Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

The Shadow of Unfreedom: A New Authoritarianism Grips the Globe

Robert Misik 5th May 2025

A harsh, right-wing authoritarianism is rising, casting a shadow of unfreedom as classic conservatism fades.

u4219834676a 7553782910b2 3

Across the globe, a stringent, right-wing authoritarianism is gaining momentum, threatening to eclipse traditional conservatism with a new “iron curtain” of unfreedom. This emergent ideology, variously analysed as “legal authoritarianism,” a novel form of “fascism,” or even authoritarian libertarianism, fundamentally represents what can only be described as a “crazy right.”

This movement thrives on the amplification of societal problems to the point of absurdity. Nations are portrayed as being on the brink of collapse, while “wokism,” often a marginal influence on daily life, is inflated into a phantom of left-wing totalitarianism. Migration is depicted as an “invasion” by destructive hordes, and normal, liveable cities are twisted into nightmarish landscapes of purported horror, rife with murder and manslaughter.

Genuine hardships are layered with countless fabricated terrors, fostering an atmosphere of madness within the political life of nations. The ideology of post-liberalism exaggerates the complexities of liberal democracy to such an extent that its proponents openly advocate for dictatorship, often with little attempt at concealment. Alarmingly, this ideology has gained traction within the United States, a leading Western democracy.

Similar trends are evident across Europe, though their manifestations differ based on varying political cultures and electoral systems. Multi-party systems exhibit distinct dynamics compared to first-past-the-post systems, which frequently result in de facto two-party arrangements.

In Europe, right-wing populist and far-right parties are on the ascent, seeking to pull traditional conservative and Christian Democratic parties in their wake. Should these conservative parties succumb to this temptation, they risk their own decline. Conversely, resisting this pull could alienate the more radical and frustrated segments of their support base, pushing them towards the “crazy right.” This objectively presents a precarious situation.

Recent months have seen two European nations respond to these challenges in contrasting ways. In Austria, the far-right FPÖ emerged as the dominant force in parliamentary elections. Initial attempts by conservatives, social democrats, and liberals to form a government faltered. Subsequently, the conservative People’s Party initially agreed to join a government led by the extreme right-wing agitator Herbert Kickl. However, when these negotiations also collapsed, the conservatives, social democrats, and liberals successfully formed a coalition government.

This tumultuous process appears to have been instructive for the three parties. They not only agreed on a joint government programme but also established a shared rhetoric of reasonableness. This coalition, uniting centre-left and centre-right forces, has, at least for now, operated with a remarkable spirit of “reasonable centrism.” Even the conservative People’s Party, which had sharply veered to the right in recent years, engaging in a competitive drive with right-wing radicals, has seemingly retreated from this dead end. Those familiar with Austrian political norms have been pleasantly surprised by this development.

The “crazy right” consistently elevates the temperature of political discourse through vicious polemics, fearmongering, the dissemination of fake news, and the manufacturing of outrage. Engaging in a contest with them on these terms is a losing proposition. Therefore, to continue the metaphor, it is crucial to lower the temperature of the debate. The three Austrian parties recognise the necessity of successfully implementing this strategy to prevent the “crazy right” from seizing power.

Germany, a leading European democracy, recently found itself in a situation with striking similarities, though not identical. The now officially far-right extremist AfD emerged as the second strongest party, securing 20.8 percent of the vote. Media discourse exhibited a favourable inclination towards them, fixating on issues such as migration and crime.

Following the election, realistic government formation options were limited, primarily pointing towards a coalition between the conservative Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats. While some conservatives may have entertained the notion of an alliance with the right-wing radicals, practical political considerations have, for now, blocked that path. Consequently, the conservatives and Social Democrats have formed an alliance, with Friedrich Merz, the leader of the CDU, becoming Chancellor, and Lars Klingbeil, the SPD’s leading figure, assuming the role of Vice-Chancellor.

However, following the debate of recent weeks, concern is mounting. Have the future government partners genuinely learned their lesson? Mere days after the alliance agreement was signed, disagreements arose regarding its interpretation. The conservatives have nominated several government members who echo the rhetoric of the “crazy right.” Christoph de Vries, known for his racial classification of people and for promoting ethno-nationalist positions barely distinguishable from those of the extreme right, has been appointed as a form of Deputy State Secretary for the Interior.

Wolfram Weimer has been selected as Minister of State for Culture. Confronted with modernisation, liberalisation, and the heterogeneity of contemporary societies, he voices fears of the Untergang des Abendlandes (the demise of the Occident), a long-standing right-wing conservative panic that has historically served as a rallying cry for the paranoid and extreme right. His socio-political views would position him as a fitting commentator for right-wing Fox News.

How can the heated and absurd discourse be calmed when it is being fuelled by figures within a centrist government? Attempting to render the extreme right superfluous by mimicking its tenets and thereby legitimising them has historically proven ineffective and is unlikely to succeed this time.

Ultimately, the alliance between Christian Democrats and Social Democrats, much like its Austrian counterpart, is an emergency coalition. The Berlin alliance has already pushed through a significant decision even before its formal establishment: one trillion euros are to be allocated for armaments, as well as urgently needed infrastructure and climate protection measures, through a reform of the strict German fiscal regulations. This move is also intended to stimulate the economy, ensure growth and jobs, and modernise the economic landscape. Such measures are urgently required, as Germany is not only in a persistent recession but is also grappling with a structural crisis within its economic model.

This context underscores the critical importance of the government pursuing a spirit of unity and refraining from engaging in the bitter culture wars that the extreme right so eagerly promotes. However, there is a tangible risk that German conservatism, currently facing a profound crisis of orientation, may attempt to combat radicals while simultaneously adopting key elements of the “crazy right.” This approach is destined for failure and would lead to a familiar and detrimental consequence of such coalitions: parties would govern together in an alliance, yet in reality, they would govern against one another.

Ultimately, the sole beneficiary of such a scenario would be the “crazy right.” It is hoped that all parties involved are acutely aware of this potential outcome.

This is a joint column with IPS Journal

Robert Misik
Robert Misik

Robert Misik is a writer and essayist in Vienna. He publishes in many outlets, including Die Zeit and Die Tageszeitung. His awards include the John Maynard Keynes Society prize for economic journalism.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983467f bb39 37d5862ca0d5 0 Ending Britain’s “Brief Encounter” with BrexitStefan Stern
u421983485 2 The Future of American Soft PowerJoseph S. Nye
u4219834676d582029 038f 486a 8c2b fe32db91c9b0 2 Trump Can’t Kill the Boom: Why the US Economy Will Roar Despite HimNouriel Roubini
u42198346fb0de2b847 0 How the Billionaire Boom Is Fueling Inequality—and Threatening DemocracyFernanda Balata and Sebastian Mang
u421983441e313714135 0 Why Europe Needs Its Own AI InfrastructureDiane Coyle

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

KU Leuven advertisement

The Politics of Unpaid Work

This new book published by Oxford University Press presents the findings of the multiannual ERC research project “Researching Precariousness Across the Paid/Unpaid Work Continuum”,
led by Valeria Pulignano (KU Leuven), which are very important for the prospects of a more equal Europe.

Unpaid labour is no longer limited to the home or volunteer work. It infiltrates paid jobs, eroding rights and deepening inequality. From freelancers’ extra hours to care workers’ unpaid duties, it sustains precarity and fuels inequity. This book exposes the hidden forces behind unpaid labour and calls for systemic change to confront this pressing issue.

DOWNLOAD HERE FOR FREE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641