Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Democracy And The Erosion Of The Centre Ground

Paul Collier 7th January 2015

Paul Collier

Paul Collier

According to the simple two-party voting model of Anthony Downs, democracy privileges the centre ground: parties compete to attract the median voter. This is no longer working: the centre ground is losing political power to the extremes.

Across Europe, new populist-extremist parties have broken in: Greece, France, Spain, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands, Scotland and England. The rival mainstream parties face an unenviable choice between allying with the populists, or of working together in coalition. Allying with populist parties legitimizes them as fit for government. Forming a grand coalition gives them equivalently valuable status as the alternative government. Either way, as the economic consequences of the Euro play out over the next few years, the populist parties look set to be Europe’s future.

In the USA, the two-party structure has held intact, but this is probably only because its campaign finance system imposes an absurdly high financial hurdle for political entry. Instead, extremism has infested the established parties. The American constitution, with its strong checks and balances, was designed for consensus. With its demise, America’s political system has generated policy gridlock. Sooner or later, the American government will have to act and it will not be able to do so.

The weakening of the centre ground is liable to produce tragedy: the dysfunctions generated by empowered European populist parties and American gridlock may not be self-rectifying. It is therefore important to understand why the centre is weakening, and what can be done about it.

The centre has been weakened as a result of rising social diversity interacting with outdated voting systems. Political parties are run by activists: in Europe they elect the party leaders, in America they provide the workforce needed to win primary elections. Activism has always been greater among the political extremes, but as diversity has pulled the extremes further apart, so the parties in which they are disproportionately influential, have positioned themselves further from the centre. They are willing to sacrifice some prospect of power for periodic opportunities to implement their undiluted agenda.

Democracy works better in conditions of social consensus, but it cannot build those conditions. On the contrary, party competition is inherently divisive, generating narratives that denigrate opponents and exaggerate differences. This has been exacerbated by the fragmentation of the media: people with different loyalties no longer digest common narratives so that the base of ‘common knowledge’ is eroding. Democratic politics is consequently now polarizing electorates, rather than building a shared understanding of choices.

As politics becomes discredited with moderates, the parties attract activists who have internalized an oppositional identity. In turn, they elect leaders who cater to their agendas. Electorates are then faced with a choice between options which, while very different, are all unappealing. A choice between rival extremes is not what democracy should be delivering. Instead, it should be doing what the simple voting models comfortingly but wrongly predict: providing a choice between mainstream parties that compete to satisfy the centre ground, one of which can be judged on its record in government. How can this be re-established?

The functioning of democracy depends in part upon the design of electoral systems. Some European countries, such as the UK, have systems which do not meet even the most basic standards of legitimacy. But even where party representation broadly corresponds to votes, the parties themselves remain the playthings of unrepresentative elites. The key step is to weaken the power of political activists relative to ordinary citizens. Primaries, in which ordinary voters rather than only the activists choose the party leaders, are potentially the solution. However, as run in America they now fail to do that. With voters registered approximately into thirds as ‘democrats’, ‘republicans’, and ‘independents’, and turnout low, the extremes tend to win the primaries.

With Europe’s increasingly fragmented party system, an American-style system of registering voter allegiance would be even less effective in frustrating the extremes. The alternative is for primaries to be open to all citizens: everyone should be allowed to vote in each of the party leadership elections. Activists would be outraged at their loss of inordinate privilege, but the composition of the political menu, rather than merely the choice from that menu, would be determined democratically. Once leaders were elected by the middle-ground rather than by the extremes, parties would gradually weaken their identification with systematically distinctive ideologies. Instead they would evolve into rival teams of people. A team which had performed badly in government would be removed through an election, which is arguably the most essential aspect of democracy.

Europe is heading for politically dangerous times. Without reform of the democratic process, the status quo will self-destruct.

Paul Collier

Sir Paul Collier is Professor of Economics and Public Policy at the Blavatnik School of Government, Oxford University. His latest book is 'Exodus: Immigration and Multiculturalism in the 21st Century' published by Penguin and Oxford University Press.

You are here: Home / Politics / Democracy And The Erosion Of The Centre Ground

Most Popular Posts

Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic

Most Recent Posts

Pakistan,flooding,floods Flooded Pakistan, symbol of climate injusticeZareen Zahid Qureshi
reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube