Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Universities Under Siege: A Global Reckoning for Higher Education

Manuel Muñiz 18th June 2025

Governments worldwide are dramatically reshaping higher education, challenging long-held models and academic autonomy.

u421983462 041df6feef0a 3

The landscape of higher education is undergoing immense transformation, with governments globally implementing significant policy changes that often face strong resistance from academic institutions themselves. This shift is arguably most pronounced in the United States, where the Trump administration has introduced policies that question the university model developed since the Second World War.

In early 2025, the US government significantly cut federal research grants and contracts by over $11 billion. This move suspended grant funding and capped indirect cost support at 15 percent of a grant’s value, severely hampering the research capacity of many higher education institutions. Additionally, the administration proposed a tiered tax regime on university endowment income, potentially increasing rates up to 21 percent for wealthier institutions, a notable change from the previous flat rate of 1.4 percent. If implemented, these changes would reduce funds available for scholarships, operations, and innovation. The most high-profile action was the revocation of Harvard University’s SEVP certification in May 2025, which temporarily barred it from enrolling international students. Although a federal court stayed the decision, it signals a broader policy trend against international student mobility.

Many other countries are also altering their university policies, with a clear emerging trend being the introduction of barriers to international student mobility. Restrictive measures have been deployed by governments in Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and Canada. In 2023, the Dutch government announced plans to reduce the number of English-taught programmes at public universities and to prioritise Dutch and EU students in admissions. In July 2024, Australia increased international student visa fees from $710 to $1,600 and announced a cap of 270,000 tertiary student places. Canada followed suit with a cap on student permits and new restrictions on work eligibility. Meanwhile, the UK banned most students from bringing dependants as of January 2024, contributing to a 6.2 percent decline in granted visas. Despite national variations, the trajectory is clear: it is becoming harder for students to cross borders to pursue their studies.

Academic autonomy is also being challenged through direct political interventions and legislative measures aimed at controlling academic content and governance structures. In several countries, governments have taken steps to reduce academic freedom, such as Hungary’s 2018 reorganisation of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the forced relocation of Central European University. In the United States, recent state-level legislation has sought to restrict teaching on certain topics, particularly in public universities. Similar patterns are evident in India and Turkey, where political pressure has increasingly shaped university appointments and curricula.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



While it is challenging to weave a single thread across all these policies, many of which respond to unique national circumstances, a common feature connects developments in higher education to broader policy domains such as trade and immigration. We are witnessing the fracturing of the international higher education landscape. Countries are moving towards a model that fosters less mobility, downplays the value of plurality in the classroom, and encourages institutions to define their societal contributions in narrower, nationally defined terms. In this sense, the growing questioning of globalisation and, more broadly, of interdependence, has now reached academia.

This process appears to contradict the aspirations of many young people. For example, the QS International Student Survey 2023 found that 87 percent of prospective students viewed international study as essential to personal growth and career success. This also aligns with the needs of employers; a 2021 Erasmus+ Impact Study found that two-thirds of employers valued international experience as a key asset when hiring. Education has also become a significant export: in the United States alone, higher education was projected to generate over $90 billion annually by 2025. Restricting international student flows, therefore, undermines institutional excellence and effectiveness.

Furthermore, actions that harm academic institutions, their budgets, or their autonomy appear to be highly destructive. Universities have long provided substantial value to society. They are central to knowledge production – over 60 percent of all basic research in the US, for instance, is conducted in higher education institutions. Economically, universities contribute significantly to local and national growth. The Association of American Universities reports that its member institutions alone generated over $289 billion in economic activity in 2021. The European University Association has highlighted that for every €1 invested in higher education, up to €4 is returned in broader economic benefits. Moreover, universities serve as engines of social mobility, cultural innovation, and democratic participation.

So, why are these invasive and revisionist policies being deployed? For centuries, universities have largely withstood existential threats due to their legitimacy in the eyes of key stakeholders. However, what once protected them from political interference now seems less certain. Today, their autonomy is challenged by a waning belief among large segments of society in their relevance and value. Legitimacy – not endowment size or legal might – must be the foundation of institutional resilience.

Institutions draw on numerous sources of legitimacy, with four arguably being particularly important. The first is holding widely shared and consistent values. Yet, universities are being attacked for perceived double standards – for defending freedom of speech for some but not for others, for example. A second source of legitimacy is procedural, emanating from institutions being run with justice and uniformity in the application of rules and norms. Here too, universities face challenges, being depicted as taking sides or deploying biased admissions criteria, particularly those favouring the privileged. A third source of legitimacy is output. Attending university and obtaining a degree should bring eminently positive returns. However, today’s economy is proving less generous for university graduates. The erosion of the salary economy, with income increasingly accruing to capital owners, does not bode well for institutions traditionally dedicated to training highly qualified labour income earners. Furthermore, the cost of university has risen markedly in many places, making the value-for-money equation of a university degree less attractive. Lastly, a final source of institutional legitimacy is input: that institutions are part of broader communities that have a say – even if small – in their governance. This is once more being challenged, with universities being depicted as elitist, aloof, detached from the societies in which they are embedded, and dedicated to perpetuating social and economic elites.

What can universities do to better address this new environment? First and foremost, there needs to be a recommitment to the values upon which academic institutions have been built over centuries. Most important among these are critical thinking and intellectual pluralism. Indeed, universities must be spaces where individuals learn how to think, not what to think. This implies they should not be built as safe intellectual spaces, but rather as highly crowded and diverse forums where varied points of view are welcomed.

Second, universities must develop deep connections with the world of practice. In an exponentially changing environment, there is a need for applied institutions that bridge the worlds of knowledge and practice. This also means being deeply connected to technology and embedding it in all they do. Hence, agility and a willingness to change will be key features of successful universities in the twenty-first century.

Third and lastly, universities must do a significantly better job of communicating the value they bring to their students and the societies where they operate. This must begin with adjustments to university leadership, which needs to be fully aware of the battle of ideas and perceptions in which their institutions are engaged. Universities should not become political actors, but they should understand they are being judged on their merits and should therefore be willing and ready to delineate their value at every opportunity.

As in other policy areas, a great deal of uncertainty has now arrived in higher education. We are entering a world of high regulatory and political risk. Universities remain the cornerstone of our knowledge economies and our societies, writ large. Protecting them means more than preserving old traditions – it means renewing the public’s understanding of their purpose and worth. In this moment of disruption, universities must speak more clearly and act more decisively.

This is a joint column with IPS Journal

Manuel Muniz
Manuel Muñiz

Manuel Muniz is Provost of IE University and a Professor of Practice of International Relations.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u421983467 4b96 a2b4 d663613bf43e 0 A Fair Future?  How Equality Will Define Europe’s Next ChapterKate Pickett
u42198346742 445d 82f2 d4ae7bb125be 2 A Progressive Industrial Policy for the Global South: A Latin American PerspectiveJosé Miguel Ahumada and Fernando Sossdorf
u421983467978 41d4 a838 75d30eaaf6d8 3 Europe’s Green Transition: A Fund Under PressureValeria Cirillo, Marialuisa Divella, Lidia Greco and Eustachio Ferrulli
u4219834673aaf4 2 Housing Crisis Threatens to Fracture Central and Eastern EuropeJeffrey Sommers, Daniel Pop and Cosmin Marian

Most Popular Articles

u4219834676 bcba 6b2b3e733ce2 1 The End of an Era: What’s Next After Globalisation?Apostolos Thomadakis
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato
09d21a9 The Future of Social Democracy: How the German SPD can Win AgainHenning Meyer
u421983462 041df6feef0a 3 Universities Under Siege: A Global Reckoning for Higher EducationManuel Muñiz

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp