Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Portugal: socialist victory and the morning after

Pedro Magalhães 31st January 2022

Why did the socialists win so big in Portugal? Maybe because they weren’t expected to.

Portuguese election,election Portugal,Chega,PSD,Socialist Party,PS
Wind behind him—the socialist leader and outgoing prime minister, António Costa (studio f22 ricardo rocha / shutterstock.com)

There are typically two questions foreign correspondents ask Portuguese political scientists on the eve of elections. Why doesn’t Portugal have a significant populist radical right-wing political party? And why has the Socialist Party (PS) survived unscathed the erosion suffered by social-democratic parties nearly everywhere else in Europe?

After Sunday’s election, the first question has lost its point. Chega (‘Enough’) increased its support from 1.3 to 7.2 per cent of the vote and from one to 12 MPs, becoming the third-largest force in parliament after the centre-left PS and the centre-right PSD. Founded in 2019 by a former PSD militant, André Ventura, Chega had already given a clear sign of its potential strength in last year’s presidential election, when its leader won close to 12 per cent.

The social ‘demand’ for such a party has been strong in Portugal for some time. Surveys capturing ‘populist attitudes’—the belief in the existence of a deep division between ‘elites’ and ‘people’ conceived as homogeneous entities, with the former perceived as fundamentally corrupt—have found these to be quite prevalent in Portugal, even in comparison with countries where parties catering to that demand have been established for some time.

Moreover, Chega has managed to attract those voters while partially evading the stigma attached to ‘old’ extreme-right parties, perhaps due to its emergence as a splinter from the PSD rather than a direct offshoot of extremist organisations. Instead, Chega and his leader have themselves profited from the stigmas attached not only to the political class but also to the Roma population, against whom prejudice in Portugal is quite pervasive. Ventura did exceptionally well in 2021 in municipalities where Roma minorities are larger, as well as in contexts where—linked to the size of the Roma population—the share of recipients of social assistance is higher, suggesting the party’s message about ‘welfare dependency’ had at least one target its voters identified.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Ventura’s previous visibility as a football commentator on television and the irresistible attraction for the Portuguese media of the ‘bombastic’ did the rest. Post-electoral surveys will tell us more about current Chega supporters but what we know does not speak of a party disproportionally supported by the economically deprived or by the working class more generally: cultural, rather than economic drivers, seem to have been most consequential.

Unexpected success

In contrast, the second question—about the continued success of the Socialist Party—still needs answers. On Sunday, the socialists won close to 42 per cent of the vote, five points up on 2019. This was rather unexpected.

Over the last two months, the gap between the PS and the PSD had continuously narrowed in the polls, to the point of a technical tie just a week before the election. On election night, however, the socialists increased their advantage over the PSD from nine to more than 12 percentage points and obtained an absolute majority in parliament, only the second ever in their history. If it completes its term, a socialist government will have governed the country for about two-thirds of the time during this century.

As always, there are potential short-term and long-term explanations for this outcome. The short-term ones will lead to considerable soul-searching. Was the perceived competitiveness of the election as portrayed by the polls until the preceding week genuine or was it manufactured by potentially faulty methods and/or their amplification by the media? We may never know for sure.

But the foreseeable consequences of that perceived closeness have come to fruition. First, there was increased mobilisation: in a country where turnout had experienced a secular decline, bringing it below the European average, the 2022 elections brought an upswing, the first since 2005—when perhaps not by chance the socialists obtained their previous absolute majority.

Secondly, there was strategic voting: since 2002, on average close to one in five voters have made their choice in the week before the election and this time the late deciders may have swayed considerably towards the PS, to prevent a right-wing victory. Predictably, this hurt the two main parties to its left: the Left Bloc (which dropped from 9.7 per cent in 2019 to 4.5 per cent this time) and the Communist Party (from 6.5 per cent to 4.4 per cent). Again, only post-election studies will be able to confirm this.

Portugal semi-detached

The structural and long-term explanations are perhaps of greater interest. In many European countries, social-democratic parties have experienced dramatic erosion over the last two decades, fostered by the reduction of their core industrial working-class constituency, the rise of an educated middle class and the increased salience of a libertarian-authoritarian axis of political conflict. As Herbert Kitschelt presciently sketched in his 1994 classic, The Transformation of European Social Democracy, this has created complex dilemmas for social-democratic parties about where to position themselves, as well as opportunities for green, new-left and radical-right parties.

Portugal, however, remains semi-detached from this world. Production workers still constitute a disproportionate share of the electorate, even by already-high southern-European standards. Only about 55 per cent of Portugal’s workforce has completed at least secondary education, the lowest level among 31 European countries investigated. The socio-economic dimension of political competition—redistribution and the role of the state—remains the most salient, something that the Great Recession, the eurozone crisis, the bailout of 2011-13 and the associated austerity policies may even have reinforced.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

The most significant dilemmas have instead been experienced on the right of the party system. During the prior period of the centre right in government (2011-15), the more neoliberal leadership of Pedro Passos Coelho and the austerity measures imposed by the ‘troika’ (the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank and the European Commission) seem to have led voters increasingly to perceive the PSD as too far to the right. The party lost some of its ability to attract older, less educated and poorer voters.

Coelho’s successor, Rui Rio, therefore, spent the last few years attempting to reposition the PSD as moderate and centrist, even ‘social-democratic’ (its official name reflects the climate at the time of its formation in the wake of the 1974 revolution). On the face of it, this seemed wise. As genuine dilemmas usually play out, however, this was almost permanently contested within the party by its more neoliberal wing, while creating external opportunities for competition to the right.

The new Iniciativa Liberal party increased its presence in parliament in these elections from one to eight MPs, on a platform of lower taxes and less state intervention. This, together with the rise of Chega, has resulted in a fragmented right—hence the PSD’s inability to advance electorally in 2022.

Squaring the circle

The future holds other sorts of dilemmas, but this time for the socialists in government (or any other incumbent in the near future). Portugal remains a country with comparatively high inequality in income and (especially) wealth, still reeling from the—highly socially asymmetric—consequences of the pandemic. Its labour force lags in qualifications, productivity is 25 per cent below the EU-27 average (and receding further) and investment in education, research and development and childcare and early education have been stagnant, at best, for at least a decade.

Whether a socialist government burdened by debt (more than 130 per cent of gross domestic product) and low fiscal capacity will be able to square the circle of catering to the immediate social needs of its electoral constituency and, at the same time, invest in the future remains unclear at best, unlikely at worst.

Pedro C. Magalhães
Pedro Magalhães

Pedro C Magalhães is a political scientist and a research fellow at the Institute of Social Sciences of the University of Lisbon.

You are here: Home / Politics / Portugal: socialist victory and the morning after

Most Popular Posts

Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic

Most Recent Posts

transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin
central and eastern Europe,unions,recognition Social dialogue in central and eastern EuropeMartin Myant
women soldiers,Ukraine Ukraine war: attitudes changing to women soldiersJennifer Mathers and Anna Kvit
military secrets,World Trade Organization,WTO,NATO,intellectual-property rights Military secrets and the World Trade OrganizationUgo Pagano
energy transition,Europe,wind and solar Europe’s energy transition starts to speed upDave Jones

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube