Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

The German Minimum Wage Is Not A Job Killer

by Ronald Janssen on 9th September 2015 @JanssenRonald1

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Ronald Janssen

Ronald Janssen

Mainstream economists excel in scaremongering about the dismal effects any policy that tries to correct market forces may have on economic performance. By arguing that such a policy will destroy jobs, things are even turned upside down. Because of the presumed job losses, social policy suddenly becomes anything but social while liberal economic policy is actually the best social policy you can get.

Nowhere can this be seen more clearly than in the discussion on minimum wages. Indeed, the standard argument is that a minimum wage will automatically destroy those jobs that are less productive, thereby barring workers, in particular low skilled workers, from a job. In other words, the main effect of minimum wages is to create ‘outsiders’ for whom the higher minimum wage is of no benefit since they are out of a job altogether.

This, at least, is the narrative developed by the mainstream. What about the reality? Here, the experience of Germany with the introduction in January 2015 of a national minimum wage of €8.50 an hour is highly instructive.

The 200.000 Jobs That Did NOT Disappear

As expected, the plan to introduce a minimum wage was met with alarmist warnings from mainstream economist headquarters. For example, in their joint spring 2014 forecast, the German economic institutes warned of 200.000 jobs being destroyed and of a visible and immediate increase in unemployment from January 2015 onwards. However, what happened is the exact opposite. Unemployment in Germany has not increased but continues to go down instead. It fell by 250.000 from over 3m in January to 2.7m in July 2015 (latest available data).

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Moreover, comparing this year’s trend with the previous year shows that unemployment has actually been falling at a faster pace after the minimum wage was introduced. As can be seen from the graph below, the number of unemployed has fallen at a rate between 3.3% and 4.3% each month between January 2015 and July 2015 (compared with the number of unemployed in the same month of the previous year). Over the course of 2014, unemployment was also falling but at a much slower pace, between minus 0.1 and minus 1.5%.

1

Bundesbank: Minimum Wage Drives Out Bad Jobs….

Even the Bundesbank, which had also been warning on the job effects of the minimum wage, has now been forced to change its story. In its monthly report of August 2015, it admits that “the impact of the introduction of the minimum wage on the total volume of work appears to be very limited in the present business cycle”. In other words, the Bundesbank sees no sign whatsoever of the minimum wage destroying jobs.

At the same time, the Bundesbank also points to the important (and beneficial!) shifts that are going on behind the aggregate numbers. While the notorious German mini jobs paying a maximum of €400 a month are being largely scrapped, there is at the same time an equally large creation of regular jobs paying normal social security contributions. In April and May alone, no less than 125.000 additional jobs covered by normal social security were created. This phenomenon is particularly manifest in those sectors where half of all German low-wage workers are employed (retail, hotels, transport and other services). According to the Bundesbank, in these sectors alone the number of regular employment contracts increased by 60,000 over and above the usual increase observed in recent years (!).

In other words, the effect of the minimum wage in Germany is not to destroy jobs but to force employers to offer “regular” jobs, jobs that are covered by social security and pay this €8.50 an hour wage. It confirms what trade unions have been saying for many years: Labour market flexibility does not create new jobs. Instead, flexibility mainly drives the good jobs out of the labour market by allowing employers to transform existing and regular jobs into precarious and/or badly paid jobs.

…While Boosting Wage Dynamics

Equally positive is the minimum wage’s impact on the wages of particular groups of workers. Workers in eastern Germany with the lowest level of education or training saw their wages rise by a robust 6% to 9% in the first quarter of 2015 whereas the increase for managerial and highly qualified staff in the same region was limited to 3%. The graphs below (respectively western and eastern Germany) provide more detail on those sectors where the minimum wage has had the greatest impact. Some spectacular increases can be observed with those in specific sectors far exceeding the average wage increase.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

2

Overall, the Bundesbank estimates that the introduction of the minimum wage has increased average wages in Germany by 0.5%, possibly even by 1%.  In fact, it also notes that, thanks to the minimum wage, ‘wage drift’ has turned positive again: Actually paid wages have increased a bit faster than collectively bargained wages in the first half of 2015 and this after zero or even slightly negative wage drift in the two previous years.

What About The Effect On The Business Cycle?

The Bundesbank would of course not be the Bundesbank if it didn’t add some form of caveat. This comes in the form of the argument that negative job effects are not visible because the minimum wage has been introduced at the same time as Germany is benefiting from an economic upswing. In other words, according to this argument, it is the process of growth that is driving job creation, thereby providing a distorted picture of the impact of the minimum wage on jobs.

It is certainly correct to say that Germany is experiencing a more pronounced economic recovery than many other euro area countries. However, German growth dynamics should not be overstated either. In fact, comparing it in the first half of 2015 with the same period in 2014 shows that the expansion of economic activity in both years was rather modest and also almost identical. In cumulative terms, it was 0.6% over the first half of 2014 and 0.7% in 2015. That is scarcely a big difference.

3

If, with economic activity expanding in 2015 at a similar pace as before, unemployment goes down faster and this despite the introduction of a minimum wage, then the Bundesbank argument of “a rising tide lifts all boats and blurs the picture” is decidedly beside the point.

Europe Needs To Think Again

When reading the stream of documents coming out of the European Semester process, one is struck by how much the Commission’s analysis is dominated by mainstream economic thinking when it argues time after time that wages should be in line with productivity at the level of individual companies and individual workers. Such a view creates a profound bias against minimum wages, as can be seen again from the latest batch of country specific analyses and recommendations where France, Slovenia, Croatia and Belgium receive clear warnings on the effect of minimum wages on job performance.

Such warnings, however, look rather silly after the experience of Germany. The introduction of a rather high minimum wage (€8.50  represents 50% of the median German wage!) resulted in higher wages in general, in substantially higher wages for the lowest paid, in mini jobs being replaced by regular jobs while job creation continues and the trend fall in unemployment even accelerates. Mainstream economic analysis is definitely wrong. The Commission should wake up and smell the coffee.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ The German Minimum Wage Is Not A Job Killer

Filed Under: Politics

About Ronald Janssen

Ronald Janssen is working as economic policy adviser at the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD (TUAC).

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards