Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Public procurement: ending the race to the bottom on workers’ conditions

Oliver Roethig 28th April 2021

On International Workers’ Memorial Day, it’s worth remembering that when workers don’t have a say they may lose more than their voice.

public procurement,International Workers' Memorial Day
Oliver Roethig

The essence of democracy is not just the freedom to speak—it is the freedom to have a say.

That is why unions across Europe are today launching a campaign to call for a simple but profound change to public-procurement legislation in the European Union, which would guarantee that working people have a say. We are calling for public contracts to be awarded only to companies that have collective-bargaining agreements with their workers.

Increasingly, corporations operating in Europe are deciding to suppress workers’ say at work. By doing so, our fresh research shows, they have removed collective-bargaining coverage for over 8 per cent of service-sector workers since 2010.

This has a cost, both to workers and society. Within the services sector, we show that workers excluded from collective-bargaining agreements in the EU are missing out on €25 billion per year in lost wages, while public revenue is down by €28 billion per year in lost tax and social-security contributions.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Determining role

Public procurement amounts to €2 trillion per year in the EU, 14 per cent of gross domestic product. This money, spent by governments and public institutions for services delivered by private contractors, can play a determining role in setting standards across whole sectors.

Currently, however, it is often allowed to fuel the race to the bottom. That is because the EU’s public-procurement rules are skewed to favour price above all other considerations. Under these circumstances, corporations consistently turn to undercutting working conditions, by suppressing their workers’ fundamental collective-bargaining rights.

Today is International Workers’ Memorial Day, a day of mourning for the workers’ movement. Remembering those who have lost their lives at work takes on an added, bitter perspective when we consider what could have been and how close it was.

We think of the care workers, cleaners, call-centre workers, logistics and postal workers, security guards and all the essential workers who have lost their lives. Had they had more of a say, protective equipment, safe staffing and paid sick leave for self-isolation would have been more of a priority and lives would have been saved.

Across Europe, these very workers have been raising their voices. In Italy, security and cleaning workers went on a national strike as employers yet again refused after eight years to renew the collective agreement in their sector . It’s a similar tale, of the suppression of collective bargaining, for hospital cleaners in Spain, tech workers in Finland, nursing-home workers in Poland and many, many more.

The situation is symptomatic of a deeper crisis—the crisis in workplace democracy. We know that when working people have a say they use it to protect themselves, their families and the communities in which they live and work. Rather than incentivising companies not to listen to their workers, public money must be used to ensure these workers’ demands are taken into account.

Low-paid and precarious

Workers in sectors in which public procurement accounts for large market shares—such as cleaning and security, but also call-centre work among others—are often low-paid and precarious. While this is a testament to the negative role public contracts have played, it also presents an opportunity.

Ensuring that public contracts only go to companies that have collective-bargaining agreements with their workers would set a floor of minimum decency for workers. One clear marker of this is pay: workers covered by collective bargaining—across the EU and all sectors—are paid on average 10 per cent more than workers who are not. Quite simply, when workers have a say, they can claim back an ever-fairer share of the wealth they are so essential to creating.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

What’s more, it’s a win-win-win. As well as lifting conditions for workers, it would reward those companies who already have collective-bargaining agreements with their workers. For governments, it would bring in more social-security and tax revenue. In a time when reinvigorating the economy and shoring up public budgets is top of the agenda, expanding collective bargaining has to be a key part of the solution.

Pressure mounting

The good news is that broad pressure is mounting behind our demand. The European Parliament has adopted a report in which it recommends that the EU make public procurement conditional on collective bargaining. Now the Council of the EU and the European Commission need to be won over.

This is a simple change—a low-hanging fruit within grasp. It only requires political will. Given that companies that apply for public contracts also provide services in the private sector, it would have implications well beyond the 14 per cent of GDP directly invested through public procurement.

It is time to lay the foundations for a post-pandemic ‘new normal’, based on decent work. For service-sector unions, this is a core demand—we will not stop until it is met.

Pics 2
Oliver Roethig

Oliver Roethig heads UNI Europa, the European service workers’ union.

You are here: Home / Economy / Public procurement: ending the race to the bottom on workers’ conditions

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube