Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Impartiality and public-service media

Robin Wilson 11th March 2023

The media storm in Britain around a television personality speaks volumes about why the United Kingdom has become a dysfunctional state.

media,impartiality,Lineker,BBC
Gary Lineker—not as he will be seen tonight (BBC)

It is difficult for outsiders to appreciate how significant it is that Gary Lineker, a former England footballer, will not be permitted to present tonight’s Match of the Day on BBC television, following comments by him on the British government’s xenophobia towards refugees.

To get a handle on this we need to call in aid the late Ulrich Beck’s concept of ‘risk society’. What Beck meant was that we now live in a world of ‘side-effects’, in which capitalism is constantly reacting unpredictably against itself, rather than just replacing tradition, throwing up unanticipated and unsettling phenomena—and leading some to react by retreating into ‘constructed certitudes’ drawn from the past.

One of those unanticipated phenomena was the ‘social media’ which have emerged in this century as a successor to the offline ‘public sphere’ Jürgen Habermas conceptualised in the last. Those Californian corporations include Twitter, on which Lineker has had a strong presence while being a longstanding anchorperson for the Match of the Day weekend reflection by the classic British public-service broadcaster on top-flight English football.

Lineker has become the centre of a media storm because of a Tweet he posted this week critical of the Conservative government’s proposed legislation—in recognised defiance of the United Nations Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights—to deport asylum-seekers fetching up from the English Channel, including to Rwanda, rather than permit them to make asylum claims and to address those on their individual merits, as those international obligations require. These asylum-seekers, mainly fleeing conflict-ravaged societies such as Iran, Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, are the flotsam and jetsam of Beck’s globalised ‘world at risk’, in which capitalism can no longer guarantee a stable, liveable existence but rather evokes all kinds of reactions, some fundamentalist, amid the insecurity it engenders.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

The intensity of the debate in Britain has been exacerbated by the argument that it has been Lineker’s Tweet, rather than the human dignity of asylum-seekers put at hazard by the government, which has been the source of headlines this week—not just in the corporate right-wing press but also on the part of the BBC itself. Emotions have been further dialled up by the recent revelation that the current chair of the board of the BBC, an institution whose reputation stands on its independence of government, assisted in brokering a loan to the last-but-one prime minister, Boris Johnson—who has a notoriously spendthrift lifestyle—while he was a candidate for the position.

‘Impartial’ reporting

At the heart of the argument has been the BBC’s critical commitment to ‘impartial’ reporting. Although coloured by Britain’s imperial history, unchallenged by any process akin to Germany’s Vergangenheitsbewältigung (dealing with the past), the service has because of its commitment to impartiality been able to sustain (despite the refusal of a hostile government to maintain its budget) a huge global audience. With English now the world’s lingua franca and United States media rendered less trustworthy because of the abolition under the presidency of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s of the ‘fairness doctrine’—enabling the ideologically driven Fox News established by Rupert Murdoch—the professional BBC has been of global significance in an unregulated ocean of ‘social media’ misinformation.

The problem is that, blinkered by Britain’s American-replicated first-past-the-post electoral system, the BBC has interpreted ‘impartiality’ as reflecting the adversarial institution of the House of Commons at Westminster: it should offer ‘balance’ between perspectives broadly reflecting the major contending parties. This not only means that it gives voice to fundamentalist political positions, however indefensible on the evidence, from ‘Brexit’ Euro-myths to climate-change denial, if these are espoused on one side of the Commons aisle. It also bends with the political wind, especially where—as on refugees—Labour is too cowed to offer any challenge to the dominant discourse (that the desperate journeys by raft across the channel, often ending in tragedy, are all got up by traffickers of the ‘migrants’), which the BBC then faithfully echoes.

Elite English football reflects in a concentrated fashion Beck’s ‘really existing cosmopolitanisation‘ of a globalised world on the move. The England (men’s) manager, Gareth Southgate, celebrates his squad’s ethnic diversity and distanced himself from the ‘racial undertones’ of the English-nationalist Brexit project. Both the men’s and women’s teams remain committed to ‘taking the knee’ before internationals to demonstrate their opposition to all forms of intolerance and the Premiership periodically follows suit before league games. This ‘woke’ behaviour stoked the ire of the xenophobes but now attracts genuine applause from supporters after initial reserve.

Lineker unwittingly turned the screw, unleashing the storm, by standing up for universal norms—the rule of law and human rights—which the far-right faction currently in control of the Conservative Party, as with the Republicans in the US, now ritually trashes as the frothings of ‘lefty lawyers’, to which they have recruited (however improbably) the mildly centrist Labour leader, Keir Starmer. Lineker raised so much ire because he compared this ruling faction’s populist rhetoric to that deployed in Nazi Germany. The legislation the government is seeking to push through could require it to join Russia (expelled last year) and Belarus outwith the Council of Europe—set up in 1949 to say ‘never again’ to Nazism and all that—whose 46 members are all required to be signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights, the organisation’s core instrument.

