Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Tax abuse—it’s costing the earth

Rosa Pavanelli 16th November 2021

The world’s health workforce could be vaccinated in 36 hours if the pandemic of tax abuse were ended.

health workforce,health workers,nurses,tax abuse,G20
Jess Bezos’ Amazon has made huge windfall gains during the pandemic (lev radin / shutterstock.com)

The recent Pandora Papers leaks came as a kick in the teeth for the world’s frontline workers. While they have been risking their lives to save lives, economic elites and corporations have continued to pillage from public coffers across the world, weakening governments’ capacity to staff and resource the vital public services we rely on to keep safe.

Yet these latest leaks are just a small piece of the puzzle. New research published today by my union federation, Public Services International, together with the Tax Justice Network and the Global Alliance for Tax Justice, shows that offshore tax abuse costs the world almost half a trillion dollars each year.

That’s enough to vaccinate everyone on the planet fully—three times over. By ending tax dodging, we could fund vaccinations for the entire global health workforce in just a day and a half.

Exacerbating inequality

This broken global tax system is exacerbating the vaccine inequality crisis and prolonging the pandemic for everyone. Lower-income countries on average lose a staggering 48 per cent of their public-health budgets to tax abuse each year. Cash-starved health systems, coupled with unequal purchasing power to acquire vaccines sequestered by monopolies, are fuelling the spread of dangerous new variants, leading to more lockdowns and more deaths around the world.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Unfortunately, many of the same countries in the global north which refuse to waive vaccine patents, such as the United Kingdom and Switzerland, are also watering down efforts to tackle tax havens. Their actions aren’t just morally wrong—they are undermining the entire global recovery.

Fanfare surrounded the recent agreement orchestrated by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and accepted by the G20, to curb tax abuse by multinational corporations. This masks the fact that wealthy countries substantially weakened the deal, gifting corporations hundreds of billions of dollars which could otherwise be used to fund public services, climate action and social protections. The deal’s 15 per cent minimum tax rate for the world’s richest corporations is a slap in the face for nurses doing night shifts on Covid-19 wards, who routinely pay a higher rate on their wages.

Moreover, most of the additional tax revenue negotiated under the OECD/G20 deal will go to exchequers in Europe and the United States. Countries in the global south, which lose a much higher proportion of their tax base to tax abuse, will gain very little, if anything, from the new rules.

Multilateral reform

Yet, weak as the OECD/G20 deal is, it is a stark recognition that tax competition and the associated ‘race to the bottom’ can only be ended through multilateral reform. The next step is to raise the global minimum rate to at least 25 per cent and ensure that additional tax revenue flows to countries where economic activity takes place—not just where the multinational headquarters are.

Ultimately, we need a genuinely inclusive, intergovernmental tax body at the United Nations, such as that proposed recently by the G77 group of 134 countries. Fixing the international tax architecture will of course take time—and negotiations must begin immediately. Yet key measures can be put in place right away.

First, we need a wealth tax on the mega-rich, many of whom have seen their portfolios increase dramatically while countless others struggle to survive. Secondly, an excess-profits tax should be imposed on those who have cashed in on the crisis—companies such as Amazon, which directly benefited from smaller, high-street competitors closing up shop to slow the virus’ spread.

Thirdly, unilateral measures are necessary to advance unitary taxation—taxing each multinational in the round, rather than allowing it to lodge profits in low-tax subsidiaries—especially in light of the digitalisation of the economy. Finally, public country-by-country reporting must be immediately introduced, so that we no longer have to rely on leaks, such as the Pandora and Panama papers, to find out what’s really going on.

Political will

For too long, political leaders have claimed that there simply isn’t enough money available to resource our health systems and other public services properly. But, as our new report shows, what is lacking is not resources but the political will to take the necessary action.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

It’s time for governments to show the courage worthy of their frontline workers by rejecting the corporate lobbyists and finally pursuing measures that force multinationals and the mega-rich to pay their fair shares. If not now, then when?

Pics
Rosa Pavanelli

Rosa Pavanelli is general secretary of Public Services International (PSI) and chair of the Council of Global Unions.

You are here: Home / Economy / Tax abuse—it’s costing the earth

Most Popular Posts

Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic
Orbán,Hungary,Russia,Putin,sanctions,European Union,EU,European Parliament,commission,funds,funding Time to confront Europe’s rogue state—HungaryStephen Pogány

Most Recent Posts

reality check,EU foreign policy,Russia Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—a reality check for the EUHeidi Mauer, Richard Whitman and Nicholas Wright
permanent EU investment fund,Recovery and Resilience Facility,public investment,RRF Towards a permanent EU investment fundPhilipp Heimberger and Andreas Lichtenberger
sustainability,SDGs,Finland Embedding sustainability in a government programmeJohanna Juselius
social dialogue,social partners Social dialogue must be at the heart of Europe’s futureClaes-Mikael Ståhl
Jacinda Ardern,women,leadership,New Zealand What it means when Jacinda Ardern calls timePeter Davis

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

The winter issue of the Progressive Post magazine from FEPS is out!

The sequence of recent catastrophes has thrust new words into our vocabulary—'polycrisis', for example, even 'permacrisis'. These challenges have multiple origins, reinforce each other and cannot be tackled individually. But could they also be opportunities for the EU?

This issue offers compelling analyses on the European health union, multilateralism and international co-operation, the state of the union, political alternatives to the narrative imposed by the right and much more!


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

The EU recovery strategy: a blueprint for a more Social Europe or a house of cards?

This new ETUI paper explores the European Union recovery strategy, with a focus on its potentially transformative aspects vis-à-vis European integration and its implications for the social dimension of the EU’s socio-economic governance. In particular, it reflects on whether the agreed measures provide sufficient safeguards against the spectre of austerity and whether these constitute steps away from treating social and labour policies as mere ‘variables’ of economic growth.


DOWNLOAD HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube