Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Non-EU migrant workers—the ties that bind

Lilana Keith 20th September 2023

The European Union stands at a fork in the road when it comes to its treatment of external migrant workers.

Coming into the European Union to work is hard. Despite dramatic labour shortages across sectors and EU member states, work permits for non-EU workers are few—and those that exist often leave workers at the mercy of exploitative employers.

In theory, the single-permit directive of 2011 creates a simplified application procedure for work and residence permits and aims to promote equal and fair treatment of migrant workers. In reality, however, it does little to address widespread labour exploitation and other challenges migrant workers face. Indeed, recent research shows that these very EU rules may be contributing to such exploitation.

The directive is currently being renegotiated. So EU decision-makers have a critical opportunity to fill the holes in it.

Exploitation documented

New transnational research on the living and working conditions of non-EU migrant workers, led by Amy Weatherburn at the Université Libre de Bruxelles and supported by the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, documents exploitation under national arrangements for combined residence and work permits (the ‘single permit’). Workers interviewed in Belgium, Czech Republic and Spain reported wage theft, illicit wage deductions and long working hours, as well as discrimination at the workplace and in securing private accommodation.

In one case, a Brazilian dental assistant in Belgium had around €40,000 illegally deducted from their salary over three years by their employer, for taxes which the employer should have paid. In the Czech Republic, a Filipino massage therapist reported that their employer retained the income support provided by the government during the pandemic and had the gall to offer loans to meet basic needs—loans which would have had to be paid back, even though salaries were still owed.

The study shows how migrant workers are often made dependent on their employers by the application process and conditions of their permits. The short duration of the permit, complex procedures and reliance on employers for applications, renewals and information were key issues in all the countries studied.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



Unequal power relationships

Where the three countries differed—with different outcomes for workers—was over the possibility to change employer while utilising the same permit. In many EU member states, residence status is almost entirely dependent on a single employer and particular job. The single permit then ties the migrant worker to that job with that employer.

If a worker wants or needs to change their employer, they then have to apply for a new permit—a long and complicated process of uncertain outcome for the prospective employer as well as the worker. These arrangements cultivate unequal power relationships, dependency and exploitation and drag workers into irregularity.

Take Belgium. Some workers interviewed in the research endured exploitation and abuse, fearful otherwise of losing their right to work in the EU. In one case, a medical secretary from Madagascar did not report the harassment she endured by her employer, as she knew that it would affect the validity of her permit.

Difficult in practice

On the other hand, in Czechia, Spain and several other countries in the EU, workers are allowed to change employer on their single permit. Here the key considerations are the procedure to do so and how long the person can be unemployed and looking for alternative work—changing employer may still be very difficult in practice.

For example, in the Czech Republic, the notification procedure is complicated, workers can only be unemployed for up to 60 days and they must be with an employer for at least six months before making a change. Some research participants were able to change employer but for others it was not possible or they considered the experience too harrowing to embark upon.

Other countries where there is some form of notification procedure or need to get consent from the authorities to change employer, and constraint to stay within the same profession or category of work, include Estonia, Germany, Italy, Lithuania and Luxembourg. By contrast, several countries, including Spain, Portugal, Greece and Finland, only require fulfillment of the usual registrations and procedures related to employment and social security.

In Spain, for instance, permits are issued to workers on the basis of a job offer or contract but the permit is not tied to any particular employer. Workers have to show a minimum level of employment or income when they renew it. The research found some dependence on employers remained but, overall and comparatively, the system enabled labour-market mobility.

Setting standards

Some of the aspects of the application procedure and design of single permits, linked to dependency and exploitation, are under discussion vis-à-vis the reform of the directive. In particular, the procedure for workers to change their employer is on the table.

It is crucial that the revised directive sets standards so that, across the EU, individuals can easily change their employer and type of work on their existing permit, with minimal bureaucracy. If it is necessary to notify the authorities, the procedure must be reasonable, simple and clear—it should not be a barrier to anyone changing their job in practice.

Migrant workers also have to be provided with enough time realistically to get another job— to find out about the rules, go through all the steps of recruitment, be offered a job and fulfil whatever administrative requirements follow. Experience shows that three months is vastly insufficient for this.

Other key measures to reduce misinformation and exploitation by unscrupulous employers include establishing direct communication with workers about their applications if their prospective employer is the lead applicant. Permit holders should also be systematically informed about their rights and relevant rules, procedures and support organisations.

Governments should ensure too that workers are not penalised if their employer mistreats them, by providing a transitional permit of 12 months to a worker whose employer violates their rights or ensuring permits are extended to be valid for a similar period. During this time, workers should have full access to the labour market. Such a permit already exists in Finland, for example.

The revision of the single-permit directive represents a fork in the road for EU decision-makers. They can choose to normalise in EU law policies which have been found, time and again, to give an unfair advantage to unscrupulous employers. Or they can break that chain of dependency: they can establish minimum standards across the EU, fair to migrant workers and good employers, which enable workers to change job on their existing permit.

A longer version of this article was published in Boletín Impulso—Espacio por Derechos, a magazine edited by Fundación Cepaim. The background research was also supported by CNCD-11.11.11 and the Confederation of Christian Trade Unions in Belgium, the Association for Integration and Migration-SIMI in the Czech Republic and Fundación Cepaim in Spain.

Lilana Keith
Lilana Keith

Lilana Keith is senior advocacy officer on labour rights and labour migration at the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, a network of more than 165 organisations in 35 countries.  She previously led PICUM’s work on undocumented children, young people and families.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834676 bcba 6b2b3e733ce2 1 The End of an Era: What’s Next After Globalisation?Apostolos Thomadakis
u4219834674a bf1a 0f45ab446295 0 Germany’s Subcontracting Ban in the Meat IndustryŞerife Erol, Anneliese Kärcher, Thorsten Schulten and Manfred Walser
u4219834dafae1dc3 2 EU’s New Fiscal Rules: Balancing Budgets with Green and Digital AmbitionsPhilipp Heimberger
u42198346d1f0048 1 The Dangerous Metaphor of Unemployment “Scarring”Tom Boland and Ray Griffin
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp