Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Europe ‘outsourcing’ asylum to Africa

Laura Lambert and Martin Lemberg-Pedersen 20th April 2023

Outsourcing asylum to African countries is a terrible idea—there are alternatives.

For 40 years, western governments have entertained ideas of ‘outsourcing’ asylum processing and refugee hosting to the global south. It is not a new idea. And neither are the controversies that have accompanied it.

Denmark and the United Kingdom have been in the news over this recently. In January, however, after fierce domestic criticism, the new Danish government announced it had paused its negotiations with Rwanda to ‘transfer’ bilaterally all asylum-seekers out of Denmark. Instead it suggested building a European Union alliance to do the same. This step appeared at odds with the criticism of the Danish plans from the European Commission and the European Parliament.

The UK, too, wanted to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda. The plan was temporarily halted by the European Court of Human Rights in 2022. For its part, the British High Court did not condemn the policy as illegal. So it may be revived.

In line with these and other recent policy initiatives, the prominent migration researcher Ruud Koopmans supported the idea of sending asylum-seekers to Tunisia. His endorsement was poorly timed, coming right after the African Union condemned Tunisia for systematic racist violence against sub-Saharan migrants.

We have conducted research into European policies to discourage immigrants and implementation of emergency refugee evacuations from Libya to Niger. This highlights the risks and frequent failures of outsourcing schemes, while suggesting more pragmatic alternatives for European asylum policies.

Why these policies fail

Initiatives to outsource asylum—known as ‘externalisation’—have frequently failed on different levels. First, since the 1980s, there has not been enough political support in Europe for these radical ideas. Although vocal, proponents have remained a minority at the European level.

Secondly, international organisations have voiced sustained criticism. The United Nations high commissioner for refugees (UNHCR) implored the Danish government to abandon its externalisation ambitions. It said they undermined international solidarity and could lead to chain refoulement—when one state after another successively deports a person under inhumane and degrading conditions. Instead, it encouraged Denmark to focus on improving safe and orderly access to asylum.

Thirdly, most countries have repeatedly rejected hosting these schemes. The AU condemned the Danish plans in 2021. It said developing countries already hosted 85 per cent of the world’s refugees and such policies were xenophobic. A growing academic literature argues that such externalisation policies represent a continuation of racialising colonial practices of transferring displaced people through imperial territories.

In practice, these proposals offer little substance, more hot air. They appear designed to appeal to domestic voters rather than to solve displacement.

For instance, in 2018 the European Council proposed taking people who had been trying to reach Europe on boats in the Mediterranean to centres in north Africa for asylum processing. It remained a press release issued by national ministers unconnected to any EU policy process. The AU criticised the proposal as a violation of international law.

Yet Germany recently revisited these plans—though only in a press interview. This seemed geared to accommodate conservative voters after government announcements of liberalising residency and citizenship legislation.

Announcing such plans without consulting potential partner states or regional bodies suggests revived colonial fantasies where all states in the global south can be paid off. It also demonstrates complete disregard for any opposition among such states’ electorates.

Niger and Rwanda

Certainly, Europe’s financial-cum-political incentives can weigh on sub-Saharan governments. Rwanda received £140 million from the UK in advance to build accommodation. It has used Danish and British aspirations to silence criticism of its support for the M23 militia in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Niger received international praise for hosting refugees evacuated from Libyan prisons. Beyond new diplomatic recognition, it received additional resources for its asylum bureaucracy. These included a permanent camp infrastructure and salary increases for senior officials.

However, despite these incentives, outsourcing asylum risks also creates tensions in partner states. First, refugees may get stuck in transit because their asylum claims are rejected or because western governments abandon promises of resettlement.

In mid-2019, around 120 of 2,900 evacuees faced a rejection of their refugee claims. Both responsible Nigerien officials and refugees refused their legalisation in Niger for various reasons. The lack of economic opportunities in Niger weighed heavily on the refugees, as did the precarious security situation on the officials. And, according to UNHCR staff in Niger, the government of Burkina Faso refused to host these refugees after hearing about Niger’s difficulties.

Secondly, outsourcing asylum procedures presupposes that the rule of law is functioning in the partner state. In Niger, the appeals process was neither operational nor independent. For one thing, the appeal committee had not met for three years and consisted of the same departments as the first instance.

Political alternatives

If politicians really want to reduce deaths in the Mediterranean, often used as the purported motivation for externalisation, they should stop criminalising sea rescue. EU states could also make it possible to claim asylum at embassies or consulates. Several European countries allowed this until the early 2000s. Similarly, humanitarian visas could be issued from embassies, as argued by European Parliament members in 2016. This requires more resources for screening and case-processing.

These would be real steps towards dismantling so-called smuggling economies, whose incentives have only increased with the one-sided EU focus on deterrence and border control. Safe entry procedures would be an approach fundamentally different from containing displaced populations far from Europe. A modern and pragmatic migration policy should abandon postcolonial illusions that massive global inequalities and displacement can be addressed through deterrence and the outsourcing of refugee protection to third countries.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence

Laura Lambert
Laura Lambert

Laura Lambert is interim head of the research cluster 'Patterns of (Forced) Migration' at the Arnold Bergstraesser Institute in Freiburg. Her PhD on 'everyday externalization' (funded by the Max Planck Society) was an ethnographic exploration of EU externalisation of refugee protection to Niger and its unintended consequences.

Martin Lemberg Pedersen
Martin Lemberg-Pedersen

Martin Lemberg-Pedersen is an honorary associate professor at the University of Warwick and head of policy and society for Amnesty International, Denmark.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983467f bb39 37d5862ca0d5 0 Ending Britain’s “Brief Encounter” with BrexitStefan Stern
u421983485 2 The Future of American Soft PowerJoseph S. Nye
u4219834676d582029 038f 486a 8c2b fe32db91c9b0 2 Trump Can’t Kill the Boom: Why the US Economy Will Roar Despite HimNouriel Roubini
u42198346fb0de2b847 0 How the Billionaire Boom Is Fueling Inequality—and Threatening DemocracyFernanda Balata and Sebastian Mang
u421983441e313714135 0 Why Europe Needs Its Own AI InfrastructureDiane Coyle

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

KU Leuven advertisement

The Politics of Unpaid Work

This new book published by Oxford University Press presents the findings of the multiannual ERC research project “Researching Precariousness Across the Paid/Unpaid Work Continuum”,
led by Valeria Pulignano (KU Leuven), which are very important for the prospects of a more equal Europe.

Unpaid labour is no longer limited to the home or volunteer work. It infiltrates paid jobs, eroding rights and deepening inequality. From freelancers’ extra hours to care workers’ unpaid duties, it sustains precarity and fuels inequity. This book exposes the hidden forces behind unpaid labour and calls for systemic change to confront this pressing issue.

DOWNLOAD HERE FOR FREE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641