Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Gendering labour time—regulating domestic work

Liberty Chee 11th January 2023

Too few countries have ratified the ILO convention on domestic work. Too many don’t see the need.

domestic workers,C189,ILO
Hidden away: domestic workers, often migrant women, may not be included in national accounts or labour laws (topten22photo/shutterstock.com)

As soon as they are old enough to hold a plate or turn a spigot, every person on the planet does some type of housework or another. Man or woman, rich or poor, young or old—everyone takes turns with other household members to do the dishes, make toast or water the plants. Every single human being has had someone change their nappies and comb their hair.

The tasks we carry out in our homes represent work that is absolutely vital in making sure we are all fed, clothed and washed—that we are kept alive—yet they are also taken for granted. Why are there not more conversations about housework? And why are people who do it professionally for a living some of the most precarious, at-risk workers in the world?

Not counted

The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that there are at least 75 million domestic workers worldwide. The number is uncertain, as this work is not normally included in national accounts.

Nevertheless, the sector is estimated to employ as many as one in three women employees in the Arab states, one in five in Latin America and the Caribbean, and one in 12 worldwide. While there are men too who perform domestic work, women are overwhelmingly represented.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Domestic work is also not normally included in labour laws in many national jurisdictions. Many of the norms and entitlements regular employees expect of their employers—receiving a wage or salary at fixed dates, the weekend or days off, having the freedom to come and go at the workplace—thus do not always apply.

There are people who have worked a whole year without receiving a salary. Others are not allowed to leave their employer’s household compound for weeks, even months, at a time. These may be exceptional cases but why do they happen in the 21st century?

Standard-setting instrument

In 2011, the Convention concerning Decent Work for Domestic Workers (C189) was adopted at the ILO’s 100th annual conference. This standard-setting instrument requires that a domestic worker be treated like any other, enjoying the same employment norms as workers in the formal economy.

To date, however, only 35 countries have ratified C189. Latin America and the Caribbean comprise half of the signatories (18), while all of Asia, from Turkey to Japan, has only one (the Philippines). Not coincidentally, Asia also employs about 40 per cent of domestic workers globally.
In the deliberations over C189, delegates from member states, worker groups and employer organisations debated two crucial aspects of domestic work. One was working time.

Domestic work is assumed by many to be so specialised and specific that it is beyond regulation. Should an infant or elderly invalid require attention at 2am, the worker must be on stand-by: the child may need put back to sleep; the elderly person may need help with a toilet. The need for such labour is assumed to be so essential that limits to working time cannot—should not—be set.

The other issue was the household as a place of work. In response to suggestions for labour inspections, concerns were expressed about its ‘inviolability’. Should the state be allowed to intervene in the ‘private’ realm?

Both exceptions to employment norms—the presumptions of an endless and boundless supply of domestic labour and the sanctity of the household—are premised on gendered conceptions of the nature of work and the public-private divide. If cooking, cleaning and caring are so essential that they cannot be regulated by limits to working time, then surely domestic work deserves a premium rather than being so badly paid? And are the people who perform this work treated so poorly in part because they are deemed beyond the reach of the public arena, its laws and its politics?

Changing work norms

Throughout the 20th century, employment meant showing up at the workplace at nine o’clock and punching out at five, give or take. It is easy to forget that over a hundred years ago, people—including children—worked twice as long in factories, powering the industrial age.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

In this century, work norms are again changing. In some ways, they increasingly resemble domestic work. There are more ‘flexible’ hours and work arrangements. Some may be servicing global markets, and may need to be up at 1am to hold meetings with clients or co-workers in other time zones.

During the pandemic, others came to ‘simulate’ the experience of many domestic workers. The household became the workplace and the boundaries between work and life were blurred. Working mothers with young children who could not go to school found that previously distinct aspects of their lives ‘collapsed’ into a single space.

The pandemic clearly demonstrated how modern economies rely on the tenuous balance of the gendered division of labour in the household. If the economy of the previous century was premised on the wage-earner surrendering eight continuous hours of his life for the ‘use’ of a firm or a factory, what form would working time take in this one? And how could caring labour be formalised and incorporated in the economy?

Perhaps some answers can be found in the solutions brought forth by the problems posed by domestic work. These imply transcending the limits of the model of the male wage-earner, with no caring responsibilities—and recognising domestic work as work like any other.

Liberty Chee
Liberty Chee

Dr Liberty Chee is a Filipino migration scholar based in Europe. She is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie fellow at Ca' Foscari University in Venice. Her current research is on the co-production of knowledge about domestic work in the context of the International Labour Organization.

You are here: Home / Economy / Gendering labour time—regulating domestic work

Most Popular Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse

Most Recent Posts

EU social agenda,social investment,social protection EU social agenda beyond 2024—no time to wasteFrank Vandenbroucke
pension reform,Germany,Lindner Pension reform in Germany—a market solution?Fabian Mushövel and Nicholas Barr
European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
artists,cultural workers Europe’s stars must shine for artists and creativesIsabelle Van de Gejuchte
transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube