Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Health and safety: Europe’s patchy commitment

Claes-Mikael Ståhl and Owen Tudor 6th October 2022

The European Union must stop compromising on the fundamental right of workers to health and safety.

International Labour Organization,ILO,health and safety,OSH,occupational safety and health
Workplace accidents are preventable (King Ropes Access / shutterstock.com)

All compromise is based on give and take, but there can be no give and take on fundamentals. Any compromise on mere fundamentals is a surrender. For it is all give and no take.

Mahatma Gandhi

In June, the International Labour Conference recognised as fundamental the right to a safe and healthy working environment. Governments, employers and trade unions across the world agreed that the International Labour Organization conventions 155 (adopted in 1983) and 187 (2006) were core.

This elevation of these conventions will support the common good in all European societies. Good occupational safety and health (OSH) is a win-win-win for workers, employers and governments, and prevention of risks is key.

Workers obviously benefit because they suffer less injury and illness, but they also avoid financial ill-effects. Employers see productivity improve because activity is not disrupted by accidents or sickness absences; insurance premia are reduced along with staff turnover, while there are reputational gains among customers and potential employees.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Governments in turn can spend less on associated healthcare, injury, illness and unemployment benefits, while taking in more in tax receipts. These are just the most obvious benefits of enhanced health and safety.

Three-year campaign

The decision in June was the culmination of a three-year campaign by trade unions, progressive governments, OSH professionals and victims’ groups. It represented the first amendment to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work since its adoption almost a quarter-century ago, in 1998.

Sadly, in those three years of campaigning, to overcome objections from employers and governments showing a cavalier attitude to workers’ lives, almost nine million work-related deaths took place—on top of millions more workplace injuries and illnesses—around the world. Death is of course inevitable, but work-related deaths are all preventable.

Having secured international agreement on the principle of safe and healthy work, unions are turning their attention to the harder task of putting that into practice. European Union governments were in the progressive camp in June, along with those in Africa and north America, and the EU is a leading global actor on OSH legislation.

Yet there is a gap between the standards and their application. Only 11 of the EU’s 27 member states have ratified both core conventions—155 covers OSH, 187 its promotion. A further nine have ratified one or other but seven have committed to neither: Italy, Bulgaria, Estonia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland and Romania. This is not acceptable.

Among other things, the conventions require of states-party: establishment of tripartite national bodies, consultation of workers on risk assessment and management, workplace safety committees and a right for workers to refuse work likely to harm them. They promote participation by workers and their trade unions in the identification and prevention of risks.

That makes workplaces safer. Union pressure is a major factor in driving preventative measures and realising the employer’s duty to ensure the health and safety of employees, regardless of where they work.

Hypocritical position

European governments often claim the standards laid down in EU health-and-safety directives are anyway as good as, or better than, those required by the ILO core conventions—which simply begs the question as to why those conventions have not already been ratified. In any event, work-related deaths across the EU give the lie to such complacency.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Given that these conventions are now deemed fundamental, and automatically part of the acquis communautaire, the EU could soon be in the hypocritical position of requiring applicant countries in the Balkans and elsewhere in eastern Europe to adopt ILO conventions not universally adopted inside the union. An uneven and fragmented legal framework in OSH provides for ‘social dumping’, based on the lowering of health-and-safety protections for workers involving different member states.

New Zealand, which has ratified convention 155 (though not 187), insisted that the recently concluded EU-NZ trade agreement include an enforceable commitment to the core conventions. This is something the EU should itself be demanding in future trade agreements.

The European Trade Union Confederation, working with its global equivalent, the International Trade Union Confederation, and national trade union movements, is putting the European Commission and the 16 member states which have not yet ratified both core conventions on notice. Our message is: stop compromising on workers’ fundamental right to a safe and healthy working environment. Ratify the core conventions, implement them and build them into national law and practice and international trade, investment and aid agreements.

Claes Mikael Ståhl
Claes-Mikael Ståhl

Claes-Mikael Ståhl has been deputy general secretary at the European Trade Union Confederation since September 2021. He deals with trade, mobility, employment, cohesion funds and occupational health and safety.

Owen Tudor
Owen Tudor

Owen Tudor is deputy general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation.

You are here: Home / Economy / Health and safety: Europe’s patchy commitment

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube