Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Solidarity in time of war

Frank Hoffer 28th February 2022

The Russian invasion of Ukraine demands a multi-pronged, enduring European response sending a very clear signal to the Kremlin.

Ukraine,sanctions,solidarity
Europe’s response needs a broad agenda (pixelkiez/shutterstock.com)

‘We are alone to defend our country. Who will fight with us now? To be honest, I don’t see anyone.’ That’s how the president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, expressed his country’s desperate situation in a video message to his compatriots on Friday.

Ukrainians are fighting Russian aggression with the courage of desperation. With the threat of using nuclear weapons, the Russian federation president, Vladimir Putin, is trying to deter the rest of the world from supporting Ukraine. Given Putin’s recklessness, his words must be taken at face value. And as no one—except Putin—wants to risk the escalation to a nuclear war, the massively outgunned Ukrainians fight on their own.

Putin told the world via television that he wants to resurrect the Russian empire. Ukraine is for him only part of a much bigger game. He will not stop until he is stopped. Ukraine needs international solidarity and help.

Answers needed

In this context, further debate (as in Germany) between those who expressed an accommodative understanding of Russian security concerns and supporters of the expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization unmindful of them is pointless. What is needed, here and now, are answers to a dictator who robs and oppresses his own people, poisons and murders political opponents, invades Ukraine and threatens the world with a nuclear inferno.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Western political mistakes may have contributed to today’s disaster but ultimate blame lies solely with Putin. There is no justification for this war. The talk of ‘genocide’ in the Donbass and ‘neo-Nazis’ in Kyiv is pure Russian propaganda. As in many other European countries, there is an extreme right in Ukraine, but—unlike in Germany, Sweden or France—none of the radical-right parties could get past the 5 per cent threshold during the last parliamentary election.

The attempts by Germany and France to find a diplomatic solution via the ‘Normandy format’ proved as futile as the tough stance of the United States in stopping Putin. With the Russian rejection of mediation, the German reasoning against arms supply was no longer valid. The  chancellor, Olaf Scholz, explained to a special sitting of the Bundestag yesterday why his government had decided to provide arms to Ukraine.

Horrible as the atrocities of any war are, every day of successful resistance is a defeat for Putin, who needs a Blitzsieg. The world sees the blood of civilian casualties on his hands. Albeit official media coverage is heavily censored in Russia, images of fallen soldiers will reach Russian living rooms and families through ‘social media’ and Telegram channels.

Tough sanctions

Putin has prepared thoroughly for this war and no economic sanctions, no matter how harsh, will hold up the advance of the Russian army. Neither expulsion from the SWIFT financial-transactions system, nor confiscation of oligarch assets nor refusal to buy Russian oil or gas will stop Putin in the short term.

This does not mean rejecting tough sanctions but being clear that these measures will have to be maintained for a long time. Their full effect will unfold not in the next few weeks but in the months and years to come. Economically it is about drying up Russian export revenues. It is about becoming less dependent on Russian raw materials, excluding Russia from modern technologies and denying access to international financial markets.

Whether individual measures are taken today, tomorrow or in the very near future is not decisive. What is is that there be agreement on a comprehensive package of sanctions, implemented strategically and without loopholes, so that the difference between the cost to NATO member states and the damage to Russia is maximised. At the same time, Europe should communicate to the Russian population that these measures are directed against the regime, not Russia itself. Russia has a world to win by getting rid of Putin.

Practical and symbolic

Other steps can however have a quicker effect, practically and symbolically. All members of the government, members of parliament, oligarchs, senior military officers and senior state officials should be denied visas, with immediate effect. Children or close relatives of these persons enduringly in European countries, for study or other purposes, should be expelled. Russian super-rich should be deprived of their residence status and Russian private assets above €100,000 frozen.

Russia should be disinvited from international sporting and cultural events, congresses, trade fairs and so on—yesterday the International Judo Federation suspended Putin as its honorary president and ambassador. At the same time, everything should be done to support the courageous Russian people on the streets in Moscow, St Petersburg and other cities and the many hundreds of journalist and academics who have spoken out against this war.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

In addition to arms deliveries, there is a need for economic aid, medical supplies and basic goods for the Ulrainian population. Solidarity demonstrations are important to show Ukrainians every day that the world is on their side. The massive turnout at yesterday’s demonstration in Berlin was a powerful show of empathy and support. The speeches must be backed up with practical help and a willingness to accept some economic privations for the defence of Ukraine.

Open borders

In addition, the European Union’s borders must be opened for those who flee from the war. The neighbouring states must be given comprehensive help in this task by the EU and all member states must stand in solidarity and take in refugees. This is not only a state but also a social responsibility. In Germany in 2015 millions of people welcomed refugees from Syria, with unprecedented empathy and willingness to help. Today, the Ukrainian people need this support from governments and societies at large.

Every opportunity for negotiation should of course be taken to resolve the conflict. The longing for a détente policy, in the spirit of the Ostpolitik of the former chancellor Willy Brandt, is especially deeply rooted in Germany—but it takes two to tango. Meaningful talks are impossible without Russia’s genuine willingness to seek a peaceful solution rather than to dictate by war. Putin clearly does not show such willingness as yet.

In the short term, only a Ukrainian miracle on the battlefield can bring him to the negotiating table. But in support of Ukraine the west must make it clear to Putin that even a military victory would be Pyrrhic. It has to use political isolation, economic sanctions and military deterrence to send an unwavering message: if Russia does not stop the war and respect Ukrainian sovereignty, its future will be as an economically stagnant global pariah.

Frank Hoffer
Frank Hoffer

Frank Hoffer is non-executive director of the Global Labour University Online Academy.

You are here: Home / Politics / Solidarity in time of war

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube