Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

The Refugees’ Tsunami In Italy Turns Out To Be Just A Ripple

by Marcela Gola Boutros on 2nd October 2018

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Marcela Gola Boutros

Marcela Gola Boutros

Let’s face the truth about immigration in Italy: the country is not overloaded by millions of refugees. In fact, the majority of people who arrived on the Italian coast during recent years didn’t even have the chance to become refugees. They arrived as asylum-seekers and were compelled to leave as illegal immigrants.

In 2017, out of 81,527 asylum claimants, only 8 percent (6,827) were granted refugee status, another 8 percent (6,880) received subsidiary protection and 25 percent (20,166) were given humanitarian protection – a sort of “lower-level” asylum, issued by the Police Department, that allows its holders to stay in the country for up to two years. The largest proportion of the requests – 58 percent (46,992) – were denied, that is, these immigrants didn’t receive any kind of international protection. The statistics of the previous years are very similar.

Even though the images shared by the media of boats and boats of “refugees” disembarking on the Italian coast are still very alive in our memories, truth is that those who stay are very few, and the number of people who are sent back to the limbo of displacement isn’t highlighted on the front page of any newspaper.

The new anti-migrant decree, which was unanimously approved by the Italian council of ministers on September 24, is checkmate for the already scanty rights of immigrants who live in the country. The far-right interior minister, Matteo Salvini, was very clear about his priorities earlier this year: “send them home”. And that’s exactly what he is fighting for.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Send ‘em home

A big step to expanding the borders of Italy, the “Salvini Decree” is based on a new set of six criteria governing the award of humanitarian protection to asylum seekers. Besides, it seems that his latest strategy is to criminalize the immigrants even before checking their precedents. He recently accused Tunisia of sending convicts to Italy in migrant boats, causing a diplomatic row. Salvini is engaged in the task of expelling migrants who “endanger society”, but to this day it is still not clear what or whom he considers dangerous – I dare say a different skin colour might be enough to frighten him.

In late August, Salvini joined forces with the Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán, in the aim of creating an anti-migration front to oppose Emmanuel Macron’s and George Soros’ pro-migrant policies. This is anything but a smart move on his part, since Italy should be greeting immigrants with a big smile due to the rapid ageing of its population and the need of a younthful workforce to deal with the pensions problem. According to the Ministry of the Economy and Finance, there were nearly 34 pensioners for every 100 workers in Italy in 2015, and the projections don’t get any better: 60 pensioners are expected for every 100 workers in 2070.

Sending immigrants home is not going to solve this issue, it will only worsen it. In times when the government doesn’t know how to deal with popular dissatisfaction, the tendency is to find a foreign scapegoat to bear the burden of its failures. Therefore, some Italian politicians are trying to point to immigration as the primary cause of all the country’s problems. This is not true, and when the immigrants are expelled they will be forced to look to their own internal problems without having anyone else to blame.

In a small city in southern Italy, there are announcements all over the police headquarters saying: “Do you want to go back to your country of origin? Contact us! Volunteer assisted return and reintegration”. It goes without saying that assisted return is nothing but a joke. A government that makes an agreement with Libya to stop immigrants – more than often through torture and slavery – from fleeing war and persecution can’t be given any credit for an “assisted return” promise.

Hope not hate

I live in Italy, and while I see furious people supporting Salvini’s anti-migrant hate speech, I also see some immigration department workers giving their best efforts to understand the problems of the foreigners and trying to figure out how they can help – even when the only help they can give is to reprehend their rude colleagues who are screaming at asylum-seekers. As a foreign-born resident myself, I can say that experiencing decent treatment given by a government worker is very meaningful. Immigrants are vulnerable and a simple act of kindness puts us in the much more comfortable position of standing up for our rights and looking for solutions to the daily challenges.

I know many people support Salvini and his ideas, I know the people who follow him are desperate for changes because life hasn’t been easy for southern Europeans since the 2008 crisis, but I also know hate is not the answer. I see kind and open-hearted Italians receiving immigrants, being empathic to their suffering, employing them in their businesses – because they know this will make the country prosper, not lead it to ruin. And I ask these Italians, myself included, to do our best spreading the word that immigration is not an Italian problem, it is a solution. Immigration stimulates development, raises diversity and enriches culture. The Italian people are an immigrant people – the historical mass migration to South America of the early 1900s is a proof of it.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

The power of tyrants is given by the people. Without support, they are just ordinary men. We can’t stand idly by while atrocities are encouraged by new laws, we must speak up. As during the Reich cited by Félix Guattari in The Anti-Oedipus: “No, the masses were not deceived, they desired fascism, and that is what has to be explained”.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ The Refugees’ Tsunami In Italy Turns Out To Be Just A Ripple

Filed Under: Politics

About Marcela Gola Boutros

Marcela Gola Boutros is master’s student in Migrations, Inter-ethnicity and Transnationalism at School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal. Her ongoing research focus is on the access to higher education among international protection holders and asylum seekers in Europe.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards