Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

The European Union at war

Jan Zielonka 20th February 2023

How can a civilian power such as the EU, Jan Zielonka asks, contend with uncivilised behaviour?

war,European Union
A memorial to the siege of Sarajevo: at the last ‘hour of Europe’, days, weeks, months and years passed (Julian Nyča, CC BY-SA 3.0)

The president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, visited Brussels on February 9th, with the first anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of his country looming. He was warmly welcomed by top European Union officials, who confirmed that Ukraine belonged in Europe.

It was not however by chance that Zelenskyy had visited Washington and London first. While the EU’s overall assistance to Ukraine matches that of the United States, the latter has provided far more arms—and arms are what Ukraine needs most at present.

The EU is not a military actor but rather prides itself on preventing conflicts by creating an economic and legal environment conducive to peace. It also has a formidable record of postwar reconstruction, as witnessed in the Balkans. Yet the EU was unable to prevent the Russian invasion and a defeated Ukraine would be ‘reconstructed’ by Russia. No wonder Zelenskyy has urged the EU to act more quickly and boldly.

Existential questions

This war is not just located on the EU’s borders, affecting the energy bills of Europe’s citizens: Russia’s aggression is a response to Ukraine getting ever closer to Europe. Let us not forget that the first Russian invasion, in 2014, was prompted by the flight of Ukraine’s then pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych, following mass protests triggered by his last-minute refusal—on Moscow’s orders—to sign the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

The EU is unavoidably entangled in this war and it cannot hide behind Uncle Sam. As Heidi Mauer and colleagues have argued, Europe is bound by a ‘collective responsibility to act’ when faced with the Russian aggression. But is it rising to the occasion?

Wolfgang Streeck is not the only European intellectual to offer a negative answer: ‘As Realpolitik raised its ugly head, the EU turned into an auxiliary organization of NATO, charged among other things with devising sanctions against Russia which mostly backfired.’ Imposing sanctions was the least the EU could do in response to an illegal and brutal invasion, but sanctions alone cannot determine the course of these events on the EU’s eastern border.

The problem is that this war, like the ones in former Yugoslavia, has raised existential questions which pragmatic—or, if you wish, short-sighted—European politicians would prefer to avoid. Where are Europe’s borders? Is the US a sui generis power in Europe? Can a civilian power such as the EU survive in an uncivilised political environment? Should Europe’s economic interests prevail over legal and moral norms? Who leads Europe when wars break out?

As long as the EU lacks convincing answers to these fundamental questions, it will remain lame when bombs start to explode.

Facts on the ground

The EU’s borders have been in flux for all its history. Twenty-two states joined the original six members of the European Communities in stages, after adopting a wide body of European laws and regulations. (One has now left.)

Ukraine is far from meeting these legal conditions but, as the president of the European Commission wrote on Twitter, ‘Ukrainians are ready to die for the European perspective. We want them to live with us the European dream.’

This dream does not yet amount to EU membership, but millions of Ukrainian refugees within the EU’s borders amount to a kind of enlargement by default. The EU’s contribution to the postwar reconstruction of Ukraine would also make the country part of the EU, albeit de facto rather than de jure for some time. Is the EU ready to recognise facts on the ground and welcome Ukraine on purely strategic grounds?

The war in Ukraine has confirmed that the US indeed has a (virtual) seat at the EU decision-making table. This is not to everybody’s liking, yet without it Europe will not only be more toothless in military terms but also more divided politically.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

America’s commitment to Europe cannot be taken for granted. Donald Trump, were he to return as president, and Xi Jinping, president for life in China, could prompt the US to change its strategic priorities—in Xi’s case perhaps by a decision to invade Taiwan—leaving the EU with no leader able and willing to stand up for the old continent.

Informal leadership

The war has confirmed that Germany is not up to this job: it is divided internally and contested externally. And there are currently too many ‘sovereigntists’ at the EU decision-making table to allow any meaningful transfer of power to Brussels.

Yet in the early months of the war Mario Draghi—the previous president of the European Central Bank who became Italy’s prior prime minister—showed that informal leadership of the seemingly unruly European club was possible. Leadership is about not just personal charisma but also, if not principally, the ability to formulate a common political stance reflecting European values. How to bridge the gap between those Europeans who look at Ukrainians as the heroic guardians of Europe’s security and those who see instead only fanatical nationalists challenging Russia’s legitimate security concerns?

Equally difficult would be the reconciliation of economic interests with legal and moral positions. Following the illegal annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, the EU did not curb its trade with Moscow and policies aimed at reducing Europe’s dependence on Russian oil and gas were pursued half-heartedly until last year. Even now the EU spends more money on imports from Russia than on aid to Ukraine.

I do not side with those who blame German trade links with Russia for the current predicament. But ‘business as usual’ with those who commit international crimes is not just immoral—it is, in the long run, suicidal.

A European army?

Does the war in Ukraine give impetus to the creation of a European army? After the wars of the Yugoslav succession, the EU decided to create a rapid-reaction force amounting to 60,000 soldiers but this has never materialised. Since the United Kingdom’s departure the prospect of a meaningful European army has looked even dimmer. Although after the Russian invasion of Ukraine several member states—Germany and Poland most notably— decided to beef up their defence budgets, it is far from certain that they will match British military capabilities any time soon.

The EU could however do much more to boost the joint procurement of arms, if not joint arms production. This could be accomplished by enlarging the tasks and budget of the European Defence Agency. It can also significantly increase the European Peace Facility budget, which pays for the arms sent to Ukraine by member states and could possibly support future peace-enforcing military missions.

Those who complain about American hegemony in Europe should provide credible alternatives for fending off military threats. Without tangible commitments to security, the EU will not be taken seriously by Russia or America, or even Iran, Syria and Turkey.

The EU will never be a traditional military actor but Europe’s security is not only about the number of soldiers under the European flag. It is also about security infrastructure, including sectors such as intelligence, logistics, communications and energy—all areas where common European policies can be strengthened. Above all, security requires a sense of direction and leadership, responding to Europe’s collective will.

The hour of Europe

‘This is the hour of Europe,’ proclaimed Jacques Poos, one of the three European Community foreign ministers who flew to Yugoslavia soon after war had started in 1991. Unfortunately, Europe’s ambitious aspirations were not followed by adequate actions at the time.

History is shaped by drastic events such as wars. And it is legitimate to claim that this is again ‘the hour of Europe’. But the horrors of Sarajevo and Mariupol, Srebrenica and Bucha have taught us that reassuring words alone are not sufficient. Bold choices ought to be made quickly, followed by tangible deeds—or else the EU will falter.

This is a joint publication by Social Europe and IPS-Journal

Jan Zielonka
Jan Zielonka

Jan Zielonka is professor of politics and international relations at the University of Venice, Cá Foscari, and at the University of Oxford. His latest book is The Lost Future and How to Reclaim It  (Yale University Press, 2023).

You are here: Home / Politics / The European Union at war

Most Popular Posts

meritocracy The myth of meritocracy and the populist threatLisa Pelling
consultants,consultancies,McKinsey Consultants and the crisis of capitalismMariana Mazzucato and Rosie Collington
France,pension reform What’s driving the social crisis in FranceGuillaume Duval
earthquake,Turkey,Erdogan Turkey-Syria earthquake: scandal of being unpreparedDavid Rothery
European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani

Most Recent Posts

IRA,industrial policy,inflation reduction act The IRA and European industrial policyPaul Sweeney
World Bank,Banga,global south The shakeup the World Bank needsAna Palacio
Moldova,Russia,Ukraine,Georgia Moldova first domino in a Russian plan for escalation?Stefan Wolff
gender segregation,women Separate and unequal: gender segregation at workMary McCaughey
tech,technology,layoffs Will tech layoffs silence or galvanise tech workers?Tom Cassauwers

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Let’s end involuntary unemployment!

What is the best way to fight unemployment? We want to know your opinion, to understand better the potential of an EU-wide permanent programme for direct and guaranteed public-service employment.

In collaboration with Our Global Moment, Fondazione Pietro Nenni and other progressive organisations across Europe, we launched an EU-wide survey on the perception of unemployment and publicly funded jobs, exploring ways to bring innovation in public sector-led job creation.


TAKE THE SURVEY HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

#AskTheExpert webinar—Key ingredients for the future of work: job quality and gender equality

On March 22nd, Eurofound’s head of information and communication, Mary McCaughey, its senior research manager, Agnès Parent-Thirion, and research manager, Jorge Cabrita, explore the findings from the recently published European Working Conditions Telephone Survey (EWCTS) in a live webinar. This survey of more than 70,000 workers in 36 European countries provides a wide-ranging picture of job quality across countries, occupations, sectors and age groups and by gender in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. It confirms persistent gender segregation in sectors, occupations and workplaces, indicating that we are a long way from the goals of equal opportunities for women and men at work and equal access to key decision-making positions in the workplace.

Join the one-hour debate with a live Q&A via an online chat.


REGISTER HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube