannot be achieved without the rapid and complete decarbonisation of the power sector. Major economies such as Germany and the United Kingdom acknowledge this and have already committed to zero-carbon electricity by 2035. These events, combined with the European gas crisis, have substantially diminished the viability of fossil gas as a transition fuel.

Yet the assessed utilities have over 180GW of global installed fossil-gas capacity, 118GW of which is located in the EU/OECD. On future fossil-gas use, transparency and clarity on the part of the power companies is universally lacking.

The information we were able to collect would bring the anticipated installed post-2035 fossil-gas capacity to 197GW globally. In the EU/OECD, that would equate to 135GW. So the utilities have a considerable task ahead to decarbonise their advanced-economy fossil-gas portfolios by 2035 and globally by 2040.

Renewables are accelerating, but not rapidly enough. The IEA’s roadmap for clean electricity entails a substantial step-up in renewable sources, led by wind and solar which by 2030 should comprise 40 per cent of all generation. This requires a sixfold increase in their share of the electricity mix from 2020 in absolute terms. Of the new clean electricity generation from now to 2040, 75 per cent is expected to come from wind and solar alone.

In 2020, renewables accounted for 34 per cent of the total installed capacity of the assessed utilities. At 88GW, their combined wind and solar assets equated to 14 per cent of that capacity. The report found that total wind and solar capacity will increase by 340GW to 428GW in 2030—comfortably quadrupling.

The scale of growth, however, varies considerably across the power utilities and three (Drax, Sev-En and BEH) demonstrate no willingness to participate in the expansion of wind and solar. And many of the companies leading the way on their deployment—most notably Enel, ENGIE, EDF, Iberdrola and RWE—will remain heavily implicated in fossil fuels beyond the timelines required for net zero by 2050.

Noticeably absent

The report found that the assessed European electricity utilities’ net-zero commitments did not correspond to the ambition required by the IEA roadmap. Credible plans to decommission the entire fossil-fuel fleet were noticeably absent. The overall transition plans of the utilities, with or without their own net-zero targets, are widely out of touch with the necessary timelines for fossil fuel phase-out and wind and solar escalation in electricity generation.

All the power utilities must urgently prioritise detailed disclosure of how they intend to align their actions with their pledges and the net-zero requirements. Ecologically obsolete capacity must be rapidly scrapped in favour of significantly higher dependence on renewables—in particular wind and solar—than the companies’ investment plans yet manifest. Shareholders and financial institutions need to scrutinise the utilities’ strategies and insist on ambitious sectoral targets—firmer, more transparent and less speculative.

The energy companies need to be challenged on their lack of detail. A net-zero pledge without a clear plan of action to achieve it is patently not zero.

Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is a senior energy and climate analyst at the think-tank Ember. She is focused on fossil power phase-out in Europe.
You are here: Home / Ecology / Europe’s utilities: net zero or not zero?

Most Popular Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse

Most Recent Posts

EU social agenda,social investment,social protection EU social agenda beyond 2024—no time to wasteFrank Vandenbroucke
pension reform,Germany,Lindner Pension reform in Germany—a market solution?Fabian Mushövel and Nicholas Barr
European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
artists,cultural workers Europe’s stars must shine for artists and creativesIsabelle Van de Gejuchte
transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube