Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

EU Income Inequality And The Great Recession

by Carlos Vacas-Soriano and Enrique Fernández-Macías on 21st March 2017 @eurofound

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Carlos Vacas-Soriano

Carlos Vacas-Soriano

EU-wide income inequality declined notably prior to 2008, driven by a strong process of income convergence between European countries. The Great Recession broke this trend. After 2008, income convergence has been sluggish, while inequality within many countries has increased significantly.

Despite the implicit assumption stemming from many EU policy documents that European economic integration should lead to some degree of convergence between countries, studies adopting an EU-wide approach to mapping trends in income disparities remain surprisingly sparse. These are, however, especially necessary when the process of European integration has first been accelerated by the adoption of the euro and EU enlargement towards the East and then dramatically put to the test by the uneven impact of the Great Recession across Europe. In an earlier study and a very recent one for Eurofound we help to fill in this gap by mapping income inequalities from a truly EU-wide perspective between 2004-2013.

Enrique-Fernández-Macías

Enrique-Fernández-Macías

A Single European Income Distribution

Adopting an EU-wide perspective on income inequality requires considering income levels across European countries as part of a single EU-wide income distribution which reflects income disparities both between and within Member States. This is done in figure 1 showing the percentage of European individuals aged 15-64 (vertical axis) reporting different levels of equivalised household disposable income (horizontal axis). For instance, around 4.5% of Europeans of working age have an (equivalised) household disposable income between €10,000 and €11,000 per year.

Two main insights emerge regarding income disparities. One, income disparities between countries are evidenced by the different positions of countries, with Eastern European countries (and Mediterranean countries to a lesser extent) being much more present in the bottom income quintile, while EU15 countries account for almost all the people found in the top quintile. Two, there is also a significant overlap in national income distributions (for instance the countries dominating the top quintile also have a significant share of population in the lowest income quintile), showing that income disparities within countries are larger than income disparities between countries in the European Union.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

Figure 1.EU household disposable income distribution in PPS-euro, 2013 (Source: EU-SILC)

Table 1 provides a dynamic picture of the evolution of EU-wide income inequalities and the main forces behind it. While inequalities within countries represent the lion’s share of EU-wide income inequality levels, the evolution of disparities in average income between countries has played a key role during the period:

  • EU income inequalities declined notably before the crisis, as measured both by the Gini and the Theil index. The latter shows that this was almost entirely due to a process of convergence in average income levels between countries, since inequalities within countries declined only very slightly.
  • From 2008, the trend reversed, with EU-wide income inequalities modestly growing: the process of income convergence between countries faltered and an upwards trend in domestic inequalities developed.
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Gini 0.355 0.344 0.343 0.337 0.330 0.333 0.333 0.333 0.334 0.336
Theil-Total 0.231 0.213 0.212 0.211 0.196 0.200 0.203 0.198 0.202 0.201
Theil-Between 0.056 0.047 0.047 0.038 0.031 0.033 0.031 0.032 0.032 0.031
Theil-Within 0.175 0.165 0.166 0.174 0.165 0.167 0.173 0.166 0.170 0.171
Table 1. EU household disposable income inequality, Gini and Theil indexes (Source: EU-SILC)

Income Disparities Between European Countries

A detailed picture of the income convergence process between countries is provided by figure 2, which depicts relative average household disposable income levels in comparable terms and their change before and after the crisis:

  • The pre-crisis convergence was largely a catch-up process among low-income countries, particularly strong in Eastern Europe (apart from Spain, Mediterranean countries failed to converge). In most high-income countries, income levels remained stable or even declined (notably in the UK) until 2008.
  • After 2008, Mediterranean countries saw a decline in income levels while most Eastern European countries continued to grow but at a much lower rate. This, together with a return of income growth in the UK and Germany, led to a halt in the process of EU income convergence.

 

Figure 2. Average household disposable income across countries (in PPP, EU24 = 100)


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

Income inequalities Within European Countries

Table 2 compares trends in income inequalities across countries before and after the effect of the public tax and benefit system is considered. Two main insights emerge.

One, the Great Recession pushed market income inequalities upwards across almost all countries, and the main driver was labour income losses associated with unemployment. This is reflected by the fact that those countries most affected by growing unemployment between 2008 and 2013 are among those that suffered the largest surges in market inequalities (Mediterranean countries generally and Ireland), while the contrary applies to the European core countries generally (such as Germany, France, Austria, Luxembourg or the UK). Although not shown in the figure, the same labour market turbulences pushing market income inequalities upwards resulted in relatively stable levels of wage inequality (and even declining in some of the countries most hit by unemployment as Greece), since lower-paid employees were more likely to lose their job than the rest.

Two, the redistributive effect of European welfare states largely cushioned these growing inequalities, as reflected by significantly larger inequality increases in household market income than in household disposable income across several countries (Mediterranean countries generally, Latvia, Belgium, Netherlands, Finland or the UK),.

Household disposable income inequalities expanded in two-thirds of EU Member States between 2008 and 2013, and not only in peripheral countries severely impacted by the Great Recession but as well in some traditionally more egalitarian countries in the European core (Germany or Sweden). However, the increases have been quite moderate and only above 10% in seven countries (Cyprus, Hungary, Estonia, Denmark, Slovenia, Spain and Ireland). On the contrary, household disposable income inequalities fell in one third of the countries over the same period (Luxembourg, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the UK, France, The Netherlands and Portugal).

Overall, the Great Recession reversed previous trends and pushed income inequalities upwards across most European countries largely due to growing unemployment, while EU-wide inequalities increased partially due to the income convergence between countries stalling. Nevertheless, the surges in income inequalities were generally moderate largely as a result of the cushioning impact of European tax and benefit systems.

 

Table 2. Income inequalities and unemployment across European countries (Source: EU-SILC). Countries have been ranked by the relative increase in household disposable income inequalities in the period 2008-2013.

This blog is based on research carried out by the authors for Eurofound

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ EU Income Inequality And The Great Recession

Filed Under: Economy

About Carlos Vacas-Soriano and Enrique Fernández-Macías

Carlos Vacas-Soriano and Enrique Fernández-Macías are research managers at Eurofound.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards