Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Time to ensure climate policy serves the public, not lobbyists

by Colin Roche on 14th November 2019 @ColinRoche

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

The fossil-fuel industry has been revealed to have invested vast resources in lobbying EU institutions.

fossil-fuel
Colin Roche

Greta Thunberg and her fellow school-strikers’ message is resonating across the world—a world that is ready to hear it. Young people and their allies are forcing those in power to face some uncomfortable truths about political inaction in the face of a climate emergency. But a powerful opposition stands in their way, and it is the job of adults to confront it.

Part of the reason climate action has been so weak is that the fossil-fuel lobby has been successful in twisting and delaying it. We must prevent this lobby putting its private interest in continuing to burn coal, gas and oil ahead of the public interest in a liveable planet. A new campaign plans to take on Europe’s fossil-fuel lobby.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the latest person to expose how the fossil-fuel industry has spent millions to deny and obfuscate the reality of global heating—despite knowing the truth that its businesses heat the planet and destroy communities. Simultaneously, it has relentlessly attacked efforts to regulate carbon emissions or put the world on a pathway of clean, renewable energy.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

The most well-known case is the United States, where oil barons such as the Koch brothers have funded candidates, parties and right-wing think tanks to influence politics. They have had good bang for their buck, with the Republican party (as well as some Democrats) almost entirely captured by the oil industry, Trump proudly proclaiming a US pull-out of the Paris agreement, and environmental and climate-change regulations gutted.

Spending big

But the influence of big oil, gas and coal on politics is not confined to the US. With massive profits and a whole business model at stake, fossil-fuel companies are spending big to overwhelm the public interest. Since the 2015 agreement, the world’s five biggest publicly-traded oil and gas companies (three of them headquartered in Europe) have spent more than $1billion on misleading branding and lobbying.

In Brussels, the heart of European climate and energy decision-making, the oil majors and their army of lobby groups maintain a constant bombardment of decision-makers: meetings, advertisements, retreats and sponsored events, to ensure their voice is heard first and most. Our research has found that the big five and their fossil fuel-lobby groups employ 200 Brussels lobbyists, have spent €251 million on lobbying the EU since 2010 and met high level officials in the Juncker commission 327 times (according to their self-declared figures and those of the commission).

Source: Friends of the Earth

Much of this fossil-fuel influence is corporate capture in plain sight. In Brussels, one can’t walk into a metro, read EU media online or surf ‘social media’ without being bombarded by the messages of fossil-fuel companies. EU politicians appear at a continual stream of industry-sponsored events, where lobbyists shape the narrative on energy and climate and chat cosily with key decision-makers. In the UK, the government has even held a cabinet meeting in the offices of Shell. But there are also shadier tactics—climate-denying think tanks, for example, which refuse to declare the origin of their funding while authoring papers suggesting climate change is exaggerated.

There is a constant moulding of European climate, energy and even foreign policy, by those who have most to gain from slowing the transition. The result is the commission’s obsession with supporting new pipelines and infrastructure: 55 gas projects were announced on the outgoing commission’s final day. These  it says are in the ‘common interest’, despite the evidence of the incompatibility of gas and our climate goals.

The result is climate goals that are far short of what’s needed to keep global warming below 1.5C and Europe’s fair share of action. The result is energy efficiency targets that are voluntary and ignored, with energy consumption growing rather than falling. The result is renewable-energy targets that barely stretch beyond the status quo trend.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

Seriously weakened

The influence is also evident in national capitals. In 2017 the then French environment minister, Nicolas Hulot, announced a bill ‘to put an end to hydrocarbons in France’ by phasing out the renewal of fossil-fuel exploitation permits. After extensive lobbying and threats from the private sector, the law was seriously weakened, such that it ended up allowing exploitation permits to be renewed after the 2040 deadline. When Hulot resigned a year later, he cited ‘the presence of lobby groups in the circles of power’.

Meanwhile, the planet has continued to heat, with already devastating consequences for people on every continent and the most vulnerable communities hit hardest.

It is time for the public interest to reassert itself, to ensure the vast majority of the fossil-fuel industry’s gas, oil and coal reserves stay in the ground. So now Friends of the Earth Europe has come together with a number of other organisations, to seek a politics free of the dangerous and overweening influence of fossil-fuel lobbyists on our climate policy. This is their ‘tobacco’ moment.

Almost 200 civil society groups have backed a call for ‘fossil-free politics’—seeking an end to the lobby’s endless access to decision-making, to conflicts of interest and revolving doors, to preferential treatment such as subsidies for fossil fuels and to ‘partnerships’ between governments and those polluting the planet. As with the tobacco industry before it, for our own health we must end the industry’s influence on public policy. There’s no other way to ensure climate policy serves people, not profit.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Politics ・ Time to ensure climate policy serves the public, not lobbyists

Filed Under: Politics

About Colin Roche

Colin Roche is a campaigner with Friends of the Earth Europe.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards