Social Europe

politics, economy and employment & labour

  • Themes
    • Strategic autonomy
    • War in Ukraine
    • European digital sphere
    • Recovery and resilience
  • Publications
    • Books
    • Dossiers
    • Occasional Papers
    • Research Essays
    • Brexit Paper Series
  • Podcast
  • Videos
  • Newsletter

Europe-wide inequality during the pandemic

Michael Dauderstädt 13th December 2022

The pandemic increased inequality among member states but Europe-wide inequality has continued to decline, if more slowly.

inequality,Gini,quintile ratio,S80/S20,Europe,EU,European Union,CEE
Kurzarbeit (short-time working) and furlough schemes protected incomes in prosperous EU member states amid lockdowns (michaket/shutterstock.com)

As the pandemic turns endemic and most restrictions—let alone lockdowns—fade, we can reflect on its impact on the distribution of income in Europe, among and within countries. Eurostat has now published the relevant 2021 data, unavailable at the time of our last analysis.

The pandemic hit some countries harder than others (figure 1). Southern Europe, which depends much more on tourism, suffered most. Between the years 2019 and 2020, average gross domestic product per capita decreased in the Mediterranean region by 8.5 per cent, compared with a decline of 2.2 per cent in central and eastern Europe (CEE) and 2.7 per cent for the rich northwest of the European Union.

In 2021, most EU member states recovered quickly, but unevenly. Between 2019 and 2021 (inclusive), GDP per capita increased on average among them by 3.6 per cent, but it still declined in Spain by 3.7 per cent. Southern Europe generally declined by 1.3 per cent, while the poorer CEE managed to grow by 8.4 per cent (the Baltic states were the star performers with rates above 12 per cent) and the rich northwest achieved a more modest growth rate of 4.4 per cent. If we look at the EU as a whole, the variance of country per capita incomes, which had decreased since 2014 (then 0.71), increased from 0.65 to 0.69 during the pandemic, indicating renewed divergence.

Figure 1: per capita GDP growth of major EU country groups, 2013-21

inequality,Gini,quintile ratio,S80/S20,Europe,EU,European Union,CEE
Source: Eurostat and author’s calculations. CEE = 3 Baltics, Poland, Hungary, Czechia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria; Mediterranean = Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Malta; Northwest = Ireland, Benelux, France, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland.

Figure 1 also shows the different long-run fate of the EU’s two poorer peripheries. While the CEE region continued to catch up with the rich core, growing by 54 per cent since 2013, southern Europe—although on average richer by somewhat more than €10,000 per person per year than the CEE group—managed only 14.3 per cent, compared with the core’s 23 per cent, thus not achieving convergence.


Our job is keeping you informed!


Subscribe to our free newsletter and stay up to date with the latest Social Europe content. We will never send you spam and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Sign up here

Most incomes protected

Within individual countries, the major impact of lockdowns was sectoral, harming certain industries such as tourism, restaurants and hotels. In these industries rich owners suffered as well as poorer employees. But states answered with huge spending programmes, including furlough, which prevented a strong rise in unemployment. Thus, most incomes were protected to a considerable extent.

The Gini coefficient is a measure of inequality, ranging from 0 (perfect equality) to 100 (absolute inequality). Averaging trends across states, the Gini coefficient of incomes before taxes and social transfers increased (from 50.2 in 2019 to 52.2 in 2021) but the (always much lower) Gini of disposable income even decreased slightly, from 30.2 in 2019 to 30.1 in 2021, indicating declining inequality. The same result can be seen when we use the quintile ratio (S80/S20) of the incomes of the richest to the poorest fifths of the population. Its average value, measured by Eurostat, also declined slightly, from 4.99 to 4.97 (figure 2).

This relatively rosy picture overall hides however some discrepant national performances. Again, southern Europe had the worst outcomes, with strongly rising quintile ratios in Malta (+0.85), Greece (+0.68), Portugal (+0.5) and Spain (+0.25)—these four countries showing the highest jumps in inequality. Constraints on social spending, due to already high debt in the context of the EU fiscal rules, might be one cause. Other countries saw inequality declining by similar amounts: in Luxemburg, the EU’s richest country, the quintile ratio decreased by 0.75 and, surprisingly, in Bulgaria (the poorest and most unequal member state) it fell by 0.65.

Continued catch-up

Combining between- and within-country inequality, we can determine the income distribution across all households of the EU, using EU-SILC (the Survey of Income and Living Conditions). This provides data on disposable income for approximately 130,000 households. These incomes have however different purchasing power in their respective countries. Therefore inequality should be measured in two ways: using exchange rates to standardise against the euro and applying purchasing power standards (PPS) to adjust for the differential cost of a basket of goods.

To reduce the numbers to be analysed we apply the quintile method, comparing the average incomes of each of the 135 quintiles of the EU population (27 countries timS20es 5 quintiles). Assembling the appropriate national quintiles we construct the EU-quintiles, with about 88 million people each, and calculate the quintile ratio by dividing the income of the richest EU quintile by the income of the poorest (figure 2).

Figure 2: EU-wide inequality (S80/S20 ratio) 2005-21

inequality,Gini,quintile ratio,S80/S20,Europe,EU,European Union,CEE
Source: Eurostat and author’s calculations. EU28-UK includes UK until 2019.

EU-wide inequality has declined since 2015, after a prolonged phase of stagnation. The major cause has been the strong growth of the poorer CEE countries—whose poorer quintiles make up the bulk of the poorest EU quintile—while within-country inequality has hardly changed. As this welcome catch-up growth continued during the pandemic the overall trend continued too, albeit at a slower rate.

The terrible performance of the Mediterranean periphery hardly affects this development, as they belong to the middle-income group of member states. Given that, it seems most appropriate that the EU is supporting the heavily affected countries through the NextGenerationEU recovery programme. One has also however to consider that the newest crisis hitting Europe—the war between Russia and Ukraine—is likely to affect the eastern periphery more than the south, possibly changing their relative fates.

Pics
Michael Dauderstädt

Michael Dauderstädt is a freelance consultant and writer. Until 2013, he was director of the division for economic and social policy of the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.


We need your support


Social Europe is an independent publisher and we believe in freely available content. For this model to be sustainable, however, we depend on the solidarity of our readers. Become a Social Europe member for less than 5 Euro per month and help us produce more articles, podcasts and videos. Thank you very much for your support!

Become a Social Europe Member

You are here: Home / Society / Europe-wide inequality during the pandemic

Most Popular Posts

Visentini,ITUC,Qatar,Fight Impunity,50,000 Visentini, ‘Fight Impunity’, the ITUC and QatarFrank Hoffer
Russian soldiers' mothers,war,Ukraine The Ukraine war and Russian soldiers’ mothersJennifer Mathers and Natasha Danilova
IGU,documents,International Gas Union,lobby,lobbying,sustainable finance taxonomy,green gas,EU,COP ‘Gaslighting’ Europe on fossil fuelsFaye Holder
Schengen,Fortress Europe,Romania,Bulgaria Romania and Bulgaria stuck in EU’s second tierMagdalena Ulceluse
income inequality,inequality,Gini,1 per cent,elephant chart,elephant Global income inequality: time to revise the elephantBranko Milanovic

Most Recent Posts

transition,deindustrialisation,degradation,environment Europe’s industry and the ecological transitionCharlotte Bez and Lorenzo Feltrin
central and eastern Europe,unions,recognition Social dialogue in central and eastern EuropeMartin Myant
women soldiers,Ukraine Ukraine war: attitudes changing to women soldiersJennifer Mathers and Anna Kvit
military secrets,World Trade Organization,WTO,NATO,intellectual-property rights Military secrets and the World Trade OrganizationUgo Pagano
energy transition,Europe,wind and solar Europe’s energy transition starts to speed upDave Jones

Other Social Europe Publications

front cover scaled Towards a social-democratic century?
Cover e1655225066994 National recovery and resilience plans
Untitled design The transatlantic relationship
Women Corona e1631700896969 500 Women and the coronavirus crisis
sere12 1 RE No. 12: Why No Economic Democracy in Sweden?

Foundation for European Progressive Studies Advertisement

Discover the new FEPS Progressive Yearbook and what 2023 has in store for us!

The Progressive Yearbook focuses on transversal European issues that have left a mark on 2022, delivering insightful future-oriented analysis for the new year. It counts on renowned authors' contributions, including academics, politicians and analysts. This fourth edition is published in a time of war and, therefore, it mostly looks at the conflict itself, the actors involved and the implications for Europe.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Hans Böckler Stiftung Advertisement

The macroeconomic effects of re-applying the EU fiscal rules

Against the background of the European Commission's reform plans for the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), this policy brief uses the macroeconometric multi-country model NiGEM to simulate the macroeconomic implications of the most relevant reform options from 2024 onwards. Next to a return to the existing and unreformed rules, the most prominent options include an expenditure rule linked to a debt anchor.

Our results for the euro area and its four biggest economies—France, Italy, Germany and Spain—indicate that returning to the rules of the SGP would lead to severe cuts in public spending, particularly if the SGP rules were interpreted as in the past. A more flexible interpretation would only somewhat ease the fiscal-adjustment burden. An expenditure rule along the lines of the European Fiscal Board would, however, not necessarily alleviate that burden in and of itself.

Our simulations show great care must be taken to specify the expenditure rule, such that fiscal consolidation is achieved in a growth-friendly way. Raising the debt ceiling to 90 per cent of gross domestic product and applying less demanding fiscal adjustments, as proposed by the IMK, would go a long way.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ILO advertisement

Global Wage Report 2022-23: The impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power

The International Labour Organization's Global Wage Report is a key reference on wages and wage inequality for the academic community and policy-makers around the world.

This eighth edition of the report, The Impact of inflation and COVID-19 on wages and purchasing power, examines the evolution of real wages, giving a unique picture of wage trends globally and by region. The report includes evidence on how wages have evolved through the COVID-19 crisis as well as how the current inflationary context is biting into real wage growth in most regions of the world. The report shows that for the first time in the 21st century real wage growth has fallen to negative values while, at the same time, the gap between real productivity growth and real wage growth continues to widen.

The report analysis the evolution of the real total wage bill from 2019 to 2022 to show how its different components—employment, nominal wages and inflation—have changed during the COVID-19 crisis and, more recently, during the cost-of-living crisis. The decomposition of the total wage bill, and its evolution, is shown for all wage employees and distinguishes between women and men. The report also looks at changes in wage inequality and the gender pay gap to reveal how COVID-19 may have contributed to increasing income inequality in different regions of the world. Together, the empirical evidence in the report becomes the backbone of a policy discussion that could play a key role in a human-centred recovery from the different ongoing crises.


DOWNLOAD HERE

ETUI advertisement

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2022

Since 2000, the annual Bilan social volume has been analysing the state of play of social policy in the European Union during the preceding year, the better to forecast developments in the new one. Co-produced by the European Social Observatory (OSE) and the European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), the new edition is no exception. In the context of multiple crises, the authors find that social policies gained in ambition in 2022. At the same time, the new EU economic framework, expected for 2023, should be made compatible with achieving the EU’s social and ‘green’ objectives. Finally, they raise the question whether the EU Social Imbalances Procedure and Open Strategic Autonomy paradigm could provide windows of opportunity to sustain the EU’s social ambition in the long run.


DOWNLOAD HERE

Eurofound advertisement

Eurofound webinar: Making telework work for everyone

Since 2020 more European workers and managers have enjoyed greater flexibility and autonomy in work and are reporting their preference for hybrid working. Also driven by technological developments and structural changes in employment, organisations are now integrating telework more permanently into their workplace.

To reflect on these shifts, on 6 December Eurofound researchers Oscar Vargas and John Hurley explored the challenges and opportunities of the surge in telework, as well as the overall growth of telework and teleworkable jobs in the EU and what this means for workers, managers, companies and policymakers.


WATCH THE WEBINAR HERE

About Social Europe

Our Mission

Article Submission

Membership

Advertisements

Legal Disclosure

Privacy Policy

Copyright

Social Europe ISSN 2628-7641

Social Europe Archives

Search Social Europe

Themes Archive

Politics Archive

Economy Archive

Society Archive

Ecology Archive

Follow us

RSS Feed

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on LinkedIn

Follow us on YouTube