Social Europe

  • EU Forward Project
  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • Books
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

Breaking the impasse on corporate taxation

Liina Carr 27th November 2020

As Europe’s exchequers go deep into the red due to the pandemic, a co-ordinated approach to corporate taxation is ever-more urgent.

corporate taxation, minimum corporate tax, unitary taxation
Liina Carr

The Covid-19 pandemic has placed hitherto unimaginable pressure on public finances throughout Europe and around the world.

Yet while workers struggle to live on what assistance they can secure, multinational companies are able to manipulate their tax liabilities to make the lowest possible payments, and governments are squabbling over their responses. Hundreds of thousands of Europeans are now demanding fair and just tax rules.

Trade unions in Europe are pressing harder than ever for an effective minimum corporate tax rate—of at least 25 per cent—to shore up public budgets and promote social justice, as well as unitary taxation of multinationals and full transparency in company accounting methods.

According to the Tax Justice Network, over $427 billion (€358 billion) are lost as a result of international corporate tax abuse and private tax evasion each year. The graph below shows how corporate profits have soared in the United States since the war, while tax revenue has slumped.

Corporate profits and corporate tax revenues in the US by year

corporate taxation, minimum corporate tax, unitary taxation
Source: Economic Policy Institute

Lack of co-ordination encourages countries to compete through ever-lower tax rates to attract multinational business. International companies can select the most favourable tax regulations they find in one jurisdiction and shift their profits away from countries with higher rates, regardless of where their real activities take place. Since shifting profits is an expensive endeavour, it is the richest companies that are making the biggest gains.

The labour movement has long demanded an end to the under-taxation of international businesses and unfair and mutually harmful ‘tax competition’. And yet, even in the midst of the pandemic, corporate taxation divides countries, preventing any constructive international framework emerging.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



Locked in negotiations

The 37 members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, responsible for two-thirds of the world’s gross domestic product, have been locked in negotiations since 2018 on a minimum corporate-tax rate and a global end to tax-base erosion (the sought-after ‘GloBe’ agreement), as well as the taxation of businesses with huge global revenues and intangible assets but little or no ‘physical establishment’. The taxation challenges of the digitalisation of the economy require profound and enduring responses.

While disagreement rages, even among European Union member states, on the taxation of digital companies, the European Trade Union Confederation demands urgent and decisive action on a common corporate-tax rate for Europe. Although the European Commission is not a negotiator in the OECD talks, it must come off the fence and set standards at EU level. This would have a snowball effect, paving the way towards a vital global consensus.

Member states’ corporate-tax rates vary hugely (see table below). In 2019, France imposed the highest effective average rate, of 33 per cent, compared with just 9 per cent in Bulgaria. But what concerns trade unions is that in specific negotiations companies can secure rates as low as 2 per cent. Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and some eastern-European countries have been known to offer comparable incentives.

Ireland’s refusal in 2017 to reclaim €13 billion in back tax from Apple, as instructed by the commission, is just one high-profile example of how ruthless tax competition is starving society of much-needed funds. Harmful tax competition has caused a decline in global average rates from 35 per cent in the 1990s to 21 per cent in 2018.

Effective average tax rates (%), large corporations in non-financial sector (computed at corporate level, for average asset composition and funding sources)

2019Ranking
EU2819.7NA
Belgium25.06
Bulgaria9.028
Czechia16.718
Denmark19.813
Germany28.93
Estonia13.924
Ireland14.123
Greece26.64
Spain30.12
France33.41
Croatia14.821
Italy24.67
Cyprus13.425
Latvia16.718
Lithuania12.726
Luxembourg21.810
Hungary11.127
Malta25.35
Netherlands22.59
Austria23.18
Poland16.620
Portugal21.411
Romania14.722
Slovenia17.317
Slovakia18.716
Finland19.614
Sweden19.415
United Kingdom20.212
Source: European Commission

Corporate taxation has a profound impact on workers. Aggressive ‘tax planning’ corrodes wages, jobs and conditions and increases inequality. It deprives the workforce of a fair share of the profits generated, often redirected to tax havens through convoluted accounting strategies. The wage share of GDP has been falling around the world since the late 1970s, as companies syphon off capital. Furthermore, multinationals hide revenues through complex artificial structures such as shell and letter-box companies. This not only minimises tax bills but also damages accountability and workers’ rights.

As corporations pay less tax, the burden shifts on to consumers and workers themselves, weakening public services and social protection. This is all the more indefensible in the midst of the Covid-19 crisis, when governments are incurring huge debts to ensure economic survival. Companies which use tax havens should be barred from receiving bailout funds intended to support struggling businesses.

As signalled, trade unions are demanding a unitary taxation system, whereby each multinational’s profits are calculated on a global scale and payments shared out between the countries where its real economic activity—measured by assets, employment and sales—has taken place. We are calling for a global end to tax-base erosion and a level playing-field for corporate taxation.

Effective minimum

The ETUC is also opposed to any threshold for the enforcement of a minimum tax rate. Some governments have mooted a €750 million turnover requirement but this would enable the great majority of multinationals to escape further obligations.

It could be argued that any effective minimum is better than none—a rate of 12.5 per cent has been mentioned in the OECD talks. But there would be a dangerous risk of such a low floor turning into an unacceptable ceiling.

The ETUC is pressing for an effective minimum tax rate of 25 per cent. There is no point in aligning a minimum rate with that of tax havens or countries with harmful practices. Exceptions should be limited to the strict minimum, for example institutions with a social purpose such as pension funds. Patent boxes—used by some countries to encourage research and development by taxing patent revenues at a lower rate than other commercial incomes—must be fully included within the scope of reform.

Last but by no means least, Europe needs greater tax transparency—the most effective weapon for risk assessment and identifying fraud and tax avoidance. This means country-by-country reporting of revenues and profits, with each company office accountable to its national authorities. Reporting currently kept confidential by companies and authorities must be open to scrutiny.

Trade unions must be able to study and assess company tax declarations, to understand the employer’s financial situation, its position in multinational structures and the scale of investment in low-tax jurisdictions—not least to prepare for collective bargaining and wage claims. While the European Parliament has long approved this principle, the Council of the EU has been blocking it for years.

Demanding action

With the German EU presidency again failing to put a proposal for country-by-country reporting on the Competitiveness Council agenda for a vote this week, some 228,000 people have signed a petition and many more have taken part in a Twitter campaign demanding action.

The commission needs to pursue fair taxation as part of its programme for recovery following the pandemic, including country-by-country reporting, unitary taxation and a minimum corporate tax rate of at least 25 per cent. The ETUC has proposed the setting up of a European Agency for Tax Coordination, which would also combat tax fraud.

A rethink of tax policy within the EU is vital to public investment in infrastructure, education, healthcare and social protection. We urgently need decisive tax reform, carried out in consultation with stakeholders, including trade unions, to close loopholes and combat evasion.

The OECD has committed to reaching an agreement by mid-2021 but governments need tax revenue now to handle the Covid-19 crisis. Trade unions will keep up the pressure to end company tax avoidance and achieve fair taxation.

This is part of a series on Corporate Taxation in a Globalised Era supported by the Hans Böckler Stiftung

Liina Carr

Liina Carr was re-elected confederal secretary of the European Trade Union Confederation at the ETUC Congress in 2019.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u4219834dafae1dc3 2 EU’s New Fiscal Rules: Balancing Budgets with Green and Digital AmbitionsPhilipp Heimberger
u42198346d1f0048 1 The Dangerous Metaphor of Unemployment “Scarring”Tom Boland and Ray Griffin
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato
u42198346ec 111f 473a 80ad b5d0688fffe9 1 A Transatlantic Reckoning: Why Europe Needs a New Pact Beyond Defence SpendingChristophe Sente
u4219834671f 3 Trade Unions Resist EU Bid to Weaken Corporate Sustainability LawsSocial Europe

Most Popular Articles

u4219834647f 0894ae7ca865 3 Europe’s Businesses Face a Quiet Takeover as US Investors CapitaliseTej Gonza and Timothée Duverger
u4219834674930082ba55 0 Portugal’s Political Earthquake: Centrist Grip Crumbles, Right AscendsEmanuel Ferreira
u421983467e58be8 81f2 4326 80f2 d452cfe9031e 1 “The Universities Are the Enemy”: Why Europe Must Act NowBartosz Rydliński
u42198346761805ea24 2 Trump’s ‘Golden Era’ Fades as European Allies Face Harsh New RealityFerenc Németh and Peter Kreko
startupsgovernment e1744799195663 Governments Are Not StartupsMariana Mazzucato
u421986cbef 2549 4e0c b6c4 b5bb01362b52 0 American SuicideJoschka Fischer
u42198346769d6584 1580 41fe 8c7d 3b9398aa5ec5 1 Why Trump Keeps Winning: The Truth No One AdmitsBo Rothstein
u421983467 a350a084 b098 4970 9834 739dc11b73a5 1 America Is About to Become the Next BrexitJ Bradford DeLong
u4219834676ba1b3a2 b4e1 4c79 960b 6770c60533fa 1 The End of the ‘West’ and Europe’s FutureGuillaume Duval
u421983462e c2ec 4dd2 90a4 b9cfb6856465 1 The Transatlantic Alliance Is Dying—What Comes Next for Europe?Frank Hoffer

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp