Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Disability: EU funding of institutions barely legal

Florian Sanden 7th July 2022

Is the European Commission complying with its obligations under the UN convention on disability to stop funding institutions from the EU budget?

disabled,disability,rights of persons with disabilities,institutions,deinstitutionalisation,European Commission,commission,EU ombudsman,O'Reilly
The UN convention requires the European Commission to support independent living for persons with disabilities (Halfpoint/shutterstock.com)

Since 2011 the European Union has been party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This has obliged the EU to pursue independent living arrangements for disabled individuals, entailing an end to the funding of institutions from EU funds. But the evidence indicates the European Commission has failed to comply with its responsibilities when it comes to the disbursement of monies.

Article 19 of the convention covers living independently and living in the community. It recognises ‘the equal right of all persons with disabilities to live in the community, with choices equal to others’. This includes ‘the opportunity to choose their place of residence and where and with whom they live on an equal basis with others’, being ‘not obliged to live in a particular living arrangement’.

In 2017, the supervisory UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities explained the implications of article 19. It said independent living referred to ‘life settings outside residential institutions of all kinds’. It called for states-party to have deinstitutionalisation policies—closing institutions such as nursing homes, group homes, villages for disabled people or psychiatric facilities with long-term residency.

In 2009 the Council of the EU adhered to the convention and in 2013 the Court of Justice of the EU (ECJ) reaffirmed that the convention had become part of the acquis. Article 17 of the Treaty on European Union meanwhile says of the European Commission: ‘It shall ensure the application of the Treaties, and of measures adopted by the institutions pursuant to them. It shall oversee the application of Union law under the control of the Court of Justice of the European Union.’ The commission is bound to implement the decisions of the council and the ECJ and so is obliged to implement the convention, including article 19.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Strict use

In its concluding observations on the initial report of the EU, published in 2015, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities recommended that the union ‘develop an approach to guide and foster deinstitutionalization and to strengthen the monitoring of the use of the European Structural and Investment Funds so as to ensure that they are used strictly for the development of support services for persons with disabilities in local communities and not for the redevelopment or expansion of institutions’. The EU should also ‘suspend, withdraw and recover payments if the obligation to respect fundamental rights is breached’.

Since the adoption of the convention, the European Network on Independent Living (ENIL) has been collecting data on breaches of this obligation. Its shadow report in February this year published evidence that in Lithuania the government had decided to move 2,700 to 3,000 disabled people out of large institutions but only into group homes or other smaller institutions. For this project €26.5 million from the European structural and investment funds (ESIF) had been used. In the Łódź voivodeship in Poland, between 2014 and 2020 resources from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) specifically had financed institutions with 80-90 residents. In Greece the region of Attica planned to enhance the infrastructure and programmes of institutions with support from ESIF funds.

In July 2020, ENIL filed a complaint to the commission about the investments in Łódź. (In the same year complaints were submitted about the use of EU funds to finance institutions in Romania and Estonia.)

Complaint closed

Last month, ENIL was notified by the commission on the Łódź case that ‘no breach of the applicable Union law in relation to the ERDF co-financing has been demonstrated and therefore the complaint will be closed’. According to the commission’s letter, the Polish government had been approached to supply information and explanations; from the messages received the commission had concluded no EU regulations had been violated. That exchange is not open to public scrutiny.

Rather than focusing on this case, the commission suggested it was more fruitful to discuss the topic ‘in the broader political context of ensuring progress of and strengthening, in a coordinated manner, the deinstitutionalization process in Poland through a continuous dialogue and monitoring exercise that must involve all parties’. The Directorate for Regional and Urban Policy (DG Regio) said it would ‘take additional steps’ with the Polish authorities and the Polish commissioner for human rights, though these were not identified. The process of deinstitutionalisation in Łódź was ‘subject to analyses at national level’, whose outcome would ‘be presented when deemed necessary’.

The commission emphasised that, according to its legal interpretation, more proactive measures were not required because ‘there is no general prohibition for the ESIF funds to support longstay residential institutions’. In any case the financing of institutions represented a transitional measure, since the change from institutional care to community-based support was long and complicated. As a result, it was necessary to allow continued investments in institutions as the member state in question had made ‘progress in general on ensuring independent living’, a position supported by the commission’s legal service.

Ombudsman’s inquiry

In April the EU ombudsman published however the results of an own-initiative inquiry into how the commission monitors the ESIF. The report from Emily O’Reilly said the commission should not base its assessments on information provided by national authorities only—independent sources, such as national and regional ombudsmen, should be taken into account. The commission was encouraged actively to seek contact when in need of input.

The ombudsman added that the commission should be less vague when designing follow-up actions with national authorities. Apparently in the course of a complaint procedure in 2019 it had ‘engaged in intensive dialogue with the Hungarian authorities concerning an EU-funded project that had failed to promote deinstitutionalization’. In this case the commission had intervened and halted the project, raising concerns about the housing model involved. O’Reilly said the commission ‘could adopt this approach more systematically’.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

By allowing investments in institutions as long as the country concerned can present these as transitional measures, the commission is interpreting the legal framework too loosely. In its guidance, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has said that ‘no new long term institutions should be built and that older long-term care residential institutions should not be renovated beyond the most urgent measures necessary to safeguard residents’ physical safety’. Indeed the EU´s 2021 regulation on the application of its funding streams says that member states should ‘respect the obligations set out’ in the convention and that the funds ‘should not support actions that contribute to any form of segregation or exclusion’.

In response to a question from the EU ombudsman, the commission said it would ‘launch infringement proceedings only as a last resort,’ where no agreement could be reached with the member state. It stressed the role of national courts in enforcing EU law.

Clear responsibility

Especially in the case of disability rights, relying on individuals taking governments to court is highly unsatisfactory. Exclusion from access to justice is a widespread phenomenon for disabled people: taking a public body to court requires significant financial and emotional resources they are unlikely to have.

As guardian of the treaties, the commission has a clear responsibility to enforce union law. There are strong indications that its interpretation of the legal situation differs from the assessment of other authoritative bodies.

The commission should instead adopt the view broadly shared by ENIL, the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the EU ombudsman. It needs then to institute more effective procedures to enforce the legal framework on the use of EU funds when it comes to financing institutions accommodating disabled people.

Florian Sanden
Florian Sanden

Florian Sanden is policy co-ordinator at the European Network on Independent Living. A political scientist by training, he is an activist for disability rights, transnational co-operation and social justice.

You are here: Home / Society / Disability: EU funding of institutions barely legal

Most Popular Posts

Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic

Most Recent Posts

transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin
central and eastern Europe,unions,recognition Social dialogue in central and eastern EuropeMartin Myant
women soldiers,Ukraine Ukraine war: attitudes changing to women soldiersJennifer Mathers and Anna Kvit
military secrets,World Trade Organization,WTO,NATO,intellectual-property rights Military secrets and the World Trade OrganizationUgo Pagano
energy transition,Europe,wind and solar Europe’s energy transition starts to speed upDave Jones

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube