Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Greek Pensions: Tsipras’ Last Ditch Fight Versus Troika

by Marcello Minenna on 16th March 2016 @MarcelloMinenna

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Marcello Minenna

Marcello Minenna

The Troika is in Athens and will not leave without deep cuts to pensions, even though the country is back in recession. Far from last summer’s media glare, a renewed clash of powers is on course between the Troika and the Tsipras government that could severely impact upon the exhausted Greek economy. Among the controversial 48 points of August’s “armistice” was the pension reform: the Troika requesting cuts of over €1.1 billion in 2016, to be obtained via a 6% increase in mandatory contributions from pensioners to the health system. De facto this measure could be a deadly shock for an economy where the total expenditure on pensions reaches 13.5% of GDP.

So it’s not surprising that the Parliament has been stalled since October 2015 around different unviable hypotheses of cuts, trying meanwhile to unlock further tranches of financial aid from the ESM. In November attention focused on the recapitalization of the banking system; at least €15 billion of fresh capital was necessary to avert a looming bail-in of depositors, whose accounts were still blocked (it’s worth remembering) by the capital controls imposed by the ECB in June 2015. This recapitalization has finally taken place: €5.3 billion of new market resources have been injected into the banking system, while senior and junior bondholders have been bailed in via a forced conversion into equity, enduring a loss of 60% of the invested capital. This maneuver has freed up a further €3.4 billion of capital. The ESM, after the apocalyptic projections of a €25 billion involvement made during the July psychodrama, has limited its intervention to €5 billion of contingent convertible instruments, in other terms a limited, cashless capital injection.

Up to now, the ESM has reluctantly thrown the battered Greek public finances € 16billion; predictably, they have already disappeared into a black hole formed by maturing debts and salary expenses. The financial emergency endured by the government has never abated and in February the Troika re-imposed its physical presence in Athens. The official reason is the first review of the ESM program but the Greek political establishment is perfectly aware that the Troika is there to enforce the pension cuts.

The stark fact is that the Greek pension system is tottering on a perilous cliff in terms of sustainability: at the end of 2015 over 50% of the financial inflows of pension funds were represented by direct government transfers (which in turn are funded by new debt), while the contribution of the employed is continuing to shrink steadily: from €24 to € 17billion in less than five years. It could be an argument it would be impolite to highlight in official EU circles, but it’s incontestable that the destruction of the financial health of Hellenic pension funds can be entirely attributed to the sharp increase in the unemployment rate from 9% to 27% and to the reduction of the average annual salary from €13,330 to €10,300, all direct consequences of the two previous Troika programs of “aid”.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

The Greek pension system has undoubtedly been lavish and unbalanced towards users, but the Troika “cure” has undermined its sustainability despite a steep cut of up to €10billion in government spending between 2010 and 2015.

The uninterrupted payment of pensions has been one of the few factors that have averted a vertical collapse of the Greek economy in the wake of the third bailout. The system has found a precarious equilibrium at a lower level: after an aborted rebound in the 2nd quarter of 2015 (just before the acute phase of the crisis), Greece’s GDP has relapsed into contraction mode, while deflation has never disappeared from the radar screens, with prices falling uninterruptedly for 34 months out of 35.

Hence the economy of Greece is skating on wafer-thin ice and any “reform” that the Troika manages to snatch will worsen the situation. Probably the Troika will get what it wants. One can infer it simply by observing the changing attitude of the government in recent weeks, from the sharp rebuttal of IMF requests at the end of February (no more cuts!) to the concessions shown in the latest public declarations (possible cuts for pensions over €1300 ). On the debt side, the concessions granted to the Greek government have been very modest: the talks are centered around a simple freeze till 2022. Only after full implementation of the required reforms, a partial anchoring of the reimbursements to the performance of the GDP (the growth bonds in the initial Varoufakis proposal) may be on the table. But, with ongoing deflation, the size of this debt cannot help but balloon out of control.

In the meantime, the refugee crisis in Greece is also slowly spinning out of control, exerting a mounting pressure on public finances. The Troika has explicitly excluded any connection with its evaluation of the program: any easing of the requirements would be considered as an aid (even!). As was to be expected, the third aid program is retracing the sad path of the first two: wasting financial resources, depressing the real economy and worsening the debt problem to unprecedented depths.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Greek Pensions: Tsipras’ Last Ditch Fight Versus Troika

Filed Under: Economy

About Marcello Minenna

Marcello Minenna is head of the quantitative analysis unit in Consob (the Italian Securities and Exchange Commission). He has taught quantitative finance at Bocconi University and at the London Graduate School of Mathematical Finance. He is a regular writer for the Wall Street Journal and Corriere della Sera and is a member of an advisory group which supports the economic analysis of the biggest Italian trade union, CGIL.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards