Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

Youth Unemployment – How Do The Austrians Do It?

by Johannes Kopf on 20th March 2014

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Johannes Kopf

Johannes Kopf

In 11 EU member states youth unemployment is over than 25% and it is 49% or higher in Croatia, Spain and Greece. This fact is not a purely national problem. Instead, it constitutes one of the biggest challenges currently faced by the EU. Yet among its neighbours, Austria’s position is surprisingly stable due to its prized dual education system.

“Europa schaut nach Österreich” (Die Zeit), “The Austrian Miracle” (Foreign Policy), “Österreich gilt als Vorbild in der europäischen Arbeitsmarktpolitik” (FAZ), “Autriche, voyage au pays du plein-emploi” (L’Expansion) and “El secreto del bajo paro juvenil en Austria” (El Pais) are only a few of the international headlines focused on Austria’s labour market policy.

Not only is attention coming from foreign media, many top European politicians – recently the French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault – have turned to Austria in search of solutions to rising unemployment.

Austria’s low youth unemployment rates in particular, have garnered significant interest. But what are the main reasons behind Austria’s outstanding international ranking in this area?

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Strong economic development

Over the past decade, Austria’s entire economic situation has developed far better than that of most other European countries. While average growth in real GDP terms was only 1.64% – reduced mainly by the global crisis of 2009 – this rate was substantially higher than the euro zone’s average (just under 1%) and noticeably above the EU 27 average (1.21%). In large part, this development already explains Austria’s superior labour market situation within the EU.

Austria’s economic policy reveals many reasons for the state’s exemplary GDP development. Close economic ties to the German “economic locomotive” and the savvy of many domestic companies to profit from Eastern European markets, are telling explanations.

‘Dual Education System’

From a labour market policy perspective, the dual education model also offers undeniable advantages over any other education system:

First, it is always up-to-date. If the economy changes, or if production methods or provision of services change, trainees immediately learn to meet new demands. By nature, a predetermined school curriculum will always be behind the curve.

Second, following every school education, each graduate confronts the necessity of a job search. This step in particular, is often no longer necessary after concluding an apprenticeship. Many young trainees simply remain employed in the company where they received training.

Flexibility plus security

In Italy, where youth unemployment is currently over 40%, termination procedures are often drawn out for many years due to outdated termination protection – and similar problems exist in France or Spain. Is it not understandable then, that firms in these countries are hesitant to employ new personnel during unstable economic times?


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

For example: If a firm in one of these countries recieves an additional order that cannot be carried out by the current workforce, this order will either be rejected or the firm will cover the extra demand with overtime. Otherwise, they may also attempt to circumvent strict regulation using temporary agency work, legally dubious ostensible-self-employment schemes, or even resort to moonlighting.

Meanwhile, Austrian firms even employ additional personnel in tough economic times because they can be laid off when there are fewer orders. Still, those affected by cut-backs are not left to fend for themselves. By means of targeted support, a strong and active labour market policy ensures that people who have lost their jobs find new ones – whether through improving their qualifications, wage subsidies or other measures.

In times such as these, a modern and highly developed labour market needs both flexibility for the firm and security for the employee. Security in this sense, means the assurance of a proper social safeguard through support for strong, active labour market policy while also offering a consistent life-long learning strategy.

A strong, active labour market policy

Austria deserve great praise for the intervention strength of the Austrian Public Employment Service (AMS). The country currently has the lowest unemployment rate in the entire EU and thus comparatively less political pressure on this issue. Nevertheless, to pay for its various services the AMS  has the fourth highest budget (proportionate to GDP and the unemployment rate) in the EU.

Therefore, if the AMS continues to be praised as one of the best labour market administrations in Europe, it must not be forgotten that there is a substantial budget in place to support the fight against unemployment in Austria.

The apprenticeship guarantee for young people in Austria

The most important labour market policy goal is the prevention of youth unemployment. This is completely uncontested among all parties and the social partners. Here, the most effective tool is the so-called “apprenticeship guarantee”, a model which also guides the political endeavour of the European Union to implement the so-called “European Youth Guarantee”.

The “apprenticeship guarantee” is a promise to each young person who wants to do an apprenticeship that they will be able to pursue such training if – despite the comprehensive support programme for companies offering apprenticeships – no vacant position is found.

Why is this apprenticeship guarantee so important and so necessary for young people that the Austrian state continues to pay more than €10,000 annually for each of these public apprenticeship positions?

We all know the answer: In Europe, jobs for people without vocational training or without higher education are quickly disappearing. This trend can even be seen in Austria where unemployment rates based on educational attainment have been recorded annually since 1990. Over 22 years, the so-called registered unemployment rate (national calculations different from EUROSTAT) of graduates (2,7%), people with the Austrian school-leaving certificate (4.2%), or apprenticeship certificate (6.5%) has largely remained stable. However, the unemployment rate among people with only a mandatory school-leaving qualification has more than doubled, increasing from 9,5% to 20,9%.

Why? An example sheds light on this issue: If a warehouseman used to get a job because he was strong, today this position requires knowledge of warehouse logistics software, communication with various departments, a licence to operate a fork-lift-truck and often the additional ability to organise one’s work independently; all of these competences require training. More and more young Austrians have begun to understand and accept this logic. After all, only around 7.5% still stop after compulsory schooling.

However, despite having the lowest unemployment in the EU, despite an apprenticeship guarantee and despite the corresponding low share of early school leavers compared with other EU member states, the same troubling developments as elsewhere can also be discerned from the unemployment rates according to education level in Austria. They are affected by the proliferation of technology, promotion of sustainable production and globalisation to name just a few factors. In short, we can no longer afford to keep “producing” so many young people with only a limited education.

This is precisely why the new government in Austria has planned to introduce mandatory education up to the age of 18 in its government programme. In Austria, we also understand that the way is a long one. However we know – and this is said with the utmost humility – we are on the right one.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ Youth Unemployment – How Do The Austrians Do It?

Filed Under: Politics

About Johannes Kopf

Johannes Kopf has been a member of the board of directors at the Austrian Public Employment Service (AMS) since 2006. He worked for the Federation of Austrian Industry (IV) as well as in the cabinet of the Austrian Federal Minister for Economics and Labour, Martin Bartenstein.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards