Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

How to restore workers’ rights

Sharan Burrow 19th July 2022

The grim statistics on workers’ rights will only be righted if global standards are properly enforced.

trade unions,collective bargaining,workers' rights,ILO,International Labour Organization
Eyes down: Turkey is one of the ten worst performers in the ITUC Global Rights Index (seyephoto/shutterstock.com)

This year’s Global Rights Index from the International Trade Union Confederation, the ninth annual edition of the comprehensive review of workers’ rights worldwide, revealed a continuing deterioration in workers’ fundamental human rights to join or establish a trade union and to bargain collectively.

Of the 148 countries covered, 113 exclude workers from the protection of unions—up from 106 in last year’s report. Eighty-seven per cent of countries violate the right to strike, collective-bargaining rights are infringed in 80 per cent and workers in 50 countries experience physical violence due to their union activities.

Such denial of basic human rights is a major cause of low wages and stagnant or worsening living standards. This at a time when working families are facing enormous pressures from inflation, the impacts of climate change and growing precarity at work.

Laws violated

The failure to uphold international labour standards drives regulatory arbitrage, with multinational companies able to take advantage of lax standards to keep wages down, operate dangerous and unhealthy workplaces and in many cases maintain feudal structures at work. Companies which aim to do better, including by ensuring living wages and decent conditions for their workforce and having constructive relations with unions, are faced with competitive pressures from those that base their business models on exploitation.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

The recent ‘Uber Files’ show the lengths to which legislatures have been compromised, public opinion manipulated and laws and regulations violated and ignored. The company’s approach is that the relationship between worker and employer should be determined solely by the employer, to the detriment of the worker. Uber is not alone in this, with other large companies such as Amazon holding down pay and imposing arduous working conditions by devoting huge resources to stopping workers organising.

The impacts go beyond the workers in those companies themselves: their business practices have a chilling effect on rights elsewhere, which puts other workers at risk. Nor is the public sector immune, with wages falling further behind the cost of living and workers who in many cases kept countries afloat during the early stages of the pandemic being told they must accept austerity, in the name of economic orthodoxy.

ILO obligations              

The crumbling of respect for rights is in large measure due to governments failing to meet their obligations under the standards of the International Labour Organization. These standards are developed through tripartite negotiations at the ILO and when governments ratify them they undertake to ensure that the standards are implemented.

In fact, simply by virtue of being member states of the ILO, governments are subject to its supervision of the extent of compliance with two of the most fundamental standards, convention 87 on freedom of association and convention 98 on the right to organise and collective bargaining—even if they have not ratified them. The ILO’s strength derives in large measure not only from having governments as members but also the involvement in its supervisory processes of representatives of workers and employers.

That strength is however undermined when governments commit to rights and a regulated labour market at the ILO yet refuse to weave these standards into the fabric of the international trade and financial systems. It is ultimately working people who lose out from this contradiction, which weakens the ILO since the exclusion of workers from union membership, by government act or omission, weakens one of the crucial pillars of the tripartite system. Putting ILO standards at the heart of the rules of trade and finance would make a huge difference and help turn back the burgeoning inequality and economic insecurity which characterise the global economy today.

Due diligence

Of course it is not only governments which have a responsibility to act. The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights establish the responsibility of companies to comply with standards and the pillars on which compliance must be based. These require due diligence to identify and prevent the risk of violation, provide grievance procedures and ensure remedy. 

Companies have to carry out due diligence not only in their own direct operations but also other businesses which are part of their supply or value chain. Protection and prevention are essential and access to remedy just as important. In many countries, labour laws are weak, labour inspection is inadequate or effectively non-existent for large parts of the workforce and, even where the systems are in place, penalties for violations are derisory.

Some companies take this seriously of their own volition, with due diligence and remedy built into their operations, but a great many private employers do not. That is why unions, and others, are campaigning for due diligence to be mandated in law.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

A number of countries, primarily in Europe, have heeded the call and begun to legislate for mandatory due diligence. This has not always been done in a way that satisfies all the demands of unions—demands which are based on genuine need—but progress has been made in national jurisdictions.

European directive

At the supranational level, much attention has focused on the idea of a European directive on corporate due diligence, covering environmental, labour and other human-rights standards, on which the European Commission put forward a proposal in February. This would cover corporations with 500 or more employees and a minimum of €150 million net turnover, with lower thresholds set for companies in ‘high impact’ sectors. Small and medium enterprises are excluded but non-European companies that meet the thresholds and generate revenue in Europe would be included.

Recognising the need for a directive, given the failure of voluntary initiatives to deliver, the European Trade Union Confederation has set out clear demands for what should be included in such an instrument:

  • all companies should be covered, including their supply and subcontracting chains;
  • since workers’ rights to trade union membership and other protections are human rights, these should be equally protected as main components;
  • the directive should provide for effective remedies and access to justice for victims/workers, including trade unions;
  • liability must be introduced for cases where companies fail to respect their due-diligence obligations, without prejudice to joint-and-several liability frameworks, and
  • the directive should ensure full involvement of trade unions and workers’ representatives, including European works councils, throughout the whole due-diligence process.

The ETUC describes the commission proposal as an important first step—but a bare minimum.

New social contract

While significant steps forward are being made, and existing standards such as the Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development are having an impact, the rules of the global economy are still stacked against workers. That’s why the ITUC is calling for a new social contract, built on the foundations of decent wages, workers’ rights, social protection, job creation, equality and inclusion. That will be the theme of the ITUC World Congress this November in Melbourne.

The world is equipped with a sound body of international labour standards, set through the ILO and in many cases respected and enforced by governments. But the exclusion of these standards from the rules of trade and finance, and the capacity for irresponsible companies to violate them as part of their business model, must be brought to an end.

Without that, the grim scores on the ITUC Global Rights Index will continue to deteriorate—and working people in every region will still experience inadequate wages, dangerous and unhealthy jobs and increasing precarity in their working lives and those of their dependents.

Sharan Burrow
Sharan Burrow

Sharan Burrow is general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation.

You are here: Home / Economy / How to restore workers’ rights

Most Popular Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse

Most Recent Posts

EU social agenda,social investment,social protection EU social agenda beyond 2024—no time to wasteFrank Vandenbroucke
pension reform,Germany,Lindner Pension reform in Germany—a market solution?Fabian Mushövel and Nicholas Barr
European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
artists,cultural workers Europe’s stars must shine for artists and creativesIsabelle Van de Gejuchte
transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube