Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

It’s The Failure Of Modern Liberalism That Has Propelled UKIP’s Rise

David Goodhart 6th March 2015

David GoodhartUKIP’s recent success has triggered a cry of pain from liberal Britain. But responsibility for the rise of this modern populism lies substantially at the door of those self-same liberals.

To borrow from Tony Blair any sensible response that wants to be tough on UKIP must be tough on the causes of UKIP. And what is that cause? It is for the most part the excesses and blind spots of contemporary liberalism. The modern social and economic liberalism, that dominates all the main political parties, has produced an economically abandoned bottom third of the population with no real chance of ever gaining a share in prosperity; and an even larger group who feel a vague sense of loss in today’s atomized society in which the stability of family and the identity of place and nation has been eroded.

UKIP voters are a compound of those ignored, abandoned and laughed at by the metropolitan liberals who, despite some party differences, dominate our public and cultural life. UKIP certainly has a xenophobic fringe, and seems to have hoovered up most former BNP voters, but for the most part UKIP voters are just socially conservative, economically and culturally marginalized people who do not recognize themselves in any of the main parties. Many of the same factors seem to apply to PEGIDA in Germany; it is more of a single issue movement but that single issue is emblematic of the same alienation from high liberalism.

The gap that has opened up between the secular liberal baby boomer worldview that dominates our party, governmental and social institutions and the political and psychological intuitions of the ordinary citizen is the new cultural/class divide in Britain.

The liberal baby boomers tend to be universalistic, suspicious of most kinds of group or national attachment, and individualistic, committed to autonomy and self-realisation. They are often geographically and socially mobile and comfortable with rapid change. Such liberals might care about harm to people and about justice but, as the American social psychologist Jonathan Haidt has pointed out, they don’t “get” what most other people also get—loyalty, authority and the value of stability and continuity in communities.

Modern liberalism imposes the worldview, and economic interests, of the mobile, graduate, elite on the rest of society. And the rest of society often doesn’t like it, as the surge in support for populists like UKIP and PEGIDA makes clear. Why has so much time been spent in recent British politics on expanding and reforming higher education, and so little on sorting out our chaotic vocational training system—leaving us with an apartheid system between the graduates of good universities and the rest? Because it reflects the lives and interests of that baby boomer graduate elite, of which the political class is one part.

Why have we failed to build enough houses or sort out the welfare system? Because the interests of the liberal baby boomer elite are not sufficiently engaged.

And the biggest single slice of wrong-headedness concerns the security and identity issues—most of which boil down to the common sense notion of “fellow citizen favouritism”. This is not about race or hostility to “the other” it is about fairness, the belief that in general the interests of a British citizen, of whatever colour or creed, should come before a non-citizen.

But universalist, baby boomer liberalism in its embrace of large scale immigration, its enthusiasm for judge-made human rights law and for “non-discrimination” between EU citizens, ends up minimizing the distinction between national citizens and outsiders. Liberal rights based ideology has too little sense of the contribution that people need to make for societies to work.

This communitarian critique of liberalism is not illiberal but post liberal, it claims that people are moral particularists not universalists, and they care about the citizen/non-citizen distinction. That means agreeing that all humans are equal but not all equal to us; our obligations and allegiances ripple out from family and friends to stranger-fellow-citizens and only then to all humanity. Charity begins at home, even if it doesn’t end there. That’s why we spend 25 times more on the NHS than on development aid.

This critique also places great value on the social glue of national identity that modern liberalism takes for granted or disdains as a throw-back to ethnic exclusivity. But the glue is in fact a product of modern societies. It has been moulded over centuries, to create a sense of interconnection and mutual regard between citizen-strangers.

That sense of mutual regard now happily co-exists with racial and gender equality but it can also be damaged by over rapid change and ethnically segregated towns. And large Muslim minorities raise these issues particularly acutely as PEGIDA in Germany has highlighted.

A widely agreed, open national story, one of the most important aspects of social glue, is not some projection of the tribe onto modern societies but rather a valuable unifying asset in more diverse, individualistic societies. It is the erosion of national citizenship in the name of universal values that is reigniting racist “Golden Dawn” tribalism.

If modern liberalism is too disdainful about myths of lost intimacy, and too thoughtless about social glue, it is also wildly idealistic about choice and freedom.

Freedom does not already exist inside individuals ready to burst out once the constraints have been removed; it has to be nurtured within the bounds of human nature. This is what the 1960s revolution did not understand. Or rather the 1960s consisted of two movements closely entangled. There was the rights revolution for women and minorities that represented a leap forward in freedom and equality. But there was also a more “emancipatory” impulse to reject obligation and tradition that fuelled a surge in various social pathologies, from crime to the breakdown of the family that we are only now recognizing and recovering from.

Conventional liberalism does not like the idea of the common good because—in all but basic things like peace and physical security—it does not know how we can arrive at it in diverse, individualistic societies with many conflicting interests and ideas of the “good”.

Yet it often then smuggles in its own very clear view of the good society. As we have described, it has a bias towards universalism and individualism, it places a relatively low value on stability and continuity, indeed it is ambivalent about the idea of community which is something to be celebrated in the abstract but escaped from through geographical or social mobility in practice. The idea of the good life turns out to be something that looks very like the life of today’s metropolitan upper professional.

British elites have always been good at adapting to survive. But by bringing together the dissatisfied of Tunbridge Wells and the downtrodden of Merseyside, UKIP has presented the political class with a formidable challenge that cannot be met by a few policy wheezes. The rise of UKIP requires modern liberalism to better understand itself, and its limitations, and see itself through the eyes of those left behind by globalisation and those who cannot or do not want to forge a career in the professions or the creative industries.

Most people are rooted in communities and families—60 per cent of the population live within 20 miles of where they lived aged 14—often experience change as loss and have a hierarchy of moral obligations. Too often the language of modern politics ignores the real affinities of place and people. Those affinities are not obstacles to be overcome on the road to the good society; they are one of its foundations. People will always favour their own families and communities; it is the job of a post liberal politics to reconcile such feelings with fluid, open societies in which people expect high degrees of individual autonomy. Modern liberalism’s failure, to date, to achieve that reconciliation has left a large Nigel Farage-shaped hole in our politics.

Read also other contributions to the series on our “Understanding PEGIDA in context” focus page.

David Goodhart

David Goodhart is a British journalist, commentator, author and director of the "think tank" Demos. He is the founder and former editor of Prospect magazine.

You are here: Home / Politics / It’s The Failure Of Modern Liberalism That Has Propelled UKIP’s Rise

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube