Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

‘Building back better’: a promise fulfilled?

Lydia Korinek and Lukas Bertram 19th February 2024

Three years on, the lesson of the EU’s post-pandemic recovery fund is that building economic resilience is a long-term endeavour.

To soften the economic shock in early 2020 of the Covid-19 pandemic, governments around Europe engaged in negotiations over the design and size of stimulus packages. It was widely acknowledged that these mitigation efforts should not only aim for short-term recovery but also strive to make Europe’s economies more resilient in the long-term. Hence the name of the instrument agreed by the European Union—the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF).

On February 19th 2021 the €723 billion package of grants and loans came into force. Roughly half-way through its implementation, we can make a preliminary assessment of how much the facility has delivered on its promise, to ‘build back better’.

This shows positive signs: despite the unprecedented challenges faced by the EU since 2020, the overall economic resilience of member states has not been impaired. The RRF appears to have played a part in this stability. Moreover, those countries—such as Italy and Spain—which took the opportunity to develop comprehensive national plans for investment and reform, centred on the available money, have demonstrated remarkably swift implementation of those plans and progress towards their targets.

Challenges in the implementation of the RRF remain, including lack of flexibility to adapt to unforeseen circumstances. But the design of the facility has fostered a national ownership which was previously lacking and which is essential if member states are to stay the course for long-term goals.

Holistic understanding

In this turbulent era, more resilient economies have emerged as a key objective of economic policy-making. Global bodies such as the United Nations, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the EU have all encouraged economic resilience. We urgently need economies which are capable of weathering major socio-political disruptions and economic downturns while fostering long-term prosperity.

A holistic understanding of resilience transcends mere recovery: it encompasses the capacity of economies to absorb, recover from and adapt to shocks in ways that make future disruptions less likely. Economic resilience should thus not be understood as merely ‘bouncing back’ from crises but ‘bouncing forward’ towards a greener, more stable and prosperous economy. This holistic perspective envisages an economy that serves the wellbeing of current and future generations within the constraints of our planet’s resources.

To quantify and compare economic resilience, the ZOE Institute for Future-fit Economies developed an Economic Resilience Index. A ranking of EU economies for their resilience using the index’s methodology finds considerable disparities among member states: Sweden, Denmark and Finland lead, while Romania, Greece and Bulgaria lag behind. Because the EU can only be as resilient as its least resilient member state, this gap underscores the need for concerted efforts to bolster resilience across the region and particularly in the countries most exposed.

Resilience undiminished

New results from the Economic Resilience Index—presented in the charts below—reveal that the overall resilience of the bloc did not diminish from 2019 to 2022 and, indeed, countries which received more RRF funding per capita increased their resilience on average more than those receiving less. This is particularly significant given these countries’ past difficulties in drawing down EU funds: Spain, for example, was bottom of the table for absorbing European structural funds in 2014-20, when it made use of only 39 per cent of what was on offer, but at the mid-point of the RRF it has received more than half of its approved grants and is the country with the third highest disbursement.

building back better,recovery,resilience
building back better,recovery,resilience

At this point it thus seems that—in the face of the pandemic, Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the resulting energy crisis—the RRF has been contributing to economic resilience, as intended. This underlines the importance of access to funding for the least resilient member states to improve the EU’s collective performance.

More specifically, the quality of planned reforms and investments seems an important indicator of member states’ ability to enhance their resilience, alongside the amount of funding received. In particular, a higher degree of policy integration, especially in social and cohesion policies, correlates with improved resilience.

Looming fiscal cliff

With all this in mind, it is worrying that member states face a looming fiscal cliff in 2026 when the RRF runs out. Enhancing the future-preparedness of economies is a marathon, not a sprint, and without access to funds post-2026 there is a risk that the long-term positive effect of the RRF on resilience will be lost, beyond its short-term recovery role.

At the same time, revised EU fiscal rules soon to be reapplied will oblige member states to reduce high levels of public debt. This will require more prudent spending when the need for it remains high—not least to finance the European Green Deal.

A recent estimate puts the additional public investment needed only for the decarbonisation of EU economies at €260 billion per year, which is above what the RRF currently provides. Add to this the geopolitical uncertainties, including shifts in global trade partnerships with China and the United States and possible disruptions in international supply chains, and the need for investment is even more profound.

Follow-up instrument

The case for a follow-up instrument to help member states sustain momentum towards more resilient economies is compelling. Such a longer-term instrument would build on the successes of the RRF, extending its time horizon and upgrading its capabilities so it can better address evolving challenges.

The upgrade could include the integration of targets for social spending as well as a safeguard to ‘do no social harm’. Just as the RRF has incentivised green spending, setting benchmarks for social expenditure would help prioritise initiatives to foster social progress and cohesion—indispensable components of lasting economic resilience.

Beyond 2026 the EU needs to ensure that all member states, particularly those with limited fiscal capacity, have access to resources for vital reforms and investments for resilience-building, a common priority of the EU. Born out of crisis, the Recovery and Resilience Facility seems so far to be living up to its name and enabling countries not only to bounce back but to ‘build back better’. But there is still a long way to go and longer-term thinking is needed if the positive trends in economic resilience are to be maintained.

Lydia Korinek
Lydia Korinek

Lydia Korinek is a policy consultant at the ZOE Institute for Future-Fit Economies. She works mainly on fiscal policy and recovery. She studied international political economy, political science and socioeconomics.

Lukas Bertram
Lukas Bertram

Lukas Bertram is an economist at the ZOE Institute for Future-fit Economies. He works mainly on the economics of the green transition and the economic resilience of the EU. He studied economics with a focus on environmental economics.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983462 041df6feef0a 3 Universities Under Siege: A Global Reckoning for Higher EducationManuel Muñiz
u4219836ab582 af42 4743 a271 a4f423d1926d 0 How Trade Unions Can Champion Solidarity in Europe’s Migration DebateNeva Löw
u421983467298feb62884 0 The Weak Strongman: How Trump’s Presidency Emboldens America’s EnemiesTimothy Snyder
u4201 af20 c4807b0e1724 3 Ballots or Bans: How Should Democracies Respond to Extremists?Katharina Pistor
u421983c824 240f 477c bc69 697bf625cb93 1 Mind the Gap: Can Europe Afford Its Green and Digital Future?Viktor Skyrman

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity”,

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641