Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Will Europe deliver on corporate responsibility?

Isabelle Schömann 22nd February 2022

The EU must enforce mandatory due diligence on corporations and their supply chains and involve workers in its strategy.

supply chains,mandatory due diligence,human rights,workers' rights
This shouldn’t be the source of your chocolate—a child labourer harvesting cocoa in Ghana (Charles William Adofo / shutterstock.com)

Last June, the European Commission was due to unveil a proposal obliging businesses to ensure human rights throughout their operations and global supply chains. Yet despite sustained pressure from the European Trade Union Confederation, nothing came forward. The draft directive on human-rights due diligence and sustainable corporate governance is 237 days late—but, at last, the commission is due to publish a proposal tomorrow.

Why should due diligence be so difficult for the EU when member states are already taking action? Back in 2017, France passed a law on a corporate duty of vigilance and the issue was included in the coalition agreement among the German government partners in December last year. Action by these two major powers should send a clear signal to the commission.

In April 2021, the Belgian parliament voted in favour of a law on due diligence. In December the Dutch government announced that it would introduce national legislation—due to the ‘disappointing’ delay at EU level. Other EU countries, including Finland and Denmark, have also committed to due-diligence rules. The political momentum is there and must translate into tough EU-wide action.

Key demands

A European directive on mandatory human-rights due diligence and responsible business conduct is urgent and must be robust. The ETUC has set out its key demands.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

The EU law must oblige effective due diligence covering companies’ activities and business relationships, including their entire supply and subcontracting chains. Public oversight should guarantee compliance by business and their suppliers.

Business obligations must cover human rights, including workers’ and trade union rights, as referred to in European and international law. EU values and principles must be the compass.

Trade unions and workers’ representatives, including European works councils, must be fully informed and proactively involved throughout the whole due diligence process, as corporate stakeholders. Workers must be empowered to take action against human-rights violations, providing effective sanctions, remedies and access to justice for victims, including trade unions.

Last but not least, companies must be held accountable for the impacts of their operations if they fail to respect their due-diligence obligations, regardless of joint and several liability frameworks where two or more parties are involved.

Profits before lives

Back in January 2020, the ETUC had highlighted the urgency of legislation, given multinational companies’ failure to act responsibly in guaranteeing workers’ rights and protecting the environment. There was the 2013 collapse of the Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh, where workers were manufacturing clothing for major European retailers. There were the reports of children used to harvest cocoa and of items produced by forced labour in China appearing in European supermarkets. Companies continue to put profits before lives when it comes to sourcing cheap goods.

Multinationals operate through complex cross-border subcontracting and supply chains. Voluntary pledges have proved ineffective and binding rules are the only way to ensure they take responsibility for the welfare of workers and their own environmental impact, not only in the European Union but around the world. Research by international human-rights monitors, including the International Labour Organization, the Council of Europe and the International Trade Union Congress (with its Global Rights Index), confirms that violations of workers’ and trade union rights are still on the increase, committed not only by oppressive governments but also by well-known companies.

In December, four members of the European Parliament from different political parties wrote to the commission seeking clarity about the role of its Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB) in delaying the draft legislation. They insisted on the clear public interest in disclosing the reasons behind the RSB’s rejection of an initiative which had garnered almost half a million responses in the course of public consultation.

A month earlier, a group of organisations, including the ETUC, had complained to the European ombudsman of maladministration on the part of the commission, which had apparently disregarded more than 100,000 public submissions missing from the consultation website. The complainants included the Austrian Chamber of Labour, the Austrian Trade Union Federation (ÖGB), the European Coalition for Corporate Justice, Friends of the Earth Europe, SumOfUs and WeMoveEU.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

The ombudsman promised to submit the complaint to the commission. But so far there has been no reaction from the latter quarter, again demonstrating the lack of accountability and reluctance to debate with trade unions and international non-governmental organisations.

Stalling action

In the meantime, some industry lobbies have publicly proclaimed their success in stalling action, raising serious questions about the objectivity of the RSB. The MEPs demanded disclosure of all correspondence and meetings between board members and external stakeholders, reflecting the degree of concern within the European Parliament about the integrity of EU law-making.

What was reported as a ‘big win’ for corporate lobbyists was condemned by the ETUC and by human-rights and environmental INGOs, which revealed in June 2021 how industry lobbyists were working to block legislation or, more insidiously, weaken its impact. European citizens cannot accept that laws are being tweaked and tailored to protect profits at the expense of human lives or to enable climate pollution and corporate corruption.

Every day of delay is one more day when workers’, trade union and other human rights are abused and trampled on. Over 80 per cent of citizens across multiple EU countries want strong laws to hold companies liable for human-rights and environmental violations. A YouGov poll in nine member states late last year found 86 per cent of respondents agreed that companies which cause or contribute to human-rights violations and environmental crimes around the world should be rendered legally liable.

Earlier this month, more than 100 companies, investors and business associations called for urgent legislation applying a risk-based approach to the whole value chain. Reputable businesses should welcome a clear framework of rules, to create a level playing-field for all companies operating in Europe.

Strong tools

EU mandatory due-diligence legislation is vital to improve the environmental and human-rights impacts of EU-based corporations across the world and to provide strong tools so victims of abuses can hold them accountable. It is high time to put the interests of people and the planet before profit.

The commission must table an ambitious proposal to make a clear break with current practices of voluntary codes of conduct. It must seize this unique opportunity to position itself in a global context by coming forward with legally-binding rules on human rights, due diligence and corporate accountability—showing that the EU is serious about defending workers’, trade union and broader human and environmental rights.

This column is sponsored by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC).

Isabelle Schömann
Isabelle Schömann

Isabelle Schömann was elected confederal secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation at the 14th congress in Vienna in May 2019. From 2005 to 2016, she was a senior researcher with the European Trade Union Institute in Brussels.

You are here: Home / Politics / Will Europe deliver on corporate responsibility?

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube