Social Europe

  • YouTube
  • Podcast
  • eBooks
  • Newsletter
  • Membership

American business will regret writing off democracy

Katharina Pistor 16th June 2024

By endorsing Donald Trump’s run for the US presidency, business leaders are embracing a man with only contempt for the law.

Man in front of US flag
Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase—Trump’s views ‘kind of right’ (lev radin / shutterstock.com)

American big business is in the process of writing off democracy, or so it seems. Stephen Schwarzman of Blackstone, the property-investment / private-equity conglomerate, is only the latest business leader to endorse Donald Trump’s candidacy for the United States presidency. The chief executives of major oil companies have done the same and Jamie Dimon, chair and chief executive of JP Morgan Chase, recently remarked that Trump’s views on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, immigration and many other critical issues were ‘kind of right’.

Much has changed since January 2021, when Trump’s followers stormed the Capitol to prevent the certification of the 2020 presidential election. In the weeks following the insurrection, many businesses solemnly vowed not to fund candidates who denied that Joe Biden had won fair and square. But these commitments turned out to be no more than hot air.

Preferring autocracy

The business world has never shown a real penchant for democratic governance, of course. When it comes to its own operations, it prefers autocracy over self-governance. Chief executives demand the obeisance of managers and workers, and shareholders, who are supposed to be in charge, are easily appeased with financial rewards and rarely muster the kind of collective action that it would take to hold executives to account.

What makes these business leaders so powerful? The standard answer is that they control the company’s assets. This is what Karl Marx meant when he argued that control over the means of production allowed capitalists to extract ‘surplus value’ from labour. Since then, economic models have vindicated him, demonstrating that control over assets does indeed translate into control over labour.

But matters are a little more complicated. After all, Schwarzman and Dimon do not own their companies’ machines or the buildings that house the traders, investors or bank personnel whom they employ. They may own shares in their business empires, or options to buy more shares in their firms, but these holdings typically amount to only a fraction of all shares outstanding. And while shareholders, collectively, are often portrayed as owners, equity does not give them control over the business’ operations or its assets. Rather, it confers a right to vote for directors, to trade one’s shares and to receive dividends.



Don't miss out on cutting-edge thinking.


Join tens of thousands of informed readers and stay ahead with our insightful content. It's free.



But while chief executives rule as if they were true masters, they do so through a power that is enshrined in the legal tools they use to build their empires. They can rely on corporate and labour laws that privilege shareholders over labour, financial regulations that protect the stability of financial markets and the generosity of central banks and taxpayers, who not infrequently bail out their businesses when they have overplayed their hands.

Comfortable cutting deals

These dependencies are rarely acknowledged, and the crucial role that democracy plays in establishing the legitimacy and authority of the law even less so. Business leaders are more comfortable cutting deals with themselves than they are with submitting to collective self-governance, but they are also deeply reliant on law and the political system that underpins it.

By self-dealing, they are replaying the early history of state-building, which the late sociologist Charles Tilly compared to ‘organized crime’. In early-modern Europe, political leaders remained in power by regularly cutting deals with their friends, who then cut more deals with clients whom they needed on their side. The rest of society served as foot-soldiers—a resource to be exploited by the powerful to fund internal and external peacekeeping.

But here is the rub. Unlike deals that are encoded in law, such arrangements are not enforceable. Nothing prevents a future president from breaching the promises he makes to business leaders on the campaign trail, and Trump has made it abundantly clear that he has little patience for the law and the constraints it imposes on him as a business leader, a president or a private citizen. That makes him a highly unreliable business partner and an outright-dangerous candidate for the presidency.

Yet many business leaders are turning a blind eye to all this. They are betting on more empowerment, lower taxes and fewer legal and regulatory constraints. Some will try to cut deals to prevent Trump from taking revenge on them for past disloyalty or slights. But what they will all be getting, ultimately, is legal uncertainty—which is bad for business.

Hong Kong syndrome

Call it the Hong Kong syndrome. When advocates of democracy and the rule of law took to the streets in Hong Kong to resist central control by the mainland Chinese government, most business leaders (and the bosses of big law and accounting firms) stood by silently and then embraced the security law that ended Hong Kong’s relative autonomy. Presumably, they feared the people more than the Chinese state, and thus welcomed the restoration of order after the demonstrations were crushed.

But this strategy has backfired. State control has tightened not only on advocates of democracy but on business as well. Businesses have resorted to self-help by moving data centres to other jurisdictions, giving their employees in Hong Kong single-use phones and otherwise reducing their presence in a city that once shone as a global marketplace and financial hub.

They did not understand that individual self-defence is more costly and less effective than collective self-defence. The latter requires a vibrant constitutional democracy in which the rule of law reflects a genuine commitment to robust self-governance, rather than serving as a fig leaf for rule by big business. By the time Schwarzman, Dimon and other US business titans discover the costs of writing off democracy by embracing Trump, it will be too late.

Republication forbidden—copyright Project Syndicate 2024, ‘American business will regret writing off democracy’

Katharina Pistor
Katharina Pistor

Katharina Pistor is professor of comparative law at Columbia Law School. She is the author of The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality.

Harvard University Press Advertisement

Social Europe Ad - Promoting European social policies

We need your help.

Support Social Europe for less than €5 per month and help keep our content freely accessible to everyone. Your support empowers independent publishing and drives the conversations that matter. Thank you very much!

Social Europe Membership

Click here to become a member

Most Recent Articles

u42198344ce 92c9 4f54 9a14 edee35fb9221 3 Europe’s Quest for Technological Sovereignty: A Feasible Path Amidst Global RivalriesChristian Reiner and Roman Stöllinger
u4219834670ab 1 Reclaiming Sutan Sjahrir: The Quiet Moral Core of Democratic Socialism in Southeast AsiaDeny Giovanno
u421983467 4b96 a2b4 d663613bf43e 0 A Fair Future?  How Equality Will Define Europe’s Next ChapterKate Pickett
u42198346742 445d 82f2 d4ae7bb125be 2 A Progressive Industrial Policy for the Global South: A Latin American PerspectiveJosé Miguel Ahumada and Fernando Sossdorf

Most Popular Articles

u4219834676 bcba 6b2b3e733ce2 1 The End of an Era: What’s Next After Globalisation?Apostolos Thomadakis
u4219834675 4ff1 998a 404323c89144 1 Why Progressive Governments Keep Failing — And How to Finally Win Back VotersMariana Mazzucato
09d21a9 The Future of Social Democracy: How the German SPD can Win AgainHenning Meyer
u421983462 041df6feef0a 3 Universities Under Siege: A Global Reckoning for Higher EducationManuel Muñiz

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Spring Issues

The Summer issue of The Progressive Post is out!


It is time to take action and to forge a path towards a Socialist renewal.


European Socialists struggle to balance their responsibilities with the need to take bold positions and actions in the face of many major crises, while far-right political parties are increasingly gaining ground. Against this background, we offer European progressive forces food for thought on projecting themselves into the future.


Among this issue’s highlights, we discuss the transformative power of European Social Democracy, examine the far right’s efforts to redesign education systems to serve its own political agenda and highlight the growing threat of anti-gender movements to LGBTIQ+ rights – among other pressing topics.

READ THE MAGAZINE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

WSI Report

WSI Minimum Wage Report 2025

The trend towards significant nominal minimum wage increases is continuing this year. In view of falling inflation rates, this translates into a sizeable increase in purchasing power for minimum wage earners in most European countries. The background to this is the implementation of the European Minimum Wage Directive, which has led to a reorientation of minimum wage policy in many countries and is thus boosting the dynamics of minimum wages. Most EU countries are now following the reference values for adequate minimum wages enshrined in the directive, which are 60% of the median wage or 50 % of the average wage. However, for Germany, a structural increase is still necessary to make progress towards an adequate minimum wage.

DOWNLOAD HERE

S&D Group in the European Parliament advertisement

Cohesion Policy

S&D Position Paper on Cohesion Policy post-2027: a resilient future for European territorial equity

Cohesion Policy aims to promote harmonious development and reduce economic, social and territorial disparities between the regions of the Union, and the backwardness of the least favoured regions with a particular focus on rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition and regions suffering from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps, such as outermost regions, regions with very low population density, islands, cross-border and mountain regions.

READ THE FULL POSITION PAPER HERE

ETUI advertisement

HESA Magazine Cover

With a comprehensive set of relevant indicators, presented in 85 graphs and tables, the 2025 Benchmarking Working Europe report examines how EU policies can reconcile economic, social and environmental goals to ensure long-term competitiveness. Considered a key reference, this publication is an invaluable resource for supporting European social dialogue.

DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Ageing workforce
The evolution of working conditions in Europe

This episode of Eurofound Talks examines the evolving landscape of European working conditions, situated at the nexus of profound technological transformation.

Mary McCaughey speaks with Barbara Gerstenberger, Eurofound's Head of Unit for Working Life, who leverages insights from the 35-year history of the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

Listen to the episode for free. Also make sure to subscribe to Eurofound Talks so you don’t miss an episode!

LISTEN NOW

Social Europe

Our Mission

Team

Article Submission

Advertisements

Membership

Social Europe Archives

Search Archives

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Miscellaneous

RSS Feed

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

BlueskyXWhatsApp