Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Getting to net zero: Europe’s investment challenge

Guillaume Kerlero de Rosbo and Nicolas Desquinabo 21st February 2024

Europe must invest heavily in its decarbonisation. Yet the expenditures are manageable and the alternatives unconscionable.

net zero,europe,investment,decarbonisation
With its huge cycling parks next to metro stations, plus wide cycle lanes, Copenhagen shows how public investment can green urban transport (Eugenio Marongiu / shutterstock.com)

All European Union member states have pledged to decarbonise their economies by 2050, aiming for net carbon neutrality. This ambitious goal requires ensuring that, by mid-century, Europe’s greenhouse-gas emissions do not exceed what its carbon sinks, such as forests, can absorb.

Given the EU’s historical responsibility, its contemporary emissions and its global influence—the second biggest regional market for most manufactured products—upholding this commitment is essential to secure a liveable future for the next generation. Yet some are challenging these climate commitments, arguing they are too expensive, punitive to economic actors, technically infeasible or overshadowed by urgent crises such as the conflict in Ukraine.

Achievable and affordable

These arguments are flawed, as evidenced by the report ‘Road to Net Zero’ from the Institut Rousseau. Presented to the European Parliament at the end of last month, the report charts a physically achievable and financially affordable path to decarbonisation, for the entire EU, by 2050. It was crafted with input from more than 150 researchers, engineers, economists and public-policy experts across Europe.

The good news is that, given adequate efforts, the EU-27 can slash emissions by 85 per cent within a generation, achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. Nor does this spell doom for the European economy—quite the opposite.

Three-quarters of the necessary funds (Figure 1) already exist and must be redirected—for instance, from diesel cars towards public transport and low-carbon vehicles. An additional €360 billion or so would be needed annually, 2.3 per cent of European gross domestic product. Europe spent twice that in 2022 on fossil-fuel imports which wreak havoc on our environment. It is not the transition that is costly but Europe’s collective failure to plan for the phase-out of fossil fuels.

Figure 1: total investments and additional investments (billions of euro) per year, compared with ‘business as usual’, required to achieve carbon neutrality in the EU-27 by 2050

net zero,europe,investment,decarbonisation

A report from the European Commission issued this month confirmed these global investment figures (€1,531 billion per year), though there are variations across sectors. The commission’s plan involves higher investments in road transport and energy, reflecting a lower ambition on reduction of fuel consumption. However, it lacks substantial provisions for agriculture and is less ambitious on building renovation, compared with the Institut Rousseau.

The added value of the institute’s plan also lies in isolating public investment within the total required. It proposes more than 70 public-policy measures, inspired by successful strategies in leading European regions—such as organic farming in central Italy, rail transport in Austria and cycling infrastructure in Denmark. Public expenditures must double, reaching €510 billion annually. Of the additional €360 billion needed yearly, compared with the status quo, €260 billion must come from the public purse.

This level of public investment is vital for two reasons. First, about 25 per cent of the required public investment is direct expenditure on public transport, renovation of public buildings and so on. The rest is needed to lever private investment by supporting various actors in the transition, unlocking essential private funds. This is crucial for the success of the European Green Deal and the challenge is well illustrated by the farmers’ legitimate discontent over falling incomes. European economic actors need not only financial support but also protection from unfair external competition.

Self-destructive limit

This work underscores the inseparable link between the transition and robust public support. Yet the current regulatory and fiscal framework severely limits states’ flexibility—which, if it does not change, will prove self-destructive.

For instance, regulations on ‘state aids’ significantly curtail public support by prohibiting, except in certain cases, any support for companies capable of distorting competition. The suspension of these regulations under the Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework, designed to aid EU member states to emerge from the pandemic and the shock of the war in Ukraine, should be made permanent. Nor is the European economy sufficiently shielded from external socially and environmental undercutting. The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) must be strengthened swiftly to protect Europe’s industry and free-trade agreements that significantly disadvantage its farmers should be revisited.

From a fiscal standpoint, the additional €260 billion in annual public investment, amounting to 1.6 per cent of current European GDP, clashes with the 3 per cent public-deficit ceiling in the Stability and Growth Pact, which would be sustained in the revised fiscal rules under negotiation. This contradicts a key objective of the current commission—realising the Green Deal.

Some may argue that allocating an additional €260 billion per year for EU-wide decarbonisation is excessive. Yet there are four compelling counter-arguments.

Entirely justified

First, these expenditures are entirely justified, compared with the costs of inaction. The business world already understands that climate change poses a significant threat to the economy, with the reinsurance company Swiss Re estimating a business-as-usual average annual GDP loss for Europe of 10.5 per cent by 2050—equivalent to the cost of a war.

Secondly, this investment pales by comparison (Figure 2) with the public expenditure committed to the European post-pandemic recovery plan (€338 billion per year) or current fossil-fuel subsidies (€359 billion per year, including energy price caps). Transitional investments thus merely reallocate existing public subsidies, which will diminish gradually as the economy decarbonises.

Figure 2: annual additional public investment in the EU for net zero by 2050, with various comparators (billions of euro)

net zero,europe,investment,decarbonisation

Thirdly, public expenditures will stimulate economic activity, generate millions of net local jobs, enhance European competitiveness and resilience amid global crises and bolster purchasing power in the short term. As Mariana Mazzucato points out, without public investment economies falter. After a decade of counterproductive austerity, Europe has missed the boat on new technologies—China has emerged as a leader in batteries, wind, solar and electric transport. While Europe talks about slowing its climate action, the US Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 has mobilised around $400 billion to support decarbonised industries. India has initiated Production-Linked Incentive schemes and China is subsidising its industries at various government levels, with fiscal and monetary levers.

Finally, this public investment will yield long-term savings and alleviate future pressure on public budgets. This will come through reductions in direct operational expenditures (energy consumption by public buildings, maintenance of rail and road infrastructure and so on), as well as in spending on unemployment insurance and adaptation to climate change.

More pronounced

All these benefits will be even more pronounced as local production is prioritised and consumption reduced.Electrification of energy without a simultaneous reduction in demand not only incurs higher costs, such as an additional €200 billion per year in alternative fuel imports in scenarios with less reduction of consumption. It also poses greater risks to energy sovereignty, due to resource constraints and challenges of industrial deployment.

The Road to Net Zero scenario is not tailored for blind ideologues who believe in solving climate challenges while cutting investments. It is a comprehensive transition plan crafted for pragmatic decision-makers and citizens seeking tangible action over empty rhetoric. Austerity, as seen tragically in Lebanon today, only leads to collapse. Failing to fund the ecological shift will ultimately prove far costlier. Each year of inaction escalates the bill. Conversely, every step toward sufficiency, rather than endless growth, and local production reduces it.

Embracing ecological transition is not just an environmental imperative. It is a strategically rational and economically advantageous choice for Europe. Will Europe rise to the occasion and meet the demands of history—or will it remain shackled by outdated dogmas?

This is included in our series on a progressive ‘manifesto’ for the 2024 European Parliament elections

Guillaume Kerlero de Rosbo
Guillaume Kerlero de Rosbo

Guillaume Kerlero de Rosbo is an independent expert in energy and ecological transition, having spent 15 years of strategic consulting on these issues. He directs studies around ecological issues within the Institut Rousseau and led the ‘Road to Net Zero’ study.

Nicolas Desquinabo
Nicolas Desquinabo

Nicolas Desquinabo is an independent expert in public-policy evaluation. He was formerly director of the masters in evaluation and monitoring of public policies at Sciences-Po Lyon.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834664e04a 8a1e 4ee0 a6f9 bbc30a79d0b1 2 Closing the Chasm: Central and Eastern Europe’s Continued Minimum Wage ClimbCarlos Vacas-Soriano and Christine Aumayr-Pintar
u421983467f bb39 37d5862ca0d5 0 Ending Britain’s “Brief Encounter” with BrexitStefan Stern
u421983485 2 The Future of American Soft PowerJoseph S. Nye
u4219834676d582029 038f 486a 8c2b fe32db91c9b0 2 Trump Can’t Kill the Boom: Why the US Economy Will Roar Despite HimNouriel Roubini
u42198346fb0de2b847 0 How the Billionaire Boom Is Fueling Inequality—and Threatening DemocracyFernanda Balata and Sebastian Mang

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

KU Leuven advertisement

The Politics of Unpaid Work

This new book published by Oxford University Press presents the findings of the multiannual ERC research project “Researching Precariousness Across the Paid/Unpaid Work Continuum”,
led by Valeria Pulignano (KU Leuven), which are very important for the prospects of a more equal Europe.

Unpaid labour is no longer limited to the home or volunteer work. It infiltrates paid jobs, eroding rights and deepening inequality. From freelancers’ extra hours to care workers’ unpaid duties, it sustains precarity and fuels inequity. This book exposes the hidden forces behind unpaid labour and calls for systemic change to confront this pressing issue.

DOWNLOAD HERE FOR FREE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641