Professional journalism

Actually, the moral compass for professional journalism should be, empirically, the pursuit of objectivity and, ethically, commitment to these universal norms. By the first is meant the ability to recognise and correct self-critically one’s own prejudices to reflect the real world more truthfully. That means going beyond the lazy journalism of ‘he says, she says’ to probing under the surface and doing real research, so as—as the former Czech dissident turned president, Václav Havel, put it—to ‘speak truth to power’, rather than journalists being mere stenographers for the powerful.

The second, relatedly, requires however that journalists do not editorialise unless they do so in congruence with democracy, human rights and the rule of law and that those who have the specific responsibility of writing clearly-demarcated leaders or personal columns recognise that obligation as particularly binding. That does not in any way constrain their freedom of speech—but it does mean that the practice, widespread in Britain’s corporate press, of running inflammatory editorials on the front page masquerading as reportage has to be subject to democratic regulation.

Following the revelation of widespread invasion of privacy by the British press, especially in the empire controlled by Murdoch, the need for proper regulation of the media, to safeguard fair and accurate reporting while protecting freedom of expression, was finally recognised. But the pressure for action gradually dissipated and the right-wing press—so influential in bringing about the Brexit disaster it still refuses to recognise—remains unbowed, in a manner unlike anything else in western Europe outside of the Bild tabloid in Germany.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Behind all this, most fundamentally, is another British peculiarity among democracies—the absence of a written constitution which should set the framework for a deliberative public sphere. It was long assumed that this was unnecessary in the United Kingdom, on the grounds that ‘chaps’ who were members of the patrician, male ruling elite would appreciate and comply with its unwritten conventions.

Those lacunae have in recent years been ruthlessly exploited by ideologues and demagogues, such as Johnson—drawn from that very ruling caste while representing themselves on the contrary as the voice of the ‘common man’—determined to unshackle executive power from judicial constraint while promoting intolerance and quashing dissent. Until such times as that challenge is addressed, in a gyrating world at risk Britain will be one of the tops spinning most inchoately towards who knows where.

Pics
Robin Wilson

Robin Wilson is editor-in-chief of Social Europe, an adviser to the Council of Europe on intercultural integration and author of The Northern Ireland Experience of Conflict and Agreement: A Model for Export? (Manchester University Press) and Meeting the Challenge of Cultural Diversity in Europe: Moving Beyond the Crisis (Edward Elgar).

You are here: Home / Society / Impartiality and public-service media

Most Popular Posts

meritocracy The myth of meritocracy and the populist threatLisa Pelling
consultants,consultancies,McKinsey Consultants and the crisis of capitalismMariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington
France,pension reform What’s driving the social crisis in FranceGuillaume Duval
earthquake,Turkey,Erdogan Turkey-Syria earthquake: scandal of being unpreparedDavid Rothery
European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani

Most Recent Posts

global south,Ukraine Winning in Ukraine, losing the global south?Werner Raza
imperial,Europe,Russia,Africa,Asia From imperial paternalism to genuine partnershipJérémy Lissouba
global south,Federal Reserve,debt,interest rates Where is the global south’s rescue brigade?Vera Songwe
corporate sustainability,gender,value chains Corporate sustainability needs a gender lensCarolina Rudnick Vizcarra, Sylvia Obregon Quiroz and Andriana Loredan
industrial policy,wellbeing,care Beyond industrial policyAnne-Marie Slaughter and Elizabeth Garlow

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Eurofound advertisement

#AskTheExpert webinar—Key ingredients for the future of work: job quality and gender equality

Eurofound’s head of information and communication, Mary McCaughey, its senior research manager, Agnès Parent-Thirion, and research manager, Jorge Cabrita, explore the findings from the recently published European Working Conditions Telephone Survey (EWCTS) in an #AskTheExpert webinar. This survey of more than 70,000 workers in 36 European countries provides a wide-ranging picture of job quality across countries, occupations, sectors and age groups and by gender in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. It confirms persistent gender segregation in sectors, occupations and workplaces, indicating that we are a long way from the goals of equal opportunities for women and men at work and equal access to key decision-making positions in the workplace.


WATCH HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Let’s end involuntary unemployment!

What is the best way to fight unemployment? We want to know your opinion, to understand better the potential of an EU-wide permanent programme for direct and guaranteed public-service employment.

In collaboration with Our Global Moment, Fondazione Pietro Nenni and other progressive organisations across Europe, we launched an EU-wide survey on the perception of unemployment and publicly funded jobs, exploring ways to bring innovation in public sector-led job creation.


TAKE THE SURVEY HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The four transitions and the missing one

Europe is at a crossroads, painfully navigating four transitions (green, digital, economic and geopolitical) at once but missing the transformative and ambitious social transition it needs. In other words, if the EU is to withstand the storm, we do not have the luxury of abstaining from reflecting on its social foundations, of which intermittent democratic discontent is only one expression. It is against this background that the ETUI/ETUC publishes its annual flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe 2023, with the support of more than 70 graphs and a special contribution from two guest editors, Professors Kalypso Nikolaidïs and Albena Azmanova.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube