Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and Qatar

Frank Hoffer 12th January 2023

With the ITUC General Council due to meet tomorrow, answers are urgently needed to the deeper issues raised by this affair.

Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000
Luca Visentini at his election during the Melbourne congress of the International Trade Union Confederation in November (ITUC)

The ITUC General Council held an extraordinary meeting on 21 December and decided to suspend Luca Visentini as ITUC General Secretary until it meets on 11 March when it will give further consideration to this matter. This in no way implies any presumption of guilt.

In a world of instant communication and media pressure to react quickly against any allegations, the International Trade Union Confederation takes its time. Apparently, it needs until March to decide whether there is any reason to doubt the integrity of its newly-elected general secretary.

The rumour mill is meanwhile running overtime and the risks of massive moral damage to the entire labour movement grow by the day. What we know is that Visentini took up to €50,000 in cash from an Italian foundation which apparently received money from Qatari and Moroccan sources.

From public sources we also know the following. On December 9th Visentini was arrested by the Belgian police as part of a corruption investigation and released after 48 hours. In an interview with la Repubblica published four days later, he said he was ‘involved in Qatargate only because I participated in cultural activities of an NGO recognised by the EU Parliament’. He went on:


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

I have provided all the necessary information [to the Belgian prosecutors] and I have also clarified that my positions towards Qatar have never been influenced by anyone. I have said on several occasions that the country had not solved its human rights problems. I condemn any form of corruption.

In another article published on December 15th he emphasised:

I’m innocent … I’m against any form of corruption, I’m not corrupt myself and I have the reputation and the interest of the ITUC as my highest concern.

On December 19th it was reported that Antonio Panzeri, head of the NGO Fight Impunity, had on October 10th handed to Visentini envelopes on which Santa Claus was depicted. The envelopes were stuffed with cash. The conversation was recorded by the police and Panzeri is quoted saying to Visentini: ‘We seem like those guys from Ocean’s Eleven.’

Following this revelation, Visentini admitted he had taken approximately €50,000 in cash from the NGO:

I accepted this donation in cash because of the quality of the donor and its non-profit character. I was not asked, neither did I ask anything in exchange for the money and no conditions whatsoever were set for this donation. This donation was not connected to any attempt of corruption, nor to influence my trade union position on Qatar or on any other issues. I openly reject any possible allegations in this respect as being totally untrue.

Visentini claims that he used the money to ‘reimburse some of the costs incurred to finance my campaign for the ITUC congress’, where he was elected in November. He also claims to have ‘transferred the sum to the ITUC solidarity fund in order to pay for the union’s travel costs’ to Melbourne. Apparently, Visentini personally sponsored the participation of some delegates in the ITUC congress by making a contribution to the fund.

Basic questions

This raises some basic questions. Can an NGO registered as a non-profit organisation give up to €50,000 in cash to an individual without any conditions? Is it acceptable to the ITUC that a third party contributed to the election campaign of its incoming general secretary? What were the ‘cultural activities’ of the foundation in which Visentini participated and to what extent do they touch on ITUC policies or activities? If the foundation money he received was ultimately Qatari money, why was it given? Did the Qatari authorities see a need to invest in the continuity of ITUC policy vis-à-vis Qatar?


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

Currently, it is impossible to get answers to these questions from public sources. For the international labour movement, however, it is of the utmost importance to show that no one except Visentini is in any way involved with Fight Impunity and that neither the ITUC nor any individual trade unionist has received any support from Qatari sources.

The problems for the international labour movement are however not limited to possible individual failings. How can there be so little substantive political debate within the international trade union movement? How could the ITUC celebrate all kinds of successes for the labour movement in Melbourne when in reality it is getting weaker nearly everywhere?

Why has there been so little debate in the labour movement about the fundamental change in the ITUC position on Qatar—from the harshest criticism to praising Qatar to the skies?  How can fundamentally different assessments by the International Labour Organization and the ITUC, on the one hand, and those of labour-friendly campaigning and civil-rights organisations or national labour organisations such as the British Trade Union Congress, on the other, fail to trigger a debate within the ITUC?

Dispelling doubt

Addressing these challenges requires, first and foremost, a leadership whose integrity is beyond doubt. In that sense the ITUC General Council’s decision to have a thorough investigation into the election of Visentini, and any third-party money related to that, can only be the start to addressing the deeper structural and political issues.

In this affair no one is better placed to dispel any doubt about the integrity of the ITUC than its former general secretary, Sharan Burrow. Given the recent developments, her comments on Qatar are now seen, rightly or wrongly, in a different light and the labour movement needs to know whether she was aware that her successor, whom she strongly supported, was using third-party money to win the election.

I therefore asked Burrow (whom I have known for more than 20 years) whether she would be available for a video interview or whether she could respond in writing to some questions. Among others I raised these with her:

  • In an open letter to you the NGO Fair Square accused the ITUC of exaggerating the progress made by Qatar and urged the ITUC ‘to refrain from public statements that misrepresent the situation in Qatar’. The attachments of the letter make detailed reference to the persistence in practice of the kafala system, unresolved health-and-safety issues, the deaths of migrant workers, discrimination against domestic workers etc. Additionally, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the British TUC and BWI have been far more critical about workers’ rights in Qatar than the ITUC. Has the ITUC exaggerated the positive developments in Qatar? Why has the ITUC not insisted on freedom of association as a non-negotiable minimum for migrant workers in Qatar? Can a government that denies these fundamental rights be a ‘valuable friend’ of the ITUC?
  • Did you know that Visentini had received money from ‘Fight Impunity’ to finance his election campaign?
  • Did you know that Visentini made a personal cash contribution to the ITUC solidarity fund?
  • Did you know as general secretary to whom personally at the ITUC Visentini made the cash payment?
  • Who decided how to spend the funds and were the members of the ITUC Executive Board informed about the payments of Visentini to the solidarity fund in the run-up to his election as general secretary?

Burrow responded that she preferred to refrain from any public comment during the process. For the labour movement, however, these questions urgently require answers.

Frank Hoffer
Frank Hoffer

Frank Hoffer is non-executive director of the Global Labour University Online Academy.

You are here: Home / Society / Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and Qatar

Most Popular Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse

Most Recent Posts

European civil war,iron curtain,NATO,Ukraine,Gorbachev The new European civil warGuido Montani
artists,cultural workers Europe’s stars must shine for artists and creativesIsabelle Van de Gejuchte
transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin
central and eastern Europe,unions,recognition Social dialogue in central and eastern EuropeMartin Myant
women soldiers,Ukraine Ukraine war: attitudes changing to women soldiersJennifer Mathers and Anna Kvit

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube