Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Fostering public research or boosting Big Tech?

Philip Freeman and Jan Willem Goudriaan 21st September 2023

The European Health Data Space should serve patients and healthcare workers, not private profit.

European Health Data Space,EHDS,Big Tech
Securely anonymised personal data can be a boon for public medical research (Gorodenkoff/shutterstock.com)

Data can be used for dangerous as well as beneficial ends. Nowhere is this more stark than in healthcare.

On the one hand, legitimate uses of data can push forward medical research, improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on health and care workers. On the other, individuals’ health data are the most sensitive, with a vast array of possible misuses. These include identification of those susceptible to addiction, to target advertisements for tobacco or alcohol products. Refinement of health-reimbursement systems, such as via diagnosis-related groups, has meanwhile facilitated the commercialisation and privatisation of public healthcare.

The draft European Health Data Space (EHDS), proposed by the European Commission in May last year, stands at a crossroads between these two visions of data use. The choice is between a space that protects patients’ privacy, supports healthcare workers and defends Europeans’ right to healthcare—as laid down in article 35 of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights—and one that commercialises citizens’ personal data, destroys medical confidentiality and overburdens health professionals, all in the name of private profit.

Members of the European Parliament must ensure they support the right version of the EHDS when it eventually comes to plenary. And whereas the commission’s proposal has as its legal basis articles 16 (data protection) and 114 (approximation of laws) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, MEPs must also include article 168 (promotion of a high level of health) to anchor the commitment to improving public healthcare systems in Europe.

Ulterior motives

So far, the commission’s actions have betrayed little interest in a public-good version of the EHDS. This was evident as early as the impact assessment, in which it fraudulently gave the impression that trade unions were supportive of the proposal—the four ‘unions’ in favour turned out to be business and trade organisations. The commission has still not corrected the assessment nor apologised.

Other aspects of the proposal suggest ulterior motives. Article 8, which aims to ‘open up’ the telemedicine market, is totally beyond the purported scope of the EHDS and raises concerns that it could be a Trojan horse for further marketisation and privatisation of healthcare.

Moreover, the unrestricted access to data for secondary uses, even for technology companies with little or no connection to health and care, risks turning the EHDS into ‘patient zero’ for Big Tech expansionism into future European data spaces. Health-policy, law and ethics experts recently warned of disastrous consequences for the public sector, such as Big Tech dominance in ‘research agenda setting and growing dependencies on privately owned computational infrastructures for the provision of public goods, such as health’.

The co-legislators must therefore scale back the commission’s proposal and concentrate on the core aspects of the EHDS—the facilitation of cross-border sharing of personal health data between professionals to improve provision and the secondary use of anonymised data for clearly defined public-interest research. There are three aspects to consider.

Involving workers

First, healthcare workers must be involved in the implementation and governance of the EHDS. Hundreds of thousands—from doctors to nurses to administrative staff—will be involved ‘on the ground’. They are able, through their unions and other representative organisations, to provide insights, denied to the lobbyists for big tech, into how this going to function.

Healthcare professionals will also be massively affected by the EHDS. Medical practices, administrative systems and so on will have to change to meet the new obligations, which are however not likely to be associated with adequate investment in training and new staff. The commission has promised a mere €220 million over four years to assist implementation. The rest will be down to national governments, which have shown little appetite to invest in healthcare, even after the pandemic.

The EHDS therefore needs to ensure that healthcare workers, along with other key stakeholders such as patients, are given a clear and influential role within its governance structures. Unions and professional associations must be involved in the national digital-health authorities, so that the transition does not affect staff negatively. The European Health Data Board must also give a voice to these stakeholders, to enhance transparency and accountability.

Fundamental rights

The second key element is trust. Many patient groups and digital-rights organisations are rightly concerned about the potential impact of the EHDS on fundamental rights such as privacy. A report from the Netherlands shows hospitals already struggle to ensure the confidentiality of patient data, due to unbalanced contracts with large medical-device manufacturers. Excessive scope for secondary uses of personal data, capture by for-profit actors and lack of a mechanism for individuals to permit or deny access are just some of the concerns.

Unfortunately, these concerns are not shared by everyone. In June, a group of research associations and trade bodies published a statement in which they declared: ‘Any form of opt-in or opt-out mechanism [for sharing health data] would introduce the real risk that data bias will form part of the EHDS from its inception and thus undermine its principal value for secondary use research purposes.’

It is inconceivable that European citizens would not be given the opportunity to object to their health data being used for secondary purposes. This would not only be in violation of their right to privacy but also would destroy doctor-patient confidentiality. The real risk to the value of the EHDS for secondary research would be that patients and healthcare workers did not trust it to enshrine their rights.

The vast majority of people are willing to share personal health data for transparent, public-interest research, as a poll commissioned by the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament shows. They are however less confident about vaguely defined ‘innovation’.

Think of organ donations: whatever the consent system in place, donors are certain that their organs will be used to save another person’s life—not given to a for-profit company to do what it wants with them. The EHDS must give data donors the same assurances, by restricting the scope of acceptable secondary uses to medical research and development and ensuring that only actors with a clear and proven link to the sector can make use of the data.

Public ownership

The final requirement is a focus on public ownership. The choice is not ‘progress’ controlled by Big Tech or Luddism: technology can be used to drive forward socially accountable innovation in the public interest. The EHDS can be a vital tool in improving our healthcare systems only if public ownership and control is built into its architecture. The common infrastructures and the digital-health platform must have an open-source licence, with the code available in the open-source code repository of the EU.

What must be avoided is a private company being given the contract to build and maintain the technical systems—it would then own the code and effectively could never lose the contract. Furthermore, the regulation must ensure that there is a public return on public investments.

The EHDS proposal would force public healthcare systems to make the data they hold, which obviously cost money to collect, store and transmit, available free for secondary uses. A public hospital might thus find itself forced to pay market prices for a new medicine or product it helped develop. There must be profit-sharing between the data holders and those using the data for secondary purposes.

More widely, the overwhelming dominance of Amazon and Microsoft in cloud services means a vast array of sensitive data—even military secrets—must be stored on their servers. This dependence on third-country, private companies raises huge risks of the cartelisation of data storage and denial of accountability for a key strategic infrastructure. Although the commission’s European strategy for data recognises this problem somewhat, neither it nor EU member states’ joint declaration on cloud computing reaches the logical conclusion of greater public ownership of the cloud.

No silver bullet

The EHDS has the potential to be truly transformative for European healthcare, by facilitating public-interest research, reducing the administrative burden on healthcare workers and improving patients’ outcomes. To reach this potential it must however focus purely on these aspects. Privacy and patient trust, with healthcare workers as key collaborators, must be seen as enablers of ethical research, not barriers to it.

Finally, although the EHDS (and digitalisation more broadly) can bring benefits in health, it is no silver bullet for the problems plaguing the sector: understaffing, low pay and underinvestment. A person-centred data space respecting fundamental rights must therefore be coupled with greater investment in public healthcare systems.

Phil Freeman
Philip Freeman

Philip Freeman is pursuing a research traineeship with the European Trade Union Institute.

Jan Willem Goudriaan
Jan Willem Goudriaan

Jan Willem Goudriaan has been general secretary of the European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) since 2014.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983462 041df6feef0a 3 Universities Under Siege: A Global Reckoning for Higher EducationManuel Muñiz
u4219836ab582 af42 4743 a271 a4f423d1926d 0 How Trade Unions Can Champion Solidarity in Europe’s Migration DebateNeva Löw
u421983467298feb62884 0 The Weak Strongman: How Trump’s Presidency Emboldens America’s EnemiesTimothy Snyder
u4201 af20 c4807b0e1724 3 Ballots or Bans: How Should Democracies Respond to Extremists?Katharina Pistor
u421983c824 240f 477c bc69 697bf625cb93 1 Mind the Gap: Can Europe Afford Its Green and Digital Future?Viktor Skyrman

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity”,

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641