Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

How the banking lobby diluted EU regulation

Michael Peters 28th February 2023

EU institutions have taken a position weakening international standards and risking bank stability.

bank,EU,Basel III
Deutsche Bank, embroiled in ethical scandals in recent years, was assiduous in cultivating MEPs (Datenschutz-Stockfoto/shutterstock.com)

Earlier this month, the European Parliament adopted its official stance on the banking package. By the summer the European Union will have diluted the international Basel standards, making European banks less stable but locking in profits for their shareholders.

After the 2008 crash, there was a consensus that taxpayers should never again pay for bank bailouts. In Germany, such bailouts cost taxpayers €70 billion, in Ireland they cost €42 billion and a whopping €1.5 trillion was spent on them across the EU.

The diagnosis was that banks had been allowed to take on too much risk for speculative purposes, against an implicit ‘too big to fail’ government backup. The proposed solution was a requirement of higher equity ratios, to provide an internal buffer for losses in times of crisis.

While industrial companies generally operate with equity ratios of at least 20 to 30 per cent, the ratios for banks are often in low single digits. Before its collapse in 2008, only 0.08 per cent of the capital at the disposal of the German Hypo Real Estate Bank, for instance, comprised equity.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

New standards

For this reason, in 2010 the Basel Committee, the international body for banking regulation, agreed on new international standards. Although banks had just caused a massive global recession, they played an active part in those negotiations: 230 of 274 submissions came from industry groups.

Their biggest achievement was to uphold a system of ‘internal models’. This system allowed banks to report so called risk-weighted equity, which is not the kind of equity regular companies report. Since banks were doing the ‘risk weighing’ themselves, this allowed them to sustain lower actual equity ratios—and, as a result, higher profits.

Nonetheless, these ‘Basel III’ standards were an improvement on the status quo. The United States implemented the full requirements in 2014.

Heavily watered down

The EU, by contrast, partially implemented Basel III in 2013 and completion is only due this summer. Moreover, last November EU finance ministers adopted a heavily-watered-down proposal to do so; the European Parliament mostly supported the draft form of this this month.

The new version deviates strongly from Basel III as originally agreed. The final implementation should have increased existing capital requirements by an average of around 20 percentage points. Due to numerous exemptions in the internal models, the additional capital requirements have now shrunk to 4 per cent by 2030 (they will add up to 7 per cent by 2033).

In the event of losses, banks thus remain threatened by a higher probability of bankruptcy—still implying consequent bailouts worth billions of taxpayers’ money. In addition, certain measures are not to apply until 2032, 24 years after the financial crisis hit.

Massive pressure

The reason for this debacle is the massive pressure and resources of the European banking lobby. It did everything it could to weaken the proposed legislation. After all, the less equity banks have to hold, the higher their return on it—and so executive bonuses and shareholder dividends.

Finanzwende has analysed what the representatives of the financial industry have been doing in Brussels. We looked at the EU lobby register, as well as mandatory information provided by the authorities and parliamentarians involved.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Since the current president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, took office at the end of 2019, on Basel III representatives of the banking industry have met commission officials 176 times. These efforts have involved 70 financial groups and associations, employing around 300 lobbyists—with the French (Fédération bancaire française) and German (Bundesverband Deutscher Banken) banking associations ranking first and second for commission meetings. For comparison, civil-society representatives have only enjoyed two meetings with the commission on the topic during this time.

The lobbyists have been even more assiduous with the European Parliament: they met its rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs alone around 200 times on the banking bill, which includes implementation of Basel III. At the forefront were individual players such as Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank. Deutsche Bank even visited some of the lead MEPs several times. Experts from civil society, on the other hand, only had four meetings on Basel III with MEPs.

Heavily criticised

This is not a fair competition of arguments. The parliament and commission should not let the banking lobby draft laws for them.

Even the European Central Bank and the European Banking Authority have heavily criticised the commission’s diluted proposal. In an open letter in November 2022, the ECB vice-president, Luis de Guindos, its head of banking supervision, Andrea Enria, and José Manuel Campa, chair of the EBA, directly addressed the responsible commissioner, Mairead McGuinness.

They called for complete, rapid and consistent implementation of the Basel III framework in the EU. They even warned of risks to the reputation and competitiveness of the EU’s financial sector. Yet the parliament and the commission remain in favour of diluting the international standards.

For now, the lobbying has proved successful: what the industry is calling a ‘Basel III compromise’ is in fact a massive victory for the banks. The tightening of rules promised after the financial crisis has failed to materialise. To ensure that the banking lobby does not dictate laws for all of Europe again, it is crucial to support the civil-society actors—which, among other things, shed light on it.

Michael Peters
Michael Peters

Michael Peters is a fellow for financial markets at Finanzwende, interested in commercial banks, the shadow banking system and the European Central Bank.

You are here: Home / Economy / How the banking lobby diluted EU regulation

Most Popular Posts

meritocracy The myth of meritocracy and the populist threatLisa Pelling
consultants,consultancies,McKinsey Consultants and the crisis of capitalismMariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington
France,pension reform What’s driving the social crisis in FranceGuillaume Duval
earthquake,Turkey,Erdogan Turkey-Syria earthquake: scandal of being unpreparedDavid Rothery
European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani

Most Recent Posts

global south,Ukraine Winning in Ukraine, losing the global south?Werner Raza
imperial,Europe,Russia,Africa,Asia From imperial paternalism to genuine partnershipJérémy Lissouba
global south,Federal Reserve,debt,interest rates Where is the global south’s rescue brigade?Vera Songwe
corporate sustainability,gender,value chains Corporate sustainability needs a gender lensCarolina Rudnick Vizcarra, Sylvia Obregon Quiroz and Andriana Loredan
industrial policy,wellbeing,care Beyond industrial policyAnne-Marie Slaughter and Elizabeth Garlow

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

ETUI advertisement

The four transitions and the missing one

Europe is at a crossroads, painfully navigating four transitions (green, digital, economic and geopolitical) at once but missing the transformative and ambitious social transition it needs. In other words, if the EU is to withstand the storm, we do not have the luxury of abstaining from reflecting on its social foundations, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. It is against this background that the ETUI/ETUC publishes its annual flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe 2023, with the support of more than 70 graphs and a special contribution from two guest editors, Professors Kalypso Nikolaidïs and Albena Azmanova.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

#AskTheExpert webinar—Key ingredients for the future of work: job quality and gender equality

Eurofound’s head of information and communication, Mary McCaughey, its senior research manager, Agnès Parent-Thirion, and research manager, Jorge Cabrita, explore the findings from the recently published European Working Conditions Telephone Survey (EWCTS) in an #AskTheExpert webinar. This survey of more than 70,000 workers in 36 European countries provides a wide-ranging picture of job quality across countries, occupations, sectors and age groups and by gender in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. It confirms persistent gender segregation in sectors, occupations and workplaces, indicating that we are a long way from the goals of equal opportunities for women and men at work and equal access to key decision-making positions in the workplace.


WATCH HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Let’s end involuntary unemployment!

What is the best way to fight unemployment? We want to know your opinion, to understand better the potential of an EU-wide permanent programme for direct and guaranteed public-service employment.

In collaboration with Our Global Moment, Fondazione Pietro Nenni and other progressive organisations across Europe, we launched an EU-wide survey on the perception of unemployment and publicly funded jobs, exploring ways to bring innovation in public sector-led job creation.


TAKE THE SURVEY HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube