Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

The Three Policy Changes Europe Needs

by Engelbert Stockhammer on 25th July 2014

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Engelbert Stockhammer, Policy Changes

Engelbert Stockhammer

The European economy is still in crisis. Real incomes in the Euro area are below the level of 2008 and unemployment is in the double digits in the southern European countries. While the crisis has originated in the USA, it is Europe that has fared worse. The European economic policy regime and European institutions, far from shielding the European population from the storms unleashed by a financial system gone wild, have contributed to a deepening of the crisis.

The mix of constrained national fiscal policy on the one hand and liberalised finance and European monetary policy on the other hand has proven counterproductive. Worse, the austerity policies imposed by the Troika have trapped those countries that have suffered most in the crisis in a state of depression. These reforms and high unemployment undermine the legitimacy of the EU and ultimately its political stability. To gain the trust of its citizens, Europe will have to radically change its economic policy. I will outline three elements of the necessary changes.

Rejuvenate Fiscal Policy: Deficits In The Recession Countries And Taxes For The Rich

The crisis has demonstrated that fiscal policy can be an effective tool to stabilise collapsing output and to create jobs. Government multipliers are higher in recessions than in periods of solid growth (see here and here). To make use of this, countries in recession have to be able to run budget deficits in the first place. But that is not what the EU has done. Rather it has tried to circumscribe the room of national governments, while the European budget is too small to make a difference. National governments are to have constitutional debt brakes, but a European stimulus package worthy of that name has never materialised.

Markets have proven to be unreliable means of guiding production decisions. Investment is needed in areas such as green technologies, housing, child care and education. In a recession much of that should be deficit-financed to stimulate demand, but there are also areas where taxation should be increased to guarantee a fair system. Multinational corporations presently avoid taxation by transferring profits to tax havens, many of them within the EU, like Luxembourg and Ireland. The super-rich park their wealth offshore to avoid paying their legal share. Like the financial transactions tax, these are all areas where a European initiative would be welcome.

Policy Changes

Senator Kennedy used to campaign for higher wages in the US. And also the European economy would benefit from higher wages. (photo: CC SEIU on Flickr)

A Monetary Policy That Supports Job Creation

The Euro crisis does have its root in part in the separation of fiscal policy, which takes place at the national levels, and the monetary policy, which is now conducted at the European level. Central banks are lenders of last resort – both for the private (banking) sector and for the public sector. The ECB, however, is trying to only serve the banking sector. It should also step in to support public debt of the member states. As Europe is dealing with a debt overhang in many countries. The low inflation target of the ECB is counterproductive. If inflation rates stay low, the real debt burden (both for households and for governments) will be more difficult to deal with.

Wage Policy: Creating A Floor For Wages

European integration has in the past aimed at creating a competitive economy. But the wealth created has not trickled down. Globalisation, financialisation and welfare state retrenchment have put a downward pressure on wages. Indeed wage growth has stalled in many countries already before the crisis, and real wages have been falling since. Europe has contributed to this by creating a setting that invites countries to compete by means of wage restraint, thus encouraging a race to the bottom for wages in a futile quest for competitiveness. If all countries pursue this strategy of wage restraint, who is going to buy what has been so competitively produced? Consumption propensities out of wages are higher than those out of profits; wages are the main source of consumption demand and the European economy overall is wage-led.

Wage restraint can create export-led growth in some countries for some time, but not in all countries all the time. The neoliberal growth model relies either on increasing debt to fuel consumption. Or it creates a model that relies on export surpluses, which results in international imbalances. The conditions of the Troika in those countries hit worst by the crisis have furthered these developments. The Troika has asked for what is euphemistically called ‘internal devaluation’, which means reduction in minimum wages, weakening of labour law and an undermining of collective bargaining. A system of national minimum wages, say at two thirds of the national median wage, could create a useful wage floor and collective bargaining should be strengthened rather than weakened.

European has to get serious about a European social model or it will disintegrate.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Economy ・ The Three Policy Changes Europe Needs

Filed Under: Economy

About Engelbert Stockhammer

Engelbert Stockhammer is Professor of Economics at Kingston University in London.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards