Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

After The European Elections – How Will The EU Leadership Respond?

by John Palmer on 27th May 2014

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
John Palmer

John Palmer

Following the dramatic results of the elections to the European Parliament, the focus now shifts to whether the European Institutions and governments are capable of effective response. They will need to react radically and rapidly even if the election post-mortem EU leaders’ summit in Brussels produces little except hand wringing.

It would be fatal if EU leaders were panicked into retreating from the first small step to a more democratic system of EU governance – the election of a Commission President. Any veto by EU governments of the candidate who now wins a European Parliament majority to become President of the Commission would send a message of utter cynicism to EU voters.

It is essential that the European Union does not temporise with the hard core racists who will be present in greater numbers in the European Parliament now. If anyone needs reminding of what the French National Front’s former leader Jean-Marie Le Pen has obliged us, addressing a rally in Marseilles Le Pen said that:

Maybe the Ebola virus will help the immigration problem by killing all the Africans.

But, above all the Brussels summiteers will need to begin dismantling the disastrous austerity economic straightjacket imposed after the Euro-area crisis by conservative governments and the conservative dominated European Commission, which has fuelled the revival of the long buried demons of the European far right.

Of course, in and by itself, a new economic strategy for sustainable growth, more jobs and a much fairer tax system will not eliminate the threat to the future of the European Union posed by the diverse right wing populists and beyond them the openly fascist and neo-Nazi parties who have made hay in this election. But it would help undermine the growing support of many poor and disillusioned people for the xenophobic and racist extremes.

This weekend marks the elections to the European Parliament (photo: CC Michal Sänger on Flickr)

The new European Parliament will include more right-wingers and neo-Nazis (photo: CC Michal Sänger on Flickr)

Changing Course after the European Elections

To change course, EU leaders must first understand that it would be political insanity to lump together the anti-European xenophobes on the populist and far right together with the growing support for parties on the radical left such as Syriza in Greece and similar parties in Spain, Italy, Germany and elsewhere. The leaders of Syriza – who may well emerge as the largest party after the next Greek general election – are opposed to leaving the EU or even abandoning the Euro.

They understand what price Greeks would have to pay for a disastrous devaluation coming on top of the terrible human tragedies created by the Euro-area austerity policies. Syriza also knows that it faces a massive political battle to mobilise support throughout the EU for an agreement to “forgive” an important part of the massive debt mountain which threatens to crush the fragile signs of Greek economic recovery. Little wonder that they are looking for allies throughout the EU.

The smaller parties of the radical left, even with their allies among the European Green parties will not be remotely strong enough by themselves to push through an end to EU/Euro-area austerity policies. But it will be surprising if we do not hear at least some of the same demands coming from the increasingly beleaguered governments in Dublin, Lisbon, Madrid and, above all, Paris and Rome.

The new Italian social democratic Prime Minister, Matteo Renzi, has dropped some very large hints that the EU will press for some easing of his country’s Euro-area’s deficit reduction targets. In Paris a drastically weakened, François Hollande, knows this is also essential if the feeble French growth rate is not to fizzle out completely.

Such overtures seem certain to attract support from Spain (where the “Indignados” movement has attracted significant support as have other radical leftist groups). The much weakened Fine Gael/Labour coalition government in Dublin, which lost heavily to Sinn Fein and an array of left leaning parties in the European elections, and the conservative government in Lisbon – where the elections were won by the socialists – are both also anxious for some change of policy in the Euro-area.

It would be a mistake to assume that the so-called “northern bloc” of hard line governments, who in the past have backed the German refusal to change course, will stay the course. In both the Netherlands and Finland there are alarming signs of an economic slowdown, and their governments may not be so resistant to a managed change of policy to growth and investment in Brussels in future.

What then of the Chancellor Merkel and her pro Euro-area “orthodoxy” government? There is certainly no enthusiasm to be seen to make a visible change of direction in policy which might eventually mean that Germany would have to accept a greater degree of resource transfers to the so-called Euro-area periphery. But Berlin knows that it may not be able to hold the line for much longer, especially if the future political survival of key allies in Paris and Rome is further put at risk.

The German EU ship of state will take some time to change direction. In the immediate future the responsibility for preventing fears of an aborted economic recovery leading to a disastrous new Euro-area crisis will fall to the European Central Bank. But to judge from remarks he has made in Portugal, its President, Mario Draghi seems likely to loosen monetary policy sooner rather than later.

It would be wrong to assume that even a major change of Euro-area economic policy will – in the short term – reverse the striking election gains made by the far right. But it would surely help to show voters, who have been profoundly alienated by the crisis, that there is a different way forward than to join a blinkered race into isolationism and xenophobia. The hard core racist, fascist and neo-Nazi groups which have reared their heads in some European countries will be more impervious to any change of policy. Dealing with the extreme right and their SA style paramilitary outriders will demand much more determined resistance from democrats of all kinds over a long period to ensure they are put back in the bottle.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ After The European Elections – How Will The EU Leadership Respond?

Filed Under: Politics

About John Palmer

John Palmer was formerly European editor of the Guardian and political director of the European Policy Centre in Brussels.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards