Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

If Biedroń is to help rebuild the Polish left, he has to be the opposite of Macron

by Gavin Rae on 13th December 2018

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

Gavin Rae

In any article published in the international press about Robert Biedroń, it seems almost obligatory to describe him as the new ‘Polish Macron’. Biedroń recently stood down as mayor of Słupsk to build a new national political party that will stand in next year’s European and parliamentary elections. He is a long-standing left-wing political activist, a former MP and one of the founders and leaders of the country’s LGBT movement. His image as a young and energetic challenger to the political status quo, and his pro-European political stance, have led to comparisons with French President Emmanuel Macron. However, Biedroń and the Polish left should take no inspiration from Macron but forge a different political path.

The Polish left suffered another severe defeat October’s local elections. Its two main parties, the Democratic Left Alliance and Razem, scored just 6.6 percent and 1.6 percent respectively. These elections were once again dominated by two parties from the right. The ruling Law and Justice Party (PiS) confirmed its position as the country’s dominant political party, although its vote was concentrated predominantly in the countryside and small towns. Meanwhile, the main opposition party, Citizens’ Platform (PO) (standing in these elections as Citizens’ Coalition), won support mainly in the large cities. Despite this dominance, independent candidates fared well in these elections, particularly in small- and medium-sized cities, showing the limits to the right’s dominance and the potential for the growth of a new united movement of the left.

The main organised political opposition to PiS is concentrated in Poland’s major cities and promotes a liberal alternative to the government. There has been huge pressure placed upon the left to assimilate itself into a united opposition movement, in order ostensibly to prevent the conservative and authoritarian PiS from winning a second term in office. Parts of the left have already been lured by such arguments, with the well-known centre-left politician Barbara Nowacka, and some of her supporters, joining PO’s electoral coalition during the local poll. However, PiS has managed to craft a political image as the party that protects the living standards of the poorer sections of society against a liberal elite. Meanwhile the liberal ‘centre’ is becoming ever more congested, with the banker and former leader of the party Modern, Ryszard Petru, launching a new political party named (without irony) Now.

Macron no thanks 

Opposition to the PiS government, amongst the liberal urban electorate, has reached its limits.

It is for this reason, and the failures of Macron whilst in power, that the Polish left should reject the strategy of trying to replicate his political movement. Macron’s political base is situated within the wealthiest sections of society. For example, during the first round of Presidential elections, he won 36 percent support among those earning more than €3,500 a month, yet only 12 percent of those with an income below €1,500. He also scored particularly well amongst managers and company directors but poorly among workers. PO and its satellite parties already monopolise such an electorate in Poland, which is attracted to their liberal economic programme.

In order to rebuild itself the Polish left has to look elsewhere for support, particularly within the small and medium cities, where both PiS and PO suffered significant losses. There are some signs that Biedroń is attempting to pursue such an alternative strategy. After the first round of local government elections he held up a map of Poland that showed how PiS were dominant in the poorer eastern regions of the country; and another displaying how the network of rail lines is much less developed in these areas. His message was clear: inequalities and under-investment have led to large sections of the electorate turning to PiS. He has also spent the past couple of months travelling around Poland and holding large political meetings in different regions. He is thus trying to reach out to an electorate that the ‘liberal opposition’ either ignores or has no access to.

What’s left?

Rejecting the path of Macron is not just about electoral strategy, but also touches the very heart of what it means to be left. Macron has introduced an economic programme of austerity and privatisation that has hit society’s poorest the hardest. He has instigated an upward redistribution of wealth, with the richest one percent of society capturing 44 percent of the tax breaks. These policies have resulted in a wave of social protests, organised against the economic policies of Macron and the French government. Concurrently, polls show that his approval rating has slumped in recent months, with less than 30 percent satisfied with the French President’s performance.  The neoliberal policies of Macron not only contradict the values of the left, but also erode the support of politicians who implement them.

Between PiS and Macron

The building of a pro-European progressive left in Poland faces a number of dilemmas. PiS is not primarily focused on taking Poland out of the EU (Polexit) but rather on attempting to transform it in a more rightward direction. Meanwhile, ‘pro-European’ politicians such as Macron look to create a more deregulated, neoliberal EU, which would be detrimental to the poorer member states to the east. This includes Macron’s push for a multi-speed European Union, which would likely force Poland to the side-lines of a more exclusive economic club.

The exact political character of Biedroń’s new political party, which is set to be formally launched in February, is unclear. So far his movement has no clear political identity, with both social democrats and liberals supporting and advising it. If, however, it is to be successful, he will have to endeavour to unite the disparate parts of the left and reach out to voters who are dissatisfied by the two right-wing parties that have monopolised Poland’s politics for nearly a decade and a half. Any successful left-wing force in Poland is going to have to offer an alternative to the right-wing nationalism of PiS and the neoliberalism of European politicians such as Macron.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ If Biedroń is to help rebuild the Polish left, he has to be the opposite of Macron

Filed Under: Politics

About Gavin Rae

Gavin Rae is a sociologist in Warsaw. He has written extensively on the political and social changes in Poland and central and eastern Europe, including Poland's Return to Capitalism: From the Socialist Bloc to the European Union and Public Capital: The Commodification of Poland's Welfare State.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards