Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Asylum: the EU’s misplaced moral compass

Enzo Rossi 20th February 2023

The measures taken by the EU on asylum should be guided by a lawful and sincere humanitarianism.

asylum,third countries
Pawns in a bigger game: people on the move outside the UN Refugee Agency in Tripoli, their access to Europe hindered by the EU-Libya deal (Hussein Eddeb / shutterstock.com)

In the wake of the ‘refugee crisis’ of 2015-16, the management of the Common European Asylum System entered a second stage. While earlier the European Commission had sought to resolve conflicts among member states—mainly over the relocation and secondary movements of refugees—in this second stage the focus has been on curbing the total number of arrivals in Europe and addressing the issue of returns.

‘Outsourcing’ agreements with third countries have become pivotal features of these new policies. In this perspective, a lower number of asylum-seekers arriving in Europe could ease frictions among states and strengthen the cohesion of European construction. To this end a number of initiatives and programmes have been launched, most notably the Migration Partnership Framework (MPF) endorsed in mid-2016 by the European Council.

Discouraging departures

The MPF urges third countries to collaborate in discouraging departures, having effective exit controls and halting new arrivals into the EU from their territory. Legal pathways are also envisaged to help those entitled to enter Europe through safe channels. In the long term, the main aim is ostensibly to address the root causes of irregular migration by supporting the economic, social and political development of third countries.

The 2016 agreement with Turkey and the Memorandum of Understanding with Libya the following year are well-known precedents. But similar agreements have been undertaken with Albania, Afghanistan, Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco and Senegal, among others.

The official premises of these actions are noble, including saving lives in the desert and at sea and dismantling networks of people-smugglers. Scrutinising the details of implementation however raises a number of concerns. First, the whole process of externalisation has numerous inconsistencies with the rules contained in the directives on the management of asylum and the principles of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights.

Next, homing in on the legitimacy of third-country border controls, these are equivalent to a pushback, infringing the core principle of non-refoulement in the Refugee Convention of 1951. This is according to influential legal interpretations: the United Nations high commissioner for refugees, the UN Human Rights Committee monitoring the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (article 5) and the European Court of Human Rights (three case-law instances).



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



Also at issue is the principle of non-discrimination, contained in the Geneva convention and articles articles 18, 21 and 55 of the EU charter. This would be infringed by, among other things, insufficient transparency as to the selection in third countries of individuals given access to legal pathways.

‘Confidential’ arrangements

Apart from these questionable legal grounds, general perplexities arise as to how these agreements have been concluded. Defending a case taken by a Pakistani asylum-seeker who had found himself on Lesbos, the European Council denied that they had been made on behalf of the union—for which a procedure is set out, including the role of the European Parliament, in article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Rather, they were purportedly the result of agreements between individual member states and third countries. In 2017 the Court of Justice of the EU supported the European Council, reaffirming the capability of member states to represent the union in relations with third countries.

To this a Council of the EU ‘non-paper’ of April 2022 adduced a substantial innovation: the union’s delegations abroad were encouraged to give priority to secret readmission ‘arrangements’. It said that this represented ‘an alternative conducive to swift results for third countries with which there was an urgent need to improve cooperation’ (emphasis in original), with the ‘possibility to keep the arrangement confidential’. This would abandon the principle of ‘sincere cooperation’ among the EU institutions, stipulated in article 13(2) of the Treaty on European Union, since the parliament is completely left out.

Financial support under the MPF is ‘conditional’ on the co-operation of third countries in the reduction of migration flows. The impact on the human rights of those affected will thus not be disclosed with due transparency—corresponding to the political need not to stimulate harsh criticism of such a departure from the humanitarian principles in the founding texts of the union.

Image tarnished

These developments have delicate, if not serious, repercussions. The EU’s image has been tarnished, at home and abroad, by adopting arrangements which clash with its underpinning humanitarian principles. In essence the council has renounced the requirements of transparency, public scrutiny and accountability in the Lisbon treaty, which sought to ‘constitutionalise’ the union in the wake of the failed project to draft a European constitution as such.

Even though article 218 of the TFEU sets a threshold on the centrality of the EU institutions—essential if the rise of nationalisms in Europe is not to be exacerbated—the MPF and related devices exacerbate the situation by giving states the ability to make confidential, undisclosed agreements. As studies on migration suggest, the EU seems to be moving towards ‘soft law’ approaches, foregoing the rule of law and the hard-law construction that could strengthen European political integration.

Enzo Rossi
Enzo Rossi

Enzo Rossi is professor of economics and regulation of migration at the University of Rome Tor Vergata.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato
u42198346ec 111f 473a 80ad b5d0688fffe9 1 A Transatlantic Reckoning: Why Europe Needs a New Pact Beyond Defence SpendingChristophe Sente
u4219834671f 3 Trade Unions Resist EU Bid to Weaken Corporate Sustainability LawsSocial Europe
u421983467 9c73 b24a0b674750 1 The West’s Defence Now Depends on Trump’s Mood SwingsStefan Stern
u4219834674735ecb6fd43 0 The Dark Side Of The Boom In Last-Mile LogisticsSilvia Borelli

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp