Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Projects
    • Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era
    • US Election 2020
    • The Transformation of Work
    • The Coronavirus Crisis and the Welfare State
    • Just Transition
    • Artificial intelligence, work and society
    • What is inequality?
    • Europe 2025
    • The Crisis Of Globalisation
  • Audiovisual
    • Audio Podcast
    • Video Podcasts
    • Social Europe Talk Videos
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Shop
  • Membership
  • Ads
  • Newsletter

How Law and Justice (mis)used the pandemic to dismantle social dialogue in Poland

by Adam Rogalewski on 21st April 2020 @rogalewskiadam

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn

With the independence of Poland’s judiciary already compromised, the autonomy of social partnership has become the latest target of the ruling populists.

social partnership Poland
Adam Rogalewski

On March 31st the Polish parliament adopted the Act on Special Solutions Related to the Prevention, Counteracting and Combating of Covid. Its title suggests the act’s focus should be on tackling the crisis caused by the coronavirus. In reality, however, the government and politicians of the Law and Justice Party (PiS) have used the pandemic to limit social dialogue in Poland.

Initially, the government intended the bill to exclude trade unions from representing workers if, during the crisis, employers planned to introduce special measures amending workers’ terms and conditions. Following union protests, the regulation was removed from the draft before submission to parliament.

But the unions’ relief was brief. To their and the employers’ surprise, a group of PiS MPs in the lower chamber (Sejm) introduced two amendments on the functioning of the Social Dialogue Council (the Polish tripartite body), which allowed the prime minster, Mateusz Morawiecki, to dismiss members of the council.

Make your email inbox interesting again!

"Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading!"

Polly Toynbee

Columnist for The Guardian

Thank you very much for your interest! Now please check your email to confirm your subscription.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

Powered by ConvertKit

The bill was then debated in the upper chamber (Senate), dominated by the opposition, which rejected the amendments. It came back to the Sejm for final approval and—regardless of protests by the social partners, as well as of the higher majority required to reject Senate amendments—the Sejm approved the regulations restricting the independence of the council.

The same day, the Polish president, Andrzej Duda, also of the PiS party, signed the act. It came immediately into force.

Symbolic gesture

In a somewhat symbolic gesture, Duda later decided to submit the regulations on the council to the Constitutional Tribunal, to assess whether they were in line with the Polish constitution. The Constitutional Tribunal is however totally dependent on the PiS, which has appointed almost all of its judges (in a process heavily criticised by the European Commission). Involving the tribunal seems to have been little more like a smokescreen to divert public and social partners’ criticisms.

The act caused outrage among the Polish, and European, social partners, because of how it exploited the pandemic to dismantle social dialogue. In a joint letter, the European social partners told Morawiecki and Duda:

The autonomy of Social Partners is a founding element of social dialogue, guaranteed by international and European law. Furthermore, social dialogue is a key instrument to fight against the economic and social consequences of Covid-19 and Governments, all over Europe, should be supporting social partners for them to succeed in this endeavor. Therefore, we do not understand that a new legal act allowing the Prime Minister to dismiss at will members of the Social Dialogue Council during the Covid-19 pandemic was adopted in Poland.

Importantly, one of the two regulations on the council, article 46, has no time limit on its validity and will be still in force after the end of the pandemic. And while article 85 allows the prime minister to dismiss members of the council only during this emergency, article 46 allows him to do so under two circumstances: if they co-operated with the Communist security authorities under the former regime or engaged in inappropriate actions against the council which was unable to conduct transparent, substantive and regular dialogue among workers and employers’ organisations and the government side. The second reason, being extremely ambiguous, could be easily used to remove any member who did not support government policies in the future.


We need your help! Please support our cause.


As you may know, Social Europe is an independent publisher. We aren't backed by a large publishing house, big advertising partners or a multi-million euro enterprise. For the longevity of Social Europe we depend on our loyal readers - we depend on you.

Become a Social Europe Member

Difficult to comprehend

The logic behind the PiS decision remains difficult to comprehend. The party not only alienated the social partners and reduced their trust to the lowest possible level but offended its closest supporter—the Solidarność trade union. It was the first time during the lifetime of PiS governments that the union made such a strong anti-government statement:

Unfortunately—and this is the worst of all—trust has been undermined, and undermined trust cannot be easily rebuilt. Solidarność does not forget such things and this will have its negative consequences in the future.

Maybe what motivated the PiS is simple: it showed again its intention to build an authoritarian system, without democratic supervision, and so without independent social partners. It may have been a deliberate decision to introduce the regulation using its own MPs—as with some previously adopted controversial acts—to offer the government impunity.

Recently, a group of opposition MPs submitted a bill, which proposed to revise the act by removing the articles related to the council. The bill was remitted for its first reading in the relevant commission of the Sejm.

The PiS demonstrated that, within a couple of days, it was able to neuter social dialogue in Poland. While hoping that the Constitutional Tribunal will remove the regulations on the council or a corrective bill will be approved by the parliament, the social partners, in Poland and in Europe, need to remain vigilant. The Covid-19 crisis is just the beginning—and we can expect more attacks on social-partner autonomy.

TwitterFacebookLinkedIn
Home ・ How Law and Justice (mis)used the pandemic to dismantle social dialogue in Poland

Filed Under: Politics

About Adam Rogalewski

Adam Rogalewski is director of the international department of OPZZ (All-Poland Alliance of Trade Unions) and a member of the European Economic and Social Committee. He has a PhD from London Metropolitan University. Previously Adam was employed by Unison, the British public-services union, and Unia, the Swiss general trade union.

Partner Ads

Most Recent Posts

Thomas Piketty,capital Capital and ideology: interview with Thomas Piketty Thomas Piketty
pushbacks Border pushbacks: it’s time for impunity to end Hope Barker
gig workers Gig workers’ rights and their strategic litigation Aude Cefaliello and Nicola Countouris
European values,EU values,fundamental values European values: making reputational damage stick Michele Bellini and Francesco Saraceno
centre left,representation gap,dissatisfaction with democracy Closing the representation gap Sheri Berman

Most Popular Posts

sovereignty Brexit and the misunderstanding of sovereignty Peter Verovšek
globalisation of labour,deglobalisation The first global event in the history of humankind Branko Milanovic
centre-left, Democratic Party The Biden victory and the future of the centre-left EJ Dionne Jr
eurozone recovery, recovery package, Financial Stability Review, BEAST Light in the tunnel or oncoming train? Adam Tooze
Brexit deal, no deal Barrelling towards the ‘Brexit’ cliff edge Paul Mason

Other Social Europe Publications

Whither Social Rights in (Post-)Brexit Europe?
Year 30: Germany’s Second Chance
Artificial intelligence
Social Europe Volume Three
Social Europe – A Manifesto

Social Europe Publishing book

The Brexit endgame is upon us: deal or no deal, the transition period will end on January 1st. With a pandemic raging, for those countries most affected by Brexit the end of the transition could not come at a worse time. Yet, might the UK's withdrawal be a blessing in disguise? With its biggest veto player gone, might the European Pillar of Social Rights take centre stage? This book brings together leading experts in European politics and policy to examine social citizenship rights across the European continent in the wake of Brexit. Will member states see an enhanced social Europe or a race to the bottom?

'This book correctly emphasises the need to place the future of social rights in Europe front and centre in the post-Brexit debate, to move on from the economistic bias that has obscured our vision of a progressive social Europe.' Michael D Higgins, president of Ireland


MORE INFO

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of the EU recovery and resilience facility

This policy brief analyses the macroeconomic effects of the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). We present the basics of the RRF and then use the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to analyse the facility's macroeconomic effects. The simulations show, first, that if the funds are in fact used to finance additional public investment (as intended), public capital stocks throughout the EU will increase markedly during the time of the RRF. Secondly, in some especially hard-hit southern European countries, the RRF would offset a significant share of the output lost during the pandemic. Thirdly, as gains in GDP due to the RRF will be much stronger in (poorer) southern and eastern European countries, the RRF has the potential to reduce economic divergence. Finally, and in direct consequence of the increased GDP, the RRF will lead to lower public debt ratios—between 2.0 and 4.4 percentage points below baseline for southern European countries in 2023.


FREE DOWNLOAD

ETUI advertisement

Benchmarking Working Europe 2020

A virus is haunting Europe. This year’s 20th anniversary issue of our flagship publication Benchmarking Working Europe brings to a growing audience of trade unionists, industrial relations specialists and policy-makers a warning: besides SARS-CoV-2, ‘austerity’ is the other nefarious agent from which workers, and Europe as a whole, need to be protected in the months and years ahead. Just as the scientific community appears on the verge of producing one or more effective and affordable vaccines that could generate widespread immunity against SARS-CoV-2, however, policy-makers, at both national and European levels, are now approaching this challenging juncture in a way that departs from the austerity-driven responses deployed a decade ago, in the aftermath of the previous crisis. It is particularly apt for the 20th anniversary issue of Benchmarking, a publication that has allowed the ETUI and the ETUC to contribute to key European debates, to set out our case for a socially responsive and ecologically sustainable road out of the Covid-19 crisis.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Eurofound advertisement

Industrial relations: developments 2015-2019

Eurofound has monitored and analysed developments in industrial relations systems at EU level and in EU member states for over 40 years. This new flagship report provides an overview of developments in industrial relations and social dialogue in the years immediately prior to the Covid-19 outbreak. Findings are placed in the context of the key developments in EU policy affecting employment, working conditions and social policy, and linked to the work done by social partners—as well as public authorities—at European and national levels.


CLICK FOR MORE INFO

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Read FEPS Covid Response Papers

In this moment, more than ever, policy-making requires support and ideas to design further responses that can meet the scale of the problem. FEPS contributes to this reflection with policy ideas, analysis of the different proposals and open reflections with the new FEPS Covid Response Papers series and the FEPS Covid Response Webinars. The latest FEPS Covid Response Paper by the Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz, 'Recovering from the pandemic: an appraisal of lessons learned', provides an overview of the failures and successes in dealing with Covid-19 and its economic aftermath. Among the authors: Lodewijk Asscher, László Andor, Estrella Durá, Daniela Gabor, Amandine Crespy, Alberto Botta, Francesco Corti, and many more.


CLICK HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Find Social Europe Content

Search Social Europe

Project Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

.EU Web Awards