Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Making globalisation fair

Reiner Hoffmann 9th March 2020

Enterprises must address—and government more actively demand of them—their observance of human rights.

human rights due diligence
Reiner Hoffmann

Should enterprises be legally required to observe human rights, within their businesses and along their value chains? The German federal government has been searching for an answer to this question for months.

From an ethical point of view, the obligation has always existed: human rights are universal, inalienable and indivisible; they must be observed and protected. The problem is how to translate this moral obligation into concrete corporate action.

This question is also not new. Twenty-one years ago, the then secretary-general of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, used the World Economic Forum in Davos to emphasise to the business elite that the economic possibilities of markets across the globe were intertwined with corporate responsibility to support social and ecological development in the countries concerned.

In 2011, the UN adopted Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. These describe in detail corporate responsibility to observe human rights along global value chains.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Voluntary commitment

Over three years ago, the German government issued the National Action Plan (NAP) on implementation of the principles. This was preceded by an intense two-year process, in which businesses, trade unions and civil society were given the opportunity to contribute their views. Yet the government could only bring itself to formulate one expectation for enterprises as to due diligence on human rights—it amounted to a voluntary commitment.

Even at the time, trade unions doubted whether this would really lead to greater care in observing human rights. These doubts have been clearly confirmed through the monitoring of the NAP: in a representative sample of approximately 400 businesses surveyed, each with more than 500 employees, the government discovered that not even 20 per cent exercised human-rights due diligence.

The grand-coalition agreement describes what should come next: the federal government intends to take legislative action before the end of the current legislative period. In addition, it plans to back an EU-wide regulation if the voluntary commitment of enterprises proves insufficient.

Instead of making a quick start on drafting legislation, however, the government is getting bogged down in a pedantic debate about the method and contents of the survey and is arguing about the expediency of statutory regulations. Political actors at the Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, in particular, still cling to their faith in voluntary commitments.

Statutory regulation

Two federal ministers, from the Christian-democrat and social-democrat parties respectively, however oppose them by taking the coalition agreement seriously. These are the minister for economic co-operation and development, Gerd Müller, and the minister of labour and social affairs, Hubertus Heil. Both are pushing for a statutory regulation—they have good reasons to do so.

To put it plainly, voluntary commitments have failed. If even filling out a survey is too much for enterprises to manage, this begs the question whether those responsible are even aware of the scope of their responsibility. And if corporate responsibility to observe human rights has been on the agenda of socially and ecologically responsible business leadership for 21 years, we should ask why business has not done more in this time.

Two decades are enough to integrate this responsibility into enterprises’ risk management. Those who assert that global value chains are unmanageable should remember that they were created by the enterprises themselves. It can be assumed that, with regard to product quality, all possible risks in supply chains will be examined. Shouldn’t the same apply to the quality of life and working conditions of the people working in them?

Well-publicised disasters

Well-publicised disasters have shown this is not always the case. In 2013, 1,135 people were killed and 2,438 were injured, some of them severely, in the collapse of the Rana Plaza factory building in Bangladesh—the fashion brands whose products were manufactured there should have been well aware of the textile workers’ poor conditions.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Chocolate production is also an industry where many producers violate human rights every day. In west Africa alone, according to the International Labour Organization, approximately two million children harvest cocoa for large chocolate manufacturers under exploitative conditions.

Dam breaches, factory fires and collapses become public knowledge in Germany. But many more human-rights violations go under the radar.

Competitive disadvantage

Though such carelessness is the opposite of diligence, we cannot accuse business on the whole of a careless approach to human rights. While there are still occasional comments from some companies doubting their responsibility, numerous enterprises have been minimising risks of human-rights violations in value chains for a long time.

This approach entails greater effort and thus may be somewhat less profitable. Unfortunately, such enterprises are then at a clear competitive disadvantage, as long as their competitors can commit too few or no resources to protecting human rights effectively.

Müller has attempted, through several initiatives in various sectors, to incentivise enterprises to change course in industries where human rights are particularly at risk. These initiatives, the most prominent being the Textile Partnership, have certainly had respectable results. But most enterprises are still not participating. Only a statutory obligation can ensure that sensible and effective initiatives and partnerships gain momentum and compliant firms need not continue at a competitive disadvantage.

A further reason why many enterprises endorse a supply-chain law is the current climate of legal uncertainty. Businesses which do not know how to observe the rights at issue may currently be safe from punishment but not from other damages. The courts are already an option for claimants to bring civil action against enterprises for their negligence of human rights. The damage to reputation incurred here is usually higher than the financial penalties.

Not binding

To any doubters in the German government, I would recommend reading the report of the advisory consortium responsible for monitoring the NAP. In 2018, this said the NAP was unknown even in large enterprises and it played a secondary role in business practice, because it was not binding. There could be no clearer statement of the need for statutory regulations.

The government should take the calls of reputable enterprises for a due-diligence law seriously and not dismiss them as a public-relations stunt. Of course, businesses will want to advertise using the concept of sustainability in future. And if these promises are backed by sustainable action, there is nothing wrong with such adverts—quite the contrary.

Supported by the chancellor, Angela Merkel, the government provided important new ideas for ensuring fair globalisation as part of the group of the seven most industrialised countries (G7) in 2015 and at the G20 in 2017. This commitment enjoyed broad international approval and was supported actively by trade unions. It should be continued under the pending German EU presidency.

Germany could make an important contribution by enforcing binding rules—judiciously combined with initiatives by non-governmental organisations—in particular as these affect employees along global value chains. That contribution would in itself be an example of fair globalisation.

Reiner Hoffmann
Reiner Hoffmann

Reiner Hoffmann is chair of the Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (DGB).

You are here: Home / Politics / Making globalisation fair

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube