Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

One virus, diverse impacts: the pandemic and women in central and eastern Europe

by Daša Šašić Šilović on 16th July 2020 @CEEGENDERNET

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Against the backdrop of its specific histories, the impact of the pandemic on women particularly in the Balkans also demands specific attention.

women in central and eastern europe, women in the Balkans
Daša Šašić Šilović

Controlling the Covid-19 pandemic and the immediate healing are the priority. But the pandemic has unearthed fissures and structural deficiencies in our societies and governing systems. It is a wake-up call and an unexpected—possibly catalytic—opportunity to forge a sustainable new European future. The progressive and social-democratic family is advocating transformative policies for a just transition, for a more equitable social Europe, for ambitious and bold recovery plans.   

Women have borne a sizeable burden of the pressures of the pandemic and the lockdown. They comprise most medical staff, caregivers, domestic workers, teachers, service and social workers. Lockdown measures have resulted in multiple problems for women and families—from domestic violence and increased childcare challenges, including home education, to financial hardships, especially for part-time and seasonal workers.

Through recognising these differentiated needs and applying a gender-sensitive lens to the recovery strategies and the associated deployment of European Union resources, we can ensure gender-equality concerns are mainstreamed in future policies. Within that, the Central and Eastern European Network for Gender Issues, in co-operation with PES Women, has analysed the specific situation of women during the crisis in the Balkan region and explored solutions to the social and economic challenges they face in the wake of the pandemic.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Diminished investments

This region has gone through five economic shocks—if we exclude the Balkan conflict itself—from the transition period to the 2008 economic and financial crisis. Each has affected the very fabric of societies, with neoliberal measures and diminished investments in social and human capital creating more poverty, especially among the most vulnerable.

Serbia is expecting a deep recession in the autumn, deeper than the one in 2008. This would mean fewer resources, especially for social spending, as governments focus on economic stimuli. In most Balkan countries about a third of the population live under the poverty threshold. Even in a more developed EU member such as Croatia every fourth child, according to UNICEF, cannot afford a hot meal at school. Social transfers and one-off financial injections (in Serbia €100 to pensioners, for instance) are palliative measures.

During the coronavirus crisis family and societal relationships have also been changing—from the negative rise in psychological and physical violence to the positive intergenerational (even inter-ethnic in Bosnia-Herzegovina) solidarity and support. Multi-generational families in the Balkans are more the norm than an exception, providing care for the elderly and children and mutual family support, including financial. So far these demands have fallen primarily on women’s shoulders, however—both those who are working outside the home (as a double or triple burden) and elderly female pensioners.

The crisis will be felt more in the social sectors, such as care and education, where women dominate. We are witnessing changing labour patterns, such as home-based work with both parents working from home, women as emerging breadwinners (since most are employed in the service sector), part-time and precarious contracts and a rise in unemployment. These will also affect social patterns of care work (for children and the elderly, with men taking more responsibility), as well as social mobility. They will demand that we revisit our social-welfare systems to adapt to the new circumstances or, at least, address their pitfalls.

Enhanced polarisation

We should be ready for a new social stratification as a result of the new economic and social circumstances. The lower-middle and especially the working class will be sliding into poverty. There will also be enhanced polarisation between those working in industrial sectors and those employed in the public sector, especially in terms of contracts, remuneration and job security.

A new ‘stratification’ is emerging too through the lockdown and online schooling. While governments have made an effort to provide web-based curricula and classes, there is increased evidence of the burden it has created for parents who, apart from being playmates, care-givers, domestics and online workers, had to be educators—to monitor, if not assist, the child’s education and school performance. But limited attention and support was given to children of disadvantaged parents, marginalised children, those living in rural areas without computer and internet facilities and those whose parents are unable to provide guidance and ensure educational support. The gaps created in this situation are still there, including as we look to the autumn.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

An additional problem which has arisen in providing social care has been the declining certainty of remittances from the many who left the region to seek a better future, initially because of the wars associated with the collapse of Yugoslavia and later to seek employment, better wages and working conditions in a more democratic, less corrupt environment. The shortage of medical staff, from nurses to doctors, due to their ‘migration’ to wealthier countries in western Europe, is meanwhile overstretching health and social-care systems in the region.

One continent

Coming back to the wider European canvas, we need to ‘retool’—to address the consequences of neoliberal policies for our social-welfare systems, to synchronise the new labour patterns and social structures and to address inequalities, including gender inequalities, and rising poverty. A renewed Europe after the pandemic cannot have gender equality as an afterthought: this must be an integral part of political decision-making and of economic and social policies.

The EU has to support sustainable development and human capacities in its neighbourhood, because we are one continent which needs stability and progress. Maybe this is the opportunity for a Europe-wide restart, akin to that after the second world war yet before the cold war began.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ One virus, diverse impacts: the pandemic and women in central and eastern Europe

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: coronavirus, gender inequality

About Daša Šašić Šilović

Daša Šašić Šilović is chair of the international board of the Central and Eastern European Network for Gender Issues.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards