Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Making women with disabilities visible

Marine Uldry and Pirkko Mahlmäki 2nd December 2022

Unemployed, underpaid, excluded—women with disabilities remain invisible in social policies related to employment.

women with disabilities,intersectional,intersectionality,gender,disability
Only application of a gender lens brings women with disabilities into focus (ALPA PROD / shutterstock.com)

Women with disabilities constitute 25.9 per cent of all women in the European Union and over 55 per cent of all persons with disabilities. There are thus more than 50 million women with disabilities in Europe, without counting those segregated in institutions (who are not even included in the statistics). Despite comprising a majority of persons with disabilities, however, European social policy does not often consider women with disabilities specifically, even though they endure lower employment and higher poverty.

European Commission data show that only 51.3 per cent of people with disabilities are employed, compared with 75.6 per cent of people without disabilities. This varies widely not only across EU member states but also by gender. Yet the data collected by the commission do not provide specific information on the employment of women with disabilities.

Clear trend

A clear trend however emerges from data gathered by the European Institute on Gender Equality. This shows that only 20 per cent of women with disabilities are in full-time employment, versus 28 per cent for men with disabilities and 48 per cent for women without disabilities. They also have very low mean monthly earnings (on Eurostat’s purchasing power standard) of 1,931, compared with 2,064 for women without disabilities and 2,504 for men with disabilities.

Such disparities exist all over Europe. In 2020, research found significant gender disparity in the Spanish labour market, for example, with almost 64 per cent of employees with disabilities being men.

All persons with disabilities face structural discrimination in securing work. Discrimination may include refusal of ‘reasonable accommodation’ by the employer, inaccessible workplaces (and the digital and physical environment around them), stigma and discrimination. These same factors are present in education, leading to lower educational attainment. Persons with disabilities are often thus excluded from the open labour market, ending up in informal or alternative structures, including sheltered workshops with salaries below the minimum wage or unpaid work.

Putting women and men with disabilities in the same box however fails to address the additional gender bias women with disabilities face in employment. Too often, women with disabilities are seen as abstract ‘persons’—not women. Men are meanwhile considered the norm and gender issues, such as responsibilities around care work or sexual harassment, are not considered in disability policies. So in addition to the barriers encountered by all persons with disabilities, women with disabilities face the weight of patriarchy, sexism and gender-based discrimination.

Such discrimination keeping women out of employment or in marginalised situations takes the form of gender bias in taxation systems, lower access to continuous education and training, unequal pay for equal work, in work-poverty, unequal caring responsibilities and inadequate (or non-existent) measures to support women as carers, as well as issues related to violence and harassment.

EU data show that 61 per cent of women with disabilities have experience of sexual harassment since the age of 15 (compared with 54 per cent of women without disabilities). In-work harassment is unlikely to be an exception. In fact, employers may be more likely to accept inappropriate behaviour towards women with disabilities than abled-bodied women—as revealed by testimony in a UN Women paper published in 2020. To add insult to injury, women with disabilities are often forbidden to speak up and may even leave their jobs because of such abuses.

The double-glazed ceiling

Breaking the glass ceiling is an objective for women in all their diversity. But in the case of women with disabilities the ceiling is double-glazed.

Disability-specific policies are important in addressing employment inequalities. They are necessary to deal with many issues, such as disability-based discrimination, accessibility and reasonable accommodation. When these policies are unmindful of gender, however, they are more beneficial to men with disabilities—55 per cent of persons with disabilities (the women) are left behind.

For example, a 2016 report from the independent French défenseur des droits (defender of rights) highlighted that training courses proposed to women with disabilities, meant to advance their careers, were not adapted to their disability or family life. Furthermore, they often focused on sectors of activity where few women were already present. It also revealed that women with disabilities were less likely than men with disabilities to be referred by disability services to professional rehabilitation centres.

This is why all proposed measures, including those related to accessibility, need to be scrutinised with a gender lens. For instance, beyond the accessibility of the workplace, accessibility of childcare and flexibility of schedule, as a form of reasonable accommodation, are required to improve the employment of women with disabilities. Quota systems should also include a gender perspective.

Unfortunately, the employment package for persons with disabilities released by the commission in September does not yet include any mention of, or actions targeting, women with disabilities. The EU Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025 meanwhile includes women with disabilities only vis-à-vis issues related to violence against women—they are invisible in the sections addressing employment and on closing the gender gap in the labour market.

Falling through the cracks

Women are, to all intents and purposes, falling through the cracks of policies that do not consider the intersections among axes of discrimination. To ensure greater consideration of women with disabilities in social policies, the European Disability Forum has published a paper on the employment of women with disabilities.

Especially urgent is the inclusion of women with disabilities in measures related to employment developed under the EU disability and gender strategies—in particular the package to improve labour-market outcomes for persons with disabilities. Proper monitoring would also be vital to fill the data deficits, for example by including indicators on employment of women with disabilities in the Social Scoreboard and specific recommendations in country reports.

But consideration of gender goes behind that. It entails rethinking the way we design and implement policies from a holistic perspective. It means providing an inclusive education system free from stereotypes. It requires ensuring that girls and women with disabilities can choose their work in light of their desires and talents, not constrained by inaccessibility or bias.

Also critical is recogntion that women with disabilities are often (more often than men) carers for children and relatives. Redistributing care responsibilities between genders and recognising care as work are thus fundamental. Finally, it is also necessary to address violence and harassment at work—recognising that women with disabilities are women too and listening to, and trusting, their voices.

Advancement and empowerment

More than a decade ago the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities entered into force in the EU and, since 2018, all member states have been committed to upholding the rights it contains. Under article 6, they have the responsibility to take measures to ensure the full advancement and empowerment of women with disabilities.   

The EU has shown commitment to addressing disability and women’s rights and intersectional discrimination through various strategies and policy proposals. Yet while intersectionality has become a trendy word, actions are lacking.

The data do not lie. Women with disabilities are still invisible.

Marine Uldry 1
Marine Uldry

Marine Uldry co-ordinates human-rights policy and is in charge of gender policy at the European Disability Forum. She worked at the International Disability Alliance and at the Delegation of the European Union to the United Nations. She was also a research assistant for the chair of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities monitoring the UN convention.

Pirkko Mahlmaki
Pirkko Mahlmäki

Pirkko Mahlmäki is chair of the women’s committee and a member of the executive of the European Disability Forum, which she represents at the European Women’s Lobby. She was for two decades secretary general of the Finnish Disability Forum.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983467f bb39 37d5862ca0d5 0 Ending Britain’s “Brief Encounter” with BrexitStefan Stern
u421983485 2 The Future of American Soft PowerJoseph S. Nye
u4219834676d582029 038f 486a 8c2b fe32db91c9b0 2 Trump Can’t Kill the Boom: Why the US Economy Will Roar Despite HimNouriel Roubini
u42198346fb0de2b847 0 How the Billionaire Boom Is Fueling Inequality—and Threatening DemocracyFernanda Balata and Sebastian Mang
u421983441e313714135 0 Why Europe Needs Its Own AI InfrastructureDiane Coyle

Most Popular Articles

startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer
u421983467 2a24 4c75 9482 03c99ea44770 3 Trump’s Trade War Tears North America Apart – Could Canada and Mexico Turn to Europe?Malcolm Fairbrother
u4219834676e2a479 85e9 435a bf3f 59c90bfe6225 3 Why Good Business Leaders Tune Out the Trump Noise and Stay FocusedStefan Stern
u42198346 4ba7 b898 27a9d72779f7 1 Confronting the Pandemic’s Toxic Political LegacyJan-Werner Müller
u4219834676574c9 df78 4d38 939b 929d7aea0c20 2 The End of Progess? The Dire Consequences of Trump’s ReturnJoseph Stiglitz

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Spring issue of The Progressive Post is out!


Since President Trump’s inauguration, the US – hitherto the cornerstone of Western security – is destabilising the world order it helped to build. The US security umbrella is apparently closing on Europe, Ukraine finds itself less and less protected, and the traditional defender of free trade is now shutting the door to foreign goods, sending stock markets on a rollercoaster. How will the European Union respond to this dramatic landscape change? .


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss European defence strategies, assess how the US president's recent announcements will impact international trade and explore the risks  and opportunities that algorithms pose for workers.


READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

KU Leuven advertisement

The Politics of Unpaid Work

This new book published by Oxford University Press presents the findings of the multiannual ERC research project “Researching Precariousness Across the Paid/Unpaid Work Continuum”,
led by Valeria Pulignano (KU Leuven), which are very important for the prospects of a more equal Europe.

Unpaid labour is no longer limited to the home or volunteer work. It infiltrates paid jobs, eroding rights and deepening inequality. From freelancers’ extra hours to care workers’ unpaid duties, it sustains precarity and fuels inequity. This book exposes the hidden forces behind unpaid labour and calls for systemic change to confront this pressing issue.

DOWNLOAD HERE FOR FREE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

What kind of impact is artificial intelligence (AI) having, or likely to have, on the way we work and the conditions we work under? Discover the latest issue of HesaMag, the ETUI’s health and safety magazine, which considers this question from many angles.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
How are minimum wage levels changing in Europe?

In a new Eurofound Talks podcast episode, host Mary McCaughey speaks with Eurofound expert Carlos Vacas Soriano about recent changes to minimum wages in Europe and their implications.

Listeners can delve into the intricacies of Europe's minimum wage dynamics and the driving factors behind these shifts. The conversation also highlights the broader effects of minimum wage changes on income inequality and gender equality.

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641