Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Global cities
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Renzi’s Last Call

Alessio Colonnelli 7th May 2018

Alessio Colonnelli

Alessio Colonnelli

Italy’s Democratic Party (PD), the exact equivalent of Labour in Britain, is in total disarray. It came second in the 4 March general election, way behind first-time winners Five Star: scoring 19 percent against 33 percent. Skewered. Utterly embarrassing; yet hardly surprising. PD got an astounding 40 percent in the 2014 EU elections. Now we surmise that that must’ve been the continental left’s swan song.

But really, PD’s trajectory was a foregone conclusion: aside from Jeremy Corbyn’s party (and even then), social democracy across Europe is, if not nosediving, certainly in its worst shape since the 1930s. The scenario is bleak indeed when you consider that one of the few centre-left governments in the EU still in charge – Malta’s – is under tremendous pressure to prove it’s not involved in organised criminal activities.

Similarly, Slovakia’s prime minister Robert Fico had to step down in March after mass protests followed the killing of Ján Kuciak, a journalist who had exposed the incumbent leftist government’s links to the Italian ‘Ndrangheta. This goes to show what millions of disillusioned voters think: left or right, they’re all in it for themselves.

No wonder the self-styled anti-establishment Five Star Movement won. But did it really? Two months on and still no government in sight. After Spain and Germany, here’s another country with a much weaker left – struggling but still alive and kicking, just – on the verge of possibly entering government, but only in a junior role.

Nevertheless, the former prime minister and PD’s de facto leader Matteo Renzi said ‘No’ to Luigi Di Maio and Roberto Fico – (no relation to the Slovak) – the vociferous Five Star chiefs who, together with Alessandro Di Battista (Italian politics’ angriest trio), have spent the past five years relentlessly insulting Renzi like there’s no tomorrow.


Become part of our Community of Thought Leaders


Get fresh perspectives delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for our newsletter to receive thought-provoking opinion articles and expert analysis on the most pressing political, economic and social issues of our time. Join our community of engaged readers and be a part of the conversation.

Sign up here

“Within proportional electoral systems,” household-name Law professor Gustavo Zagrebelsky told the anti-Renzi Il Fatto Quotidiano newspaper, “everyone is called into play to try and win, even against all odds. In the end, of course, you can go into opposition if you’ve failed to negotiate. But [opposition] is not the default choice.”

Renzi’s way

Technically, Renzi’s stance cannot therefore be justified. President Sergio Mattarella asked Fico to enquire whether PD would like to form a government, after Di Maio failed to reach an agreement with allied centre-right parties. (Five Star does not want to deal with Silvio Berlusconi, second in line within such an alliance, having won 14 percent of the vote.) Hence, PD were still officially weighing up Five Star’s offer, despite Renzi, but swung to his side at a decisive meeting on May 3 and formally rejected talks with Five Star.

Renzi thinks that Di Maio as the next prime minister is not a realistic proposition. He told La Repubblica daily: “Hats off to the one who managed to get 33 percent, which is however far from 51 percent. Someone should give him [Di Maio] the 19 percent he needs out of the kindness of their heart, because to come and ask for my support just won’t work, not after I was told I was the cause of all of Italy’s evils – it’d be absurd to try and do that.” But President Mattarella has initiated a further round of consultations with the parties on May 7.

After twenty years of economic stagnation, Italians’ mood is naturally just short of foul. Spain’s per-head gross income is now higher; along with Portugal and Ireland, it has endured more draconian austerity measures than Italy has ever had to, and all three are growing at a much faster rate. Universal basic income promises could be said to have won it for Five Star, even though it never articulated proper labour market policies and antagonising trade unions at every opportunity.

Meanwhile, in Spain

Parallels with Spain are in fact multiple. Five Star share with Podemos a powerful anti-establishment rhetoric: the old system is portrayed as a caste of self-interested politicians. These are set against the general interests of ordinary individuals – society at large. According to this narrative, both socialists and conservatives are responsible, in equal measure, for the political and economic crises in Italy and Spain: Podemos and Five Star want to surpass what they define as the “fictional differences” between left and right. The real chasm lies – here they are in unison with UKIP’s Nigel Farage, their Strasbourg allies, to the tune of hundreds of thousands of euros from the EU – between the “people” and the “establishment.”

It’s a bit like “the 99 percent against the 1 percent” discourse, which denounces the class nature of contemporary capitalism. Podemos, in particular, propose a democratisation aimed at attacking capitalists’ vested interests.

Five Star, on the contrary, reduces Italy’s prolonged struggles to an issue of corruption and lack of pubic spirit (civismo), thus totally ignoring the economic and class dynamics of Italian capitalism. This is far from being sincerely progressive: their agenda is an odd amalgam of common-sense, populist calls plus a dash of right-wing paroles and a drizzle of left-wing slogans for good measure. Five Star have always campaigned for an overturn of the entire establishment but have miserably failed to address why Italy’s corrupted political system began in the first place.

Renzi, for his part, tried to have some wealth redistributed, however clumsily. It was always too little, too late. What he mostly succeeded in doing was alienating the conspicuous far-left current within PD. Eventually, the old communists broke away to join a new party called Sinistra Italiana, or Italian Left.


Support Progressive Ideas: Become a Social Europe Member!


Support independent publishing and progressive ideas by becoming a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month. You can help us create more high-quality articles, podcasts and videos that challenge conventional thinking and foster a more informed and democratic society. Join us in our mission - your support makes all the difference!

Become a Social Europe Member

Last week, inadvertently perhaps, Renzi might have just done the most leftist thing of his entire career: saying ‘No’ to the Five Star MoVement (its full name, where V stands for vaffanculo, or loosely translated, “two fingers”). PD won the previous general election by a whisker and asked Five Star to help it form a government. Today, Renzi’s refusal has the bittersweet taste of a reprisal.

So, maybe there is a slim chance for PD to regroup, from the high-backed opposition benches or not. Those PD deputies around outgoing prime minister Paolo Gentiloni are in favour of negotiating, but they’re in the minority. Although Gentiloni was always a “Renziano” himself, belonging to a certain current does not involve, on this specific issue, following or rejecting Renzi’s view by default. It’ll be a personal choice. Regrouping, after this, may thus commence on an individual basis. The sheer force of dialogue could restart a centre-left party that, after 11 years, is going through a middle-age crisis (politicians are still fairly old in Italy, but organisations are very young indeed).

Never say never. Although you wouldn’t quite call that the rebirth of the centre-left. Too highfalutin. You’d just call it enduring hope, and that would be fine for the time being. That’d be plenty, actually, in the still floundering Bel Paese.

Alessio Colonnelli

Alessio Colonnelli is a freelance writer on Europe; minority rights and regional autonomies; political dissent; and the state of social democracy.

You are here: Home / Politics / Renzi’s Last Call

Most Popular Posts

Belarus,Lithuania A tale of two countries: Belarus and LithuaniaThorvaldur Gylfason and Eduard Hochreiter
dissent,social critique,identity,politics,gender Delegitimising social critique and dissent on the leftEszter Kováts
retirement,Finland,ageing,pension,reform Late retirement: possible for many, not for allKati Kuitto
Credit Suisse,CS,UBS,regulation The failure of Credit Suisse—not just a one-offPeter Bofinger
Europe,transition,climate For a just and democratic climate transitionJulia Cagé, Lucas Chancel, Anne-Laure Delatte and 8 more

Most Recent Posts

work,labour market,pandemic,hours,Gen Z How much work is enough?Anne-Marie Slaughter and Autumn McDonald
poverty,Porto,Social Forum When life gives you lemons, make anti-poverty strategiesEstrella Durá Ferrandis and Alba Huertas Ruiz
LGBT+ rigthts,same-sex couples,civil unions,ECHR Landmark European ruling on LGBT+ rightsNausica Palazzo
boredom,work Rust out: boredom at work can be harmfulValerie van Mulukom
Kılıçdaroğlu,Turkey,Erdoğan Turkey: does Kılıçdaroğlu have a path to victory?Halil Karaveli

Other Social Europe Publications

Bildschirmfoto 2023 05 08 um 21.36.25 RE No. 13: Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care
front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis

ETUI advertisement

The four transitions and the missing one

Europe is at a crossroads, painfully navigating four transitions (green, digital, economic and geopolitical) at once but missing the transformative and ambitious social transition it needs. In other words, if the EU is to withstand the storm, we do not have the luxury of abstaining from reflecting on its social foundations, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. It is against this background that the ETUI/ETUC publishes its annual flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe 2023, with the support of more than 70 graphs and a special contribution from two guest editors, Professors Kalypso Nikolaidïs and Albena Azmanova.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

New Europe-wide survey on living and working conditions

Eurofound, in partnership with the European Training Foundation, has launched a new online survey to document living and working conditions in Europe and the evolving concerns of citizens, amid the cost-of-living crisis, the war in Ukraine and the broader post-Covid-19 context.

The survey is available in 33 languages and is open to everyone over the age of 16. It asks specific questions on perceptions of quality of life and quality of society, as well as working situation, housing and finances.

Add your voice and contribute to the research.


COMPLETE THE SURVEY HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The spring issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The Special Coverage of this new edition is dedicated to Feminist Foreign Policy, to try to gauge its potential but also the risk that it could be perceived as another attempt by the west to impose its vision on the global south.

In this issue, we also look at the human cost of the war in Ukraine, analyse the increasing connection between the centre right and the far right, and explore the difficulties, particularly for women, of finding a good work-life balance and living good working lives.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